For our court observation assignment, I was really excited about this project. I couldn’t wait to see what it was like going to court. I have never been in a court room and therefore, this was my chance to see what it was like entering a courtroom, and listening to the many different cases. Depending on the case, social workers play a critical role in our nation’s criminal justice system. This can be a large or small part of a social workers job. I learned that if one wants to observe court they must attend early in the morning. My first attempt to observe court was a failure. I leaned that court cases start early therefore, I needed to be there first thing in the morning. I also found that with each trip I made to the courthouse, it was filled …show more content…
Most of the defendant were dressed appropriately but others were questionable. The judgement for each case went very quick, approximately 5 minutes. I was quite surprised by this. I had it in my mind that cases were longer. There were several defendants who had a court appointed attorney defending their case asking for leniency and others pro se. I noticed that the court appointed attorneys did not spend much time with their client. I would estimate about two minutes. Something else that stood out to me was the court reporter who was recording the trials was not using a stenographic machine but rather an electronic recorder. This was something that I had never seen before. The judge was very observant with the defendants and at times had a good sense of humor. He would often ask the defendants why they did what they did, and if they had ever thought about the position they were in, and what this might do to their children. The judge was very understanding and reasoned with most defendants. He wanted to get a sense of what the defendant was thinking, and often gave good advice to those he felt deserved it. He appeared very relaxed and at
The United States Criminal Justice system has a unique way of approaching and handling criminal trials. In criminal trials there are important court room members with specific roles and certain court room procedures that must be followed. The court room members include the jury, the judge, the prosecution, and the defense. Some of the procedures of a criminal trial are arraignment, preliminary hearing, the trial itself, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination, closing arguments and the verdict. Each court room member’s goal is to fulfill their responsibility and to help justice be served.
Although, he did fix his concentration on performing the perfect crime. Together, Leopold and Loeb murdered fourteen year old Bobby Frank. This goes down as one of the many of brutal murder scenes of the 1900s. If they wouldn’t have gotten the best lawyer in town, Clarence Darrow, it is more than likely that Leopold and his partner would have been hung instantly just as Dick and Perry were. Their attorney had such great points that were made, the judge only made them serve life in
1. Being well known and respected is hard to come by today, with the quick judgments individuals make. Judge Dorn and Judge Ciavarella seemed to have an exception and were liked by many people. They were seen as hero’s to some, always correcting behavior and following a strict line. The public really liked the way they ran the system, always speaking publically to ensure safety and ease for kids who are lost.
Lawyers presenting their arguments face the nine Justices are given a limited amount of time to present, however, justices may interrupt with questions. Abe Fortas, selected to represent Gideon, masterfully answered the justices questions while presenting the important points of his case. After the oral presentation, the justices confer in private discussion and select a judge to write the opinion of the court. For Gideon v. Wainwright Justice Black wrote the opinion and presented the court’s decision to overrule Betts v. Brady, a case he’d dissented on twenty years earlier.
Stepping in ten minutes before the trial was scheduled to start, an immense air of intimidation enveloped around me. This was my first time in a courtroom (let alone a Supreme Court), and it really moved me in an interesting way. Walking right up to the front row, I joined my classmates and clumsily removed my notepad and pen to jot down personal anecdotes during the trial. Surely enough, the judges showed up at 9:01 AM and once we paid our respects and the trial was underway. To my understanding, Terry Ellerbee was condemned to a death sentence for first degree murder in the trial courts and this was his appeal.
As we read, the average length of a trial will vary depending on the crime and the state where the crime took place in. The average trial lasts four to five days. However, it may last up to eight months if continuous postponements are granted. Also 79% of all court hearings are held within 30 days of being accused. (Schewbel,p2)
Social workers must be able to act on an issue quickly and effectively. Situations can vary depending on the case, the client, and the persons involved in the case. Herman was an elderly World War II veteran. He resided in a poor neighborhood, surrounded by different dangers: attempted break-ins, armed attempted break-ins, and other suspicious activity. There was proof of dangerous activity with what appeared to be bullet holes on his door.
The McMartin family and employees, witnesses, evidence are all processed in the courtroom. The courtroom is backed by many courthouse workers behind the scenes to ensure the process is smooth. The center of the defense case is lawyer Danny Davis, who takes advantage of every opportunity and seen agreeing to defend the McMartin trial in court. The DA failed to give supporting evidence to defense attorney Davis.
Justice Fried knew that the mass hysteria of child molestation had in fact affected the case. He also admitted that the children had been asked questions in a way that elicited a certain answer, one that confirmed the biases of all the prosecutors. To make matters worse Justice Fried also knew that the children 's testimonies were unlikely and knew how the defendant 's constitutional right of confronting their accusers had been violated. In the end Justice Fried’s position in the case was predetermined, it seems as if he did not even give the Amiraults a chance to prove their innocence. I think that Justice Fried was very biased and was not impartial at all and he did not adequately do what he was supposed to do in the situation presented to
To do this, they used various pieces of evidence and testimonies to convince the jury of their argument. The jury then decided whether or not Arias was guilty based on the claims of counsels, defense and prosecution. The judge was there to maintain order in the courtroom, negotiate between the counsels, and decide guilt, known as administrator, negotiator, and adjudicator respectively. Once Arias was convicted, the role then moves to correction. They are responsible for enforcing the punishment and incarceration that she was sentenced to.
Then, after the jury returned its verdict, he discussed the case with the trial judge and with each member of the jury. In essence,
Judges should be open-minded and fair, and should appear and represent themselves to be fair and open-minded. They should be good listeners but should be able, when required, to ask questions that get to the heart of the issue before the court. They should be respectful in the courtroom but strong whenever it is necessary to overpower a rambling lawyer, a disrespectful litigant or an ill-mannered
The two previous paragraphs have sum up some of the qualities needed in a judge, there are also other qualities that one can definitely consider such as intelligence, legal ability; communicate effectively their judgment which have been reached by applying the facts and legal principles to the
Social work is a dynamic helping profession, where the main goal is to improve the welfare of every individual in a society. Law is a system of legal rules that governs the way members of society interact with each other. Law is necessary for order, justice, punishment, protection and to settle dispute. Social workers need to have familiarity with the legal process and the understanding of basic legal principles in order to effectively be able to assess and intervene on behalf of clients. Problems where social work and the law overlap have consistently challenged social work professionals.