The way that this happen is he gives us an insight on what other countries have done about their heath and food safety. To give an example of this is he said, “Throughout the European Union, laws have been passed to guarantee food safety and animal welfare, restrict the use of antibiotics among livestock, ban genetically engineered foods, encourage organic production, and begin the deindustrialization of agriculture (3). When he gives this example this allows us to compare the US’s current state and see that other countries have made attempts to better their food safety issues. In the US food safety issues are not as important to American citizens because a lot of the food is cheap. They trust the regulations that are currently in place because they might not see all the issues that come along with the not having the best protocols.
Organic Food In the society where people are getting more concerned about one 's health organic food has become a widely spread and followed by many people tendency. Organic food is believed to have better impact on person 's well-being and not to cause harm to people and the surrounding world due to its ecological nature. The debate that has been recently developed around this topic cannot be solved easily since both supporters and their counterparts provide reasonable arguments supporting their positions. However, to get into the problem and find the answer to a question that concerns many people it is necessary to identify organic food at first. This type of organic food that is popular among many people is produced on organic farms.
However, they do not realize all the benefits of eating food grown and produced locally. Although eating locally can put a strain on one’s wallet, resorting to locally grown produce can put a positive impact on the world. Consuming locally grown produce comes with healthy benefits for everyone. Local produce is fresher and tastes exceptionally better(A). When buying grocery, one should believe in the “quality over quantity” rule.
Growing plants yourself lets you know that you were in charge of growing those fruits or vegetables. Those won’t have additives, any harmful things put in them like chemicals, and ensures that they’re nice and healthy for you. Wendell Berry knows that not everyone can make a mini garden in their yard however, but she has other ways for people to help so they can have pleasure in eating food and be happy. Fast food may be easy and accessible, but it's not good for us, and attacks us in so many ways, that’s why we need to focus on our American farming, to improve our
Rhetorical Analysis: Organic Farming In his article, “Organic Farming Healthier, More Efficient than Status Quo”, Anurag Muthyam, argues organic farming is a better farming method than conventional farming. He does so by first asking the audience where their food comes from drawing their interest into the topic. Throughout the article, Muthyam tells his audience about the potential good that can arise with choosing organic farming over conventional farming. Muthyam also explains the general concept of what is organic farming in the third paragraph after hooking the audience by telling them where their food comes from and how it is produced. After introducing the concept of organic farming, the author goes on to compare and contrast organic farming versus conventional farming.
The Sociological Perspective Individuals feel disquiet when it comes to how others view their lives. It’s not abnormal to use what we understand of society as a measuring stick to discover our own status in society. Imagine if every eye could properly use techniques found in the study of sociology before making an opinion or conclusion. Humans could start thinking on a global scale and put the theories of what they think they know to the test. Stereotypes and uneducated perspectives on race, culture, or regions of the world would then be profoundly reduced.
Logos is an appeal toward logic or fact. The director uses logos to present an argument which can be hard to refute sometimes. The film appeals to logic because, Kenner included statistics and facts about meat, dairy, and vegetables. One small fact from the film demonstrates the consumption of meat in a person’s lifetime. From statistics, graphs, and facts like these, we are able to prove a point.
While customers have individual perceptions that may be based on their cultures, there is a higher level of openness towards other cultures and reflective distance from one’s own culture. As a result, the marketing strategies adopted have to consider the cultural aspects and the variations that may influence consumer choices. Some of the main issues that require consideration in this case include the skepticism of customers about the acceptability of tissue culture beef. Customers may view tissue culture beef as being significantly different from traditional beef. People may have varied views about tissue culture beef because it is grown in the lab.
Web. 13 Mar. 2016. This article detailed discusses the pros and cons of GM foods, and shows how the pros of GM foods can overcome the cons of GM foods because the benefits that GM foods can provide to the world is so valuable, which makes the disadvantage of GM foods seem negligible. Ken Mandel is the CEO of XM Asia Pacific, which will make this a reliable source.
In the essay “Green monster” who do you believe is his intended audience and why? In “The Green Monster,” James McWilliams informs the reader about GMO (Genetically Modified Organisms) and the affects it has on animals, plants, farmers and our food. Through multiple illustrations of the affects of GMO, he contends that GMO has various potential consequences, which may in fact be more positive than detrimental to food sustainability. His intended audience seems to be food consumers but more specifically, those uninterested in or wary of products which are genetically modified. This is reflected in his first-person narrative introduction as a consumer interested in a product known as “South River Miso.” He is primarily interested in this product due to it being labelled as “GMO free.” The author is using a food, which is a common interest between all people, in order to strike interest in the audience that they should be more educated and aware of the contents in their food.
Thus the greater expense of natural foods. To regular consumers, this may seem as added precautions to make sure the food is natural; however, by reading these guidelines, it is obvious that Codex is trying to trivialize organic standards so the organization can extract profits instead of protecting the health of consumers. There are some who believe that Codex regulations are justified because they really are trying to protect consumer health by thoroughly checking to make sure the food is organic. Yet there are still others who think that Codex is merely part of a larger issue, and that it’s really the multinational corporations like Big Pharma that are taking over the food industry. Throughout her blog, Luther does use a lot reasoning in her article to prove her point.
Locavores are misinformed idealist who believe in changing the world by eating locally. They believe by eating locally, they are improving their carbon footprint, help the local economy, and creating a more nutritional diet. However, locavores are ignorant of many situations such as many people’s lives depend on trade and that many places are not suitable for farming. Even though a locavore’s heart is heading in the right direction, but their efforts are misguided. One of the main goals of the locavore in supporting eating locally is to improve their carbon footprint.
We were asked to read two articles one was “On Buying Local” by Katherine Spriggs and the other was “What’s Eating America” by Michael Pollan. In the article “On Buying Local,” Spriggs showed a great use of logos when she stated that it was better for us to buy locally because it was better for the environment. Spriggs gives us several reasons why we should give up “a little bit of convenience” in favor of helping the environment. Farmers wouldn’t have to lose their farms to larger farms, smaller farms could be more sustainable by using natural and local resources, and there would be fewer emissions. This idea has been meeting with some opposition people worry of economic damage, but Spriggs has shown the argument and counterarguments with the proof of how the argument is flawed.