A Discussion and Evaluation of the Usefulness of Sociology for Social Work Theory and Practice. Introduction. This essay defines, discusses and evaluates the theory and practice of sociology and its usefulness and application to social work and practice. The influences of a wide range of surrounding issues from, e.g. class, education, religion to culture and how they impact on social structure, e.g. with the family and the wider community will be researched and evaluated.
SOCIOLOGICAL SCHOOL Imp Theorist: Roscoe Pound, Montesquieu The sociological school of law is among the many theories that were framed by numerous scholars from time to time. The significance of individuals was proclaimed by theorists and scholars. The sociological school came about with the inevitability to stabilise and promote the welfare of the civilisation and the individual. There was an inclination towards socialization.
1 (a) Sociology is defined as the systematic study of the interaction between groups of humans or the scientific study of a community of people living together and their behaviour as a group (Perry and Perry, 2008). Sociology aims to interpret and understand the interaction of the individual with others or a person's behaviour as he or she interacts with the social environment. In this sense the individual and society are inseparable. The key concerns in Sociology include social groups (i.e. family, student unions) social relationships (i.e. doctors, lawyers) and social organisations (i.e. government ministries, school, and residents committee). (b)
The work of two sociologists namely Bernstein and Bourdieu, influenced the work of sociologists in education and linguistics. Bernstein used the term “code theory”. This theory was used to describe how the macro-level (social, political, and economic structures and institutions) is related to the way in which people understand systems of meanings, also known as “codes”. Bourdieu used the term “cultural capital” which will further be discussed. Just like Bernstein, Bourdieu attempted to empirically test a theory of society, culture, and education.
Nevertheless, you need to define your focus and/or goal of the study and determine your research orientation whether it be positivist sociology, interpretive sociologist, and/or critical sociologist (book pg 29.) Then determine which methodology is best to monitor, collect information, analyze, and group your subjects. Reach for a scientific
Kids now are growing up with constant exposure to technology. However, learning how to use technology to one advantage will bring change to the kind of technology found in education. Many today have the opportunity to harness the full potential of technology. By doing so their education is much more aware of the importance of technology. It could very well lead to innovations and furthermore advancements in the classroom technology.
Sociology is the study of the society and human behavior whereas, the word perspective can be defines as a view of things in their true connection or importance. Hence, the social perspectives provide standpoints used to look at human behavior and interaction as they relate to individuals and groups within society. The social perspective emphasizes that to understand humans for not what is inside of them, but what’s influencing them that should be observed. There are four theoretical perspectives used to understand society and human behavior. The four discussed here are structure functional, consensus and conflict, the gender problem and symbolic interaction.
According to Conley, Social Scientists have a set of typical approaches that they pursue in investigating any question that may arise. These rules are known as research methods. They are tools utilized to explore, describe, and explain various social phenomenons in a principled approach. The Two research method that I chose that Conley described in this textbook are Historical Methods and Experimental methods. Experimental methods seek to adjust the social scene in a certain manner for a given example of people and after that track what results that change yields; regularly include comparisons to a control group that did not experience such an intercession.