Kanyadaan—Marriage as Transaction
In Water Sidhwa depicts the institution of marriage as one of the primary sources used by the Brahmin patriarchy for the control, exploitation and objectification of women’s bodies in Hindu culture. The social and religious institution of marriage, in its heterosexual form, constitutes the basic structural and functional unit of a Hindu society and has been historically exploited by men for social and economic advantage. Sidhwa brings out the instrumental role played by the institution of marriage in objectifying and exploiting Brahmin women through the marriage of six-year-old Chuyia with Hira Lal, a Brahmin man in his forties. In Hindu culture, the marriage of a daughter is termed kanyadaan, a word which symbolically discloses the underlying socio-cultural construction of a woman’s body through its etymological structure. The Hindi word kanyadaan is made of two words: kanya, which means “a virginal young girl” and daan, which means “to give as gift”, thus, the literal meaning of kanyadaan is “the gifting of a virginal daughter”. In Brahminical patriarchy, kanyadaan offers an excellent legitimate opportunity for the families of the bride and the bridegroom to socially, religiously, and/or economically advance in society. Sidhwa writes about the popular belief in Hindu culture according to which, once a girl/woman is married, her natal family is expected to relinquish their rights over her because being a wife she goes into the
To expand my research to attain the goal of understanding specification of both explanations, The southern subculture of violence theory blames higher crime rates in the South on “cultural values that evolved from that region’s unique history” (Ousey, 2000:268). All cultural explanations are based on the social learning approach, which holds that criminality is learned through intimate interactions with others. Another example is that capital punishment is highest in the South. The economic deprivation explanation to differences of crime rates within regions of the country is synonymous with strain theories.
While they were all Muslim, the Islamic empires, or the Gunpowder Empires, dealt with other religions differently from one another. The first of the empires to emerge in 1280, the Ottoman empire, had a religious tax, or jitza, for being non-Islamic. The next empire to emerge in 1487, the Safavid empire, made their Islamic sect of Shiism required by law. The last of the Islamic empires to emerge in 1504, the Mughal empire, began as a religiously tolerant empire, especially during the rule of Akbar, but later changed to being extremely intolerant of religion. The Ottoman empire started to break down 400 years after its foundation, while the Safavid empire and the Mughal empire lasted for 200 years.
This article examines the cultural, sociological, social, and political effects of the Safavid Empire and Iranian geography on the Ottoman Empire. The proximity and contrasting religious identities of the two empires led to significant interactions and influences. Culturally, the adoption of Shia Islam by the Safavids challenged the Sunni Ottoman establishment, sparking religious tensions and fostering artistic exchanges. Sociologically, the promotion of the Persian language and arts by the Safavids influenced Ottoman intellectuals, while shared borderlands facilitated social and economic interactions. These dynamics had broader social implications in the Muslim world.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (LDS) have created a unique meaning and structure for marriage over time, because of the churches believes about the afterlife. Unlike other marriages, LDS marriages are held in temples and regarded higher than any other marriage. In the spring of 1841 the temple called Nauvoo was being built overlooking the Mississippi River . During that time Joseph Smith Jr. prophesied at the Nauvoo temple on July 12, 1843 about temple marriages and ceilings.
The “Outsiders” made me think about the rules that groups give us are strongly founded on what they see as defiance. It made me think that some rules are given within a group are not remotely necessary and that we as a society are to blame for what is deemed as “socially acceptable”. Deviants may not even be actually deviants but that’s what they are labeled by society because they think, what the deviant did was wrong, which could be made up by what society thinks is okay behavior. The relation to this reading and the sociology course shows how society controls us and how they consider we should act. It reminded me of how society tells us as women that showing off our body parts is deemed as trashy and not lady like, but men can do so without
A. I learned a lot of things while i watched the documentary on the MS-13s. They do a lot of things that i never knew people could do. There are so many members in this gang and everyone wants to be higher and higher up each day. A good term from our sociology book that i connected to the documentary was Competition. Competition in biology and sociology, is a contest between two or more organisms, animals, individuals, groups, etc., for territory, a niche, for a location of resources, for resources and goods, for mates, for prestige, for recognition, for awards, for group or social status, or for leadership.
If a man came from a wealthy family, he had the chance to have several wives. However, they all had to have their own household or “tipi.” The woman would never be left unprotected regardless of the husband’s death or infidelity. If the husband died, his wife had a choice of remarrying the husband’s brother whereas, if the woman divorced her husband, she will be taken care of by her family and he would lose his position in the clan.
Throughout the year we’ve learned and looked upon many different social views. The sociological concepts such as social interaction ,sex and gender, religion, race and ethnicity, and deviance are very important to society and have many social effects. My favorite tv show Law and Order(Special Victims Unit) covers and demonstrates these concepts in majority of the episodes. The show Law and Order consists of real life situations and issues which causes many different societal views or opinions throughout the show. Social interaction is one of the biggest sociological concepts.
In “Longing to Belong”, Saira Shah gives you a look into the life of a 17 year old girl longing to understand her parents heritage and trying to fit into a culture that is so much different from what she knows. Having a father who originates from Afghanistan and a mother who originates from India. Saira wants to learn the culture of her father’s afghan routes. The author feels the only way in to learning is by being betrothed into an arranged marriage. The author states that her uncle in seeing “two unmarried” daughters in the company of a chaperone visiting his home, concludes that they were sent to be married.
Summary “Arranging a Marriage” by Serena Nanda is a true story that occurred in India. The narrator tells us how marriage is arranged in India. The author tried to help her Indian friend to find a wife for her son. Throughout helping Nanda found that was not so easy to find a good match for her friend’s son. Nanda illustrates the importance of compatibility an arranged Indian weddings.
“Dadi 's Family” demonstrates how women in Dadi 's household fight to secure their status around the idea of the dominant patriarchal mentality which insists that females are the inferior caste. The dedication to the production of the film consists of following the life of Dadi and her daughters-in-law showing the viewers the struggles they encounter trying to maintain the traditional ways of living the gender roles that have been developed for generations. In Dadi 's Family, it is clear to see that there is a different role play that women and men play which demonstrates inequality between the different dynamics of gender and power. There are many ways in this film where we see women dependent and subordinate to male authority. To begin with, in the beginning of the film Dadi explains the process of how women are traded off as braids.
As much as even the most cultured person would like to think arranged marriage is in the past, there are still many cultures and countries today that consider this a tradition. It just so happened that on a beautiful, sunny Wednesday last week, I was scrolling through my news feed. Instantly, an article titled ‘Forced Marriage’ grabbed my attention. This news article reported that unbeknownst to a vulnerable young girl from South Asia, her wicked parents had made the decision to arrange a marriage with her male cousin.
In an article authored by Urvashi Agarwal on the role of females in Indian culture, she even points out the difference in emotions between the birth of a girl and boy: “sohras – the joyous songs of celebration sung at the birth of a child in the Hindi-speaking belt – are almost never sung for newborn daughters. Indeed, many sohras express the mother’s relief that this has not been the case and her worst fears have been proven to be unfounded” (Agarawal). This indifference towards females acts a specific example that shows undoubtedly that they are seen below men in the Indian hierarchy. In most conflicts involving an Indian family, it is safe to say that there is a presumption that the person higher up in social status, or in the case of Monsoon Wedding, the older and male Tej, would have the benefit of the doubt over a young girl like Ria. In addition, Lalit and the family were tremendously indebted to Tej, as he not only offers to pay for Ria’s entire American college education, but for the wedding as well.
It is reflected in the concept of chastity, a patriarchal value. It is one of the most powerful yet invisible cultural fetters that have enslaved female for ages. There has been enough literature, both oral and written, glorifying this enslaving value and deifying the female characters who observed it faithfully. The Ramayana in which Sita undergoes the fire ordeal to prove her chastity to Rama has been the cultural guide to Indians for more than two thousand years. The ethos of the Indian society does not permit women, to violate the norms of patriarchy in their pre or post-marital phases.
Organization Culture and Leadership Analysis Using Sociology Paradigm Introduction This study has described the organizational culture and leadership of my company. I analysis my company adopt the?functionalism Paradigm, which is one of the major theoretical perspectives in sociology. See below is sociological paradigm. This paradigm developed by Burrell and Morgan classifies sociological theories along the two orthogonal dimensions of regulation vs. change and subjectivity vs. objectivity (Burrell & Morgan, 1979).