If a person knows what is ‘good’, then their manner of behaviour will always be good, as they possess the knowledge of how to do so. If a person acts in a ‘bad’ or evil way, this is simply because they lack the knowledge of how to act in a virtuous manner. For Socrates, it was simply a case of knowledge being conducive to good behaviour, and ignorance being conducive to bad behaviour. No-one chooses to act in an evil way, according to Socrates. We aim for good behaviour but fall short of
Socrates uses reasoning and logic throughout his trial. I believe that Socrates is innocent because he defends himself truthfully with effect. He uses sound arguments and he is passionate about philosophy. Socrates did nothing to gain in life and did not want a high social standing. Socrates is fair and uses correct methods of arguments by uncovering the
This is why Socrates felt that it was his duty to remind the leaders of Athens of the importance of their humility. He chose to seek wisdom within himself
(Ambury, p.6). Socrates used this specific type of ignorance possibly to show that he was not judging or voicing his own opinion when conversing with others. With that, Socrates claimed that this ignorance he had, is that he recognized his own absence of knowledge (Ambury, p.8). One can assume that with his ability to acknowledge the state of knowing nothing, Socrates never would try to tell what was right or wrong with the moral beliefs that people had. His ignorance was very helpful, giving him an immense advantage when paired with the Socratic method.
No doctor should lie about a patient’s health in order to motivate them or prevent the patient from entering depression. One of the principles of the Kant’s theory is to do the right without regarding any possible outcome. Furthermore, lying is highly disallowed in this theory
Socrates seems to improve rather than corrupt other people young and old alike. In persuading others he always aims at controlling himself rather than provoke them. The knowledge that you have Socrates refers to it as wisdom. It is the knowledge that he himself and others lack. Sharing the bit that you have with others will help build a much better community and future generation.
The mother is telling her son that life isn’t a clear-cut, easy path, but that he must keep working hard and face life’s adversities. She wants to help her son because, as a parent, the mother wants to prepare him and prevent him from possibly making the same mistakes she did. The author writes the line “So, boy, don’t you turn back [...] cause you finds its kinder hard” (Hughes line 14-16). The mother is advising her son to keep going even though he might find that the challenge at hand is more than he thinks he can handle. She does this because, like most individuals, she has the obligation to help her son if it will make him stronger.
He has some saving graces. He is a principled individual and in this regard is prepared to perform what he accepts to be his obligation to the gods — despite the fact that it includes bringing charges against his own particular father. It creates the impression that what Euthyphro's dad has done under the current conditions was reasonable under Athenian law, and it was very improbable that he would be rebuffed. By and by, Euthyphro trusts it is his religious obligation to report what his dad has done, which is his fundamental explanation behind doing it. Having satisfied his obligation as to the occasion, his still, small voice will find a sense of contentment.
The way she dresses, denies the oppressive full covering, and can be interpreted as her way of challenging the oppression. However, for Laila, Fariba was no longer illustrated as the carefree liberal woman she once was, but rather a mother who is distant and prioritize her sons over everybody. Fariba’s negligence of her family brought Babi and Laila closer. Although there is not an obvious direct male dominance over Fariba, but in a way her sons have control over her life. Ever since her sons left for war, she longed for them every day.
In this view, life looks to be a competition to get more than others and whoever is most successful in the that competition has greatest virtue. So that man who got the greatest virtue can do anything whatever he want. According to Socrates justice is the key in order to reach any of the goals because it causes peoples to follow certain rules and enable them to act in common. Finally Socrates argued that since it is agreed that justice is virtue of the soul, and virtue of the soul means health of the soul, so justice is desirable because it is the health of the soul. It is obvious that if some one is not getting the justice than surely his heart got broken so justice is necessary for every one who lives in the society.