Both Meno and Socrates evidently seemed to have contrasting attitudes in regards to the concept of virtue, as seen in the opening section of the Meno dialogue.
Meno initiates the dialogue with Socrates by questioning whether or not Socrates knows what virtue is, specifically the way it is acquired by humans (Meno, 70a). However, Socrates does not give him a concrete answer, but rather a history of Thessaly (a blessed area), comparing it to Athens (a non-blessed area), in regards to wisdom (70a-71a). In Athens, nobody knows what virtue is or how it is obtained, including Socrates himself, when he says “I share the poverty of my fellow citizens in this matter.” (71a-71b). He tried to convince Meno of not knowing anybody in Athens who can answer the question of what virtue is (71b). Meno reacts to this by feeling a certain degree of disbelief, when he says, “...Socrates, do you really not know what virtue is? Are we to report this about you to the folks back home?” (71b-71c)
Meno’s attitude does not seem
…show more content…
It made Meno re-consider and thoroughly put lots of thought into answering the question of what is virtue as a whole. He compared Socrates to a stingray “both in appearance and other respects, since it too numbs whoever comes near and touches it.” (80a) He further admits to have his soul and mouth numb by Socrates, unable to provide the grand answer (80a). Ultimately, Meno seems to feel overwhelmed to Socrates’s persuasive statements and had his confidence drastically
With the Apology, and the Crito, Socrates comes to delve into his many teachings and finds himself put to death with the words of wisdom that have been passed down generation after generation. Socrates for many in this present day is a man of many words and great teachings, but anyone but Socrates thought differently, in Athens people thought of him as an annoyance rather than an integral part of society. As Socrates stood in front of the counsel of judges, he stood for what he thought was right and never changed opinion of himself or of his words. That’s why Socrates is still talked about in classrooms everywhere today.
Plato’s extensively insightful work, titled Meno, delves into the topic of virtue and attempts to define what is undefinable (Plato 45). Virtue is the context of this essay is referencing is aretê, or virtue in general (Plato 47). Throughout this essay, the writer will compare and contrast the main characters, Socrates and Meno, based on how they are presented throughout Meno and their opinion on virtue. To begin with, the character Meno can be described as an arrogant, simple-minded, and throughout a majority of the dialogue, inconsistent with his own views on virtue.
What do we learn about courage in Plato’s Laches? As well as illustrating your answer with reference to the dialogue, critically evaluate what you take Plato to teach us about this virtue in this dialogue. While progress is made on defining courage in Platos Laches, the virtue as a whole is not understood by the interlocutors. Laches and Nicias are able to give examples and situations of courage, however when asked to find a common universal definition they are unable to do so.
This could mean that Socrates had understood, or at least on the way to understanding what is the good and how to obtain it. This interpretation also explain Socrates´s behavior, as recounted by Alcibiades. Socrates spend most of his time either thinking(220D), or talking and philosophizing with others(221D, 222E).He seem to show extreme calmness and unrivaled self control( 221B). He does not desire physical beauty, money,power, or anything else that Alcibiades might be interested in(216E), and seem to only be concerned about giving speeches and
In the dialogue Meno, Socrates is asked by Meno if virtue can be taught. Socrates begins by asking Meno for a definition of what virtue is. In order to determine if virtue can be taught, there needs to be a clear grasp of what virtue is. According to Socrates he does not know what it means and he has never encountered anyone else who does.
Throughout the interview Socrates came to realize that this person was not wise, he only thought he was and appeared wise so people would think highly of him. Socrates tried to show the politician that he was not as what he appeared to be and while doing this the man and many others present were offended by what Socrates was trying to prove. Socrates reflected “ Well, I am certainly wiser than this man. It is only too likely that neither of us has any knowledge to boast of; but he thinks that he knows something which he does not know, whereas I am quite conscious of my ignorance. At any rate, it seems that I am wiser than he is to this small extent, that I do not think that I know what I do not.”
The dialogue Meno is more than likely Plato's earliest dialogues, with the conversation being dated to somewhere the time period of 402 BCE. In Plato s dialogue Socrates discusses ways in which virtue can be acquired with Meno. The conversation begins with Meno asking Socrates whether virtue can be taught, and this question keeps the two men in an engaging conversation about three ideas of virtue for the entirety of the text. At the end of the dialogue it ends rather inconclusively. They still have yet to define virtue, they don’t know if it is some sort of knowledge that can be taught or if it is innate, and if could be taught they do not have anyone who can teach this “principle”.
In Apology, Socrates faces possible execution as he stands trial in front of his fellow Athenian men. This jury of men must decide whether Socrates has acted impiously against the gods and if he has corrupted the youth of Athens. Socrates claims in his defense that he wants to live a private life, away from public affairs and teachings in Athens. He instead wants to focus on self-examination and learning truths from those in Athens through inquiry. Socrates argues that "a [man] who really fights for justice must lead a private, not a public, life if [he] is to survive for even a short time" (32a).
Moving on, Meno somewhat defines virtue as, “to desire beautiful things and have the power to acquire them” (Plato: Meno—77 B). However, Socrates begins to question him, and continue to get no where. Backtracking, Meno says, “there
In order to establish my thesis, I will start by stating and explaining the argument that Socrates presents, I will
(20c) Socrates mentions that it was human wisdom and nothing more that has allowed himself to know what he knows. (20d) Socrates even mentions
His goal was to make the court understand his beliefs prove which type of knowledge is worth knowing. When talking about the wise man he examined, Socrates said, “Neither of us actually knows what Beauty and Goodness are, but he thinks he knows, even though he doesn’t; whereas I neither know nor think I know.” This shows that Socrates proved he was more wise than the titled wise man because instead of faking the knowledge, that wasn’t too important, he accepted that he did not know which would result in him then seeking for
Socrates believes that justice benefits the just, but also benefits the city (other people) too. He is faced with a seemingly simple choice, escape Athens or remain in prison and be sentenced to death. Socrates’ central argument against escaping his circumstances is twofold. First, Socrates argues that “one must never do wrong.” (49b)
Philosophical thinking uses three acts of the mind: understanding, judgement, and reason. In order to have a sound argument all of the concepts must be applied. Socrates didn’t want to please the people by saying or doing what they wanted him to say or do. Socrates thought it was not important to seek wealth or fame; he was concerned with truth and virtue. He wanted to create an impact on humanity by relying on the truth and shining a light in people’s lives, even if they put him on trial.
For a kid to leave one’s family to prolong their education, it definitely takes a lot of nerve. As a result, Nelson Mandela certainly showed great gallantry in the process of working towards his dreams and building himself a bright future. Therefore, courageousness was clearly a trait that Mandela possesses, and it was surely a specialty of him in which he uses as an advantage to solve strenuous problems that he came across. Socrates was no different when it comes to his intrepidity. He was an unbelievably valorous individual, and was the only few who weren’t afraid of death.