Socratic Seminars
"The unexamined life is not worth living."
-Socrates
Background The Socratic method of teaching is based on Socrates' theory that it is more important to enable students to think for themselves than to merely fill their heads with "right" answers. Therefore, he regularly engaged his pupils in dialogues by responding to their questions with questions, instead of answers. This process encourages divergent thinking rather than convergent. Students are given opportunities to "examine" a common piece of text, whether it is in the form of a novel, poem, art print, or piece of music. After "reading" the common text "like a love letter", open-ended questions are posed. Open-ended questions allow students to think critically,
…show more content…
(after the first 4 chapters of THE SCARLET LETTER).
OPEN-ENDED QUESTION: Write an insightful question about the text that will require proof and group discussion and "construction of logic" to discover or explore the answer to the question.
Example: Why does Marc Antony believe that Brutus should be buried with all honor of a noble Roman given his actions? (after reading Julius Caesar)
UNIVERSAL THEME/ CORE QUESTION: Write a question dealing with a theme(s) of the text that will encourage group discussion about the universality of the text.
Example: How does the desire for power and position affect the character of Okonkwo throughout Things Fall Apart? What do we learn from this? LITERARY ANALYSIS QUESTION: Write a question dealing with HOW an author chose to compose a literary piece. How did the author manipulate point of view, characterization, poetic form, archetypal hero patterns, for example?
Example: How does the use of nature imagery in Frankenstein affect tone throughout the novel?
Guidelines for Participants in a Socratic
…show more content…
It's OK to "pass" when asked to contribute.
3. Do not participate if you are not prepared. A seminar should not be a bull session.
4. Do not stay confused; ask for clarification.
5. Stick to the point currently under discussion; make notes about ideas you want to come back to.
6. Don't raise hands; take turns speaking.
7. Listen carefully.
8. Speak up so that all can hear you.
9. Talk to each other, not just to the leader or teacher.
10. Discuss ideas rather than each other's opinions.
11. You are responsible for the seminar, even if you don't know it or admit it.
Expectations of Participants in a Socratic Seminar
When I am evaluating your Socratic Seminar participation, I ask the following questions about participants. Did they….
Speak loudly and clearly?
Cite reasons and evidence for their statements?
Use the text to find support?
Listen to others respectfully?
Stick with the subject?
Talk to each other, not just to the leader?
Paraphrase accurately?
Ask for help to clear up confusion?
Support each other?
Avoid hostile exchanges?
Question others in a civil manner?
Seem prepared?
What is the difference between dialogue and debate?
Dialogue is collaborative: multiple sides work toward shared
In the test case Foster sees Persephone, the history major focuses on the conflicts between the character and the social implications of the garden party, then the English major perceives that it’s a coming of age story where the character realizes that others hardships are not her own thus insignificant to her. Another thing that got captured my interest was the meaning of character’s physical appearance and what ailments affect them and by what the author means by it. I never thought about how physical deformities show that character’s distortion of morals. It stood out more prominently considering the other book I was reading on the side, which I will mention more on later. The way authors kill off their characters was also interesting: heart issue equals emotional turmoil, and the difference between going out with a bang or a whimper.
1. What were two ideas that interested or intrigued you the most in this section? Explain your understanding of them and why you consider them to be of interest and significance to you. Make them your own -- not something taken from WikiSummaries, BestBookNotes, or SkimSummary, or the like (trust me, I have read the sites used by students to avoid reading the book). One idea that was interesting to me was in chapter six “The Untouchables”.
While I stand firmly in my beliefs, no matter how I feel on the topic, I will take my argument as far in the other direction as I needed to ensure the other side is faithfully represented. I’ve carried this desire for compromise and cooperation with me, and I’ve tried to lead others down the same path. In a school where many students are so sure that their collection of beliefs is correct that they neglect the merits of any other contrasting ideas, and in a community that, despite its diversity, seems to promote the voices of only a specific demographic, I became frustrated with
Recall the thesis you developed earlier in this lesson. Research the literary work you want to discuss and gather enough evidence to support your thesis statement. Then write a 300-word essay. Apply the writing strategies you explored in this lesson. Spend about two hours writing a rough draft of the entire paper.
We split the actual presentation of how to interview among four members. The four parts of the presentation included finding experts, finding non-experts, conducting an interview and email interviews. The fifth member was in charge of creating and conducting the in class activity that followed the presentation. When this process concluded, I was given the role of delivering how to do an interview over email. Most of the communication for the project occurred over the Groupme app.
Socratic Seminar Questions Closed ended question - In the end what happened to the multiple teenage girls that called out the townspeople supposed of witchcraft? Open ended question - What are the causes of the mass panic in the solemn town of Salem?
Introduction I. Attention Getter Just to echo the words of Dalai Lama ”once a year, go to some place you’ve never been before www.lifehack.org II. Thesis: why go to Africa? for a safari, cultural historical and marine vacation III. Preview of Main Points: There are three main points that I would like to talk about a) The Beautiful Scenery b)
In terms of curriculum planning and initiatives to select core texts for instruction, at least one conversation should be held in regards to the real world application and relevance of a text. The idea that a text is relevant to the current society as well as student lives is crucial to a successful school environment. Students must be able to make direct connections between what they are reading and the world around them. Teachers are the necessary connectors of the concepts.
Listen and behave to inspire others and clearly convey and clarify your intentions. Your influence on others (subordinates and such) determines and affects the outcome you expect of them. Fostering faith and compassion forges a connection of a much higher level. We just cannot have a two pronged strategy for everyone across the board. In fact, establishing individual relations works well as it helps open up two way communication.
It's helpful to encourage participants to bring pre-written questions to a discussion session, because this will help them learn, and to develop a stimulating session. A good interpretive question is one that has shown up from the reader’s response to the work, and his or her curiosity about it. Factual questions about a text help provide some kinds of evidence that are put forward to understand the text’s meaning. In shared inquiry, it's assumed that the participants will come to the discussion with some knowledge of the explicit elements in a text, such as the names and relations of fictional characters and chronological order of a narrative. This information can be helpful in making great responses to interpretive questions.
I also wanted to feel confident in what I was saying so the audience believed the information I was giving. I accomplished these few goals by practicing over and over. I will be explaining what went well for my group with the content and delivery and also how the group worked together with the topic selection, preparation, research and presentation of our speech. In my group speech, there are many things we did well throughout this speech.
“How did the book change your perspective or increase your understanding of your topic or the time during which it occurred?” Louis Pasteur Fighter against contagious disease, by Marylou Morano Kjelle, gave me a better understanding on all the different inventions and discoveries Louis Pasteur worked on. Marylou in this book focused on not only Louis Pasteur’s inventions but his way of thinking and figuring things out. While reading this book I have realized that louis Pasteur has went through a lot over the years of his life.
Likewise, give credit to where credit is due. The last thing I’d like to address is being approachable. If we can listen to each other and support each other, we can accomplish so much more. Treat others with dignity and respect and remember that we are one team.
Debates are back and forth between strong opinions and views, and ultimately the solution depends on the audience to judge the most persuasive side. Being passionate about things, especially debatable topics can actually be seen as a benefit as well, but when one feels offended, provoked, or inadequate, there can be drawbacks to debating, especially when the solution is voted on instead of collectively
Shared Inquiry Discussions Besides preparing the interpretive questions that initiate discussion, the leader of a shared inquiry discussion also regulates its flow. The leaders will challenge you in your participants’ unclear on factually inaccurate, or contradictory statements that follow up on participants’ answers. Make sure to ask for evidence and invite further responses. It is the leader's’ responsibility to redirect attention to the question if the participants digress from the main point.