The density of population has direct effect on available resources and contributes to the large quantity of household solid waste generation. People migrate from rural areas to urban town and metro cities for education, employment opportunities and better needs. It is estimated that nearly 100000 people move from rural areas to urban dwelling in India (Dhongde, 2007). Family Income and size of the households have also contributed in increasing household solid waste. Many studies (Afon, Benitez et al., Jadoon et al., Gonzalez et al., kamran et al., and Sujauddin et. al.,) have proved that there is a significant correlation between the socio-economic conditions (family size, income and education) of the people and the generation of household solid waste. Generally, we can observe that wealthy people consume more packaged items, which results in a large quantity of inorganic materials in waste …show more content…
According to World Bank Organization, the solid waste generation is approximately 1.3 billion tonnes per year and it is expected to increase to around 2.2 billion tonnes per year by 2025 in global level. It also states that a per capita household solid waste generation rate is from 1.2 kilo grams to 1.42 kilograms per person/ per day in the next fifteen years. The generation of solid waste is varied from region to region and country to country. The annual household solid waste in East Asian countries and the pacific regions is around 270 million tonnes per year. Moreover, the waste generations in eastern and central Asian countries are around 93 million tonnes per year. OECD (the organizations for economic co-operation and development) nations produce 572 million tonnes of solid waste per year. In south Asia, approximately 70 million of household solid waste is generated per year. The solid waste generation is very high in china for the past two decades due to the urban growth, density of population and economic …show more content…
The census of 2011 report that the population rate of Uttar Pradesh, one among the 28 Indian states is higher than the population rate of Brazil. Brazil is the fifth most populous country in the world. The urban population rate of India was 285 Million in 2001 and increased to 377 Million in the year of 2011. Moreover, the population rate of Indian urban is greater than the total population of USA (308.7 Million). In 2001, the urban areas of India produced 31.6 Million tonnes of solid waste and increased to 65 Million tonnes in 2011. (Source:
( Internal Citation) This statement has an effect on the reader because it shows the other side that defends the authorities that we don’t read about very often.
From this, there is evidence within the context that
All of this combined evidence shows that their setting supports the theme of this
This source is credible, as the writer has done research on implicit bias in order to draw conclusions from the study. The
Harrop mainly supports her argument through the use of anecdotes and statistics of past and present events
In Richard Muller’s essay on Chemical Waste in America, he points out many different problems in todays disposal techniques of nuclear waste. He brings in readers by appealing to American citizens with his visual texts, guilt, and how we must start feeling some empathy for our future generations and find a solution to prevent a massive chemical waste epidemic. Mullers argument bases off his visual texts, by showing us a reality that is going on today. Among the visual texts, Muller explains the exact quantity of chemical wastes in the United States by telling his audience that, “we have already generated more than enough nuclear waste to fill up Yucca Mountain,” which is a storage bunker for chemical waste products. Muller even includes a picture of Yucca Mountain so the audience can get a feel for the absurd amount of waste we have built up.
This evidence helps support that there are so many
Introduction People tend to consume a lot, when there is consumption, there is waste – and that waste becomes a big problem that needs taken care of, which costs a lot of time, space and resources. If not managed, in turn, the world that we live in will become a hazardous place for all living things. According to the World Bank, people throughout the world, “spend $2.3 trillion a year on food and beverages alone” (Global Consumption Database, 2018), that is quite a lot. In addition to that, the world count mentions that, “we throw out over 50 tons of household waste every second. A number that will double by 2030”