Third type of terrorism is the single issue group, from the name itself, the purpose of this group is to advance a specific issue. The political end they want to achieve is only based on one issue, commonly; these issues are social in nature. The last type of terrorism based on ideology Lia presented is the religious terrorism group. This type can be motivated by religious ideologies and grievances. Religious terrorists are more likely to use ‘all in’ tactics such as suicide bombings, which is made possible by religious teachings used to justify or encourage this kind of self-
In the same way, if we talk about violence, we might usually come up with those obvious severe acts such as assault, murder, and war without paying attention to that violence hidden as its root. However, violence itself seems to be more complicated and paradox than that when some acts are being tried to indicate as violence acts. There are many people who are trying to explain and categorize what to be violence acts is included. Two of those are Mark Twain and Slavoj Zizek who explained violence act almost in similar way –the one is the obvious cruel act but the one is invisible in
This explanation of the causes of terrorism may be difficult to swallow. It sounds too simple, or too theoretical. However, if you look at any group that is widely understood as a terrorist group, you will find these two elements are basic to their story. People who choose terrorist tactics are also persuaded that violence, or the threat of violence, is effective. There is some question about who actually 'chooses' terrorism, and it may be
Along with these specific theories there are other external factors in the offenders environment that can contribute to the abuse such as: stress, society demands and drug and alcohol dependency. Abusers who perpetrate domestic violence, do so to control their victims, and in order to maintain that control they threaten the safety of the victim. Although there is no justification for their behavior, there are theories in which can help us to understand exactly why and what reasons drive these people to abuse the people they claim to “love.” Culture of Violence Theory The Culture of Violence Theory is the idea that in large societies, some subcultures have developed the norm of physical violence.
As mentioned above, some of them did not intentionally willing to be a part of an extremists group, they were forced to do so. If anyone were being pointed a gun, most of them would rather choose to live and being ruled by an extremists group than die. Some of them were doing what they think is right, the fact that decades back, they couldn’t fight corruptors especially those with power. Now, they found a way to justice by killing people, because they knew that its hardly possible to go against powerful people. Therefore, it is partly the extremists fault in a case where they intentionally killed people to get justice, because no one, not even a criminals deserve to be killed in an extremely harsh way.
The mindset which sets the paradigm that their religion is the truest religion in this universe will be a trigger which causes a chaos among religions. The wrong mindset about religion itself will direct society trough a movement which is obviously radical. Generally, radicals can be found everywhere. Radicals are most likely found, however, in arenas that allow them freedom to operate, and have few constraints . Their proclivity through the risk is often push them into the conflict against established movement organizations, especially in religion.
In the same article by William Deloof he also says that most terrorist attacks or terrorism speaking in general only mostly comes from countries in the middle east. That is astonishing to think how all the way from there terrorist can still control the minds and thoughts of people in America by social media or even just people talking to them about it. Defusing terrorism will be an issue we must solve in the near future because it might cause another terrorist attack or cause an all out war, but we can solve it by closing borders, enhancing security around the world and stopping ISIS. “Terrorist attacks in the U.S have increased in the past
Policy Options — Advantages and Disadvantage When referring to the extensive research on suicide attacks as a whole and in particular, retaliation methods for countering suicide bombers at the final stages of their attack, the most appropriate measures of action, initially appear clear. Nevertheless, just as with most troubling phenomenas, each option is followed by a series of pros and cons, which require deliberation for the purpose of achieving the most effective results. The following section will outline each of the policies available to the Israel Security Agency (ISA) and the Police Security Committee , followed by a set of advantages and disadvantages to each: Targeted Killings — Targeted killing of terrorist leaders and operators, using defensive and offensive intelligence (as a mean of protection, not
Most of the discourse related to terrorism today is aimed at analyzing terrorism as a strategy and tactic, with counter- terrorism as a goal. In such cases, the real question about the impact of terrorism on the societies targeted is overlooked. It is understandable that counter-terrorism is the primary focus, given the emphasis laid on protection by the political authorities and general public. It is, however, very unlikely that terrorism will completely be eliminated and hence it is more important to focus on the effects of terrorism, so that their brunt can be dealt with more effectively and their effects be dampened. By doing so, the overall effects of terrorism can be reduced.
Terrorism is the ruthless use of violence and threat of violence, a strategy to obtain certain purposes. It is the killing of innocent people by nongovernmental actors for different reasons- political statements, religion, ideological. (Matusitz, 2013) Researchers are interested in this topic because it is probably one of the most changeling issues for national and international security. Terrorism is linked to refugees and their status, because refugees come from the same countries or have the same religion as the ones who commit terrorist acts in the civilized world. This link between refugees and terrorism is so important and so controversial, because there is a possible correlation between them, but there is no obvious relation of causality.