For these reasons, critics of juvenile court system maintain strongly that the judicial system should ensure and put in place a uniform sentencing structure similar to adult courts for young offenders. Evidently, they revealed that imposing minimum sentencing for juveniles has been so far ineffective deterrent. Furthermore, the court has failed in its rehabilitation mission. Furthermore, according to critics, it could also be said that, there is strong evidence juvenile offenders commit crimes with malicious aforethought. In addition, this strong evidence should lead to greater formal charges in adult courts rather than juvenile courts.
By repealing the juvenile justice system we can put in a new system that will work. Nothing beneficial is coming from it and juveniles do not gain the understanding that actions have a consequence. If juveniles who commit crimes began to face trial adults, receiving life sentences or several years, crime would begin to decrease. These minors feel they can do anything because they are young. Our society needs to come forward to teach our children a better way of living.
Juvenile crimes are essentially crimes committed by adolescents. Some examples of juvenile crimes include homicides, robberies, and drug use. While these crimes are basically the same crimes that adults commit, the difference is that they are committed by adolescents and the motivation behind these crimes. The motives for which a crime may have been committed are stronger in adolescents such as stress, jealousy, impulse, or simply an attempt to seek attention. These things are important factors in differentiation between juvenile and adult crimes.
They say this because if the juvenile courts are accommodating than the minors may not understand the severity of their actions opposed to if they were to be put through a one-size-fits-all method that they may respond better. However, if minors are tried in juvenile court it may be more effective. They should do this because there they can be given methods of rehabilitation that may help them. In conclusion, juveniles should not be treated the same as adults when it comes to committing crimes so that they have a better chance to rehabilitate. Minors should not be treated the same as adults when it comes to committing crimes.
Why should teen felons get to spend their jail time in juvenile detention centers for committing the same crimes as adults? In today’s world, teens are increasingly committing violent crimes and being put in juvenile detention centers. Teens need to be tried as adults because it helps to bring justice to families of victims, and it also teaches the teens accountability. Charging teens as adults will also help reduce crime in the United States. Although many people feel that teens should not be given severe punishments because they are immature and innocent, they have not considered the problem teens are creating by committing these crimes..
These children go through very different experiences than their peers outside jail walls, face many challenges during their time in jail, and have difficulty adapting upon release. Placing children and teenagers in jail results in negative effects rather than rehabilitation. The juvenile justice system in America is complex and varies from state to state, but the overarching purpose is to rehabilitate youth offenders. It processes nearly 1.7 million cases a year and overall handles most of them the same way (“Youth Involved in the Juvenile Justice System”). When those under age go to trial, their sentence often is decided by how likely they are to be rehabilitated and learn from their mistakes (“Juvenile justice”).
They just become more violent or develop mental illnesses such as depression or anxiety. It does not help. Juveniles who commit crimes should be given shorter sentences instead of life in prison so they can actually recover and improve their
For example, Luke Corcoran, stated that “What [juveniles] are not going to have is the opportunity to kill another person.” (Hernandez, Page 6) Additionally, although juvenile crime is on the decline, “persuading the public to soften its stance on youthful offenders… is a hard sell.” (Hernandez, Page 6) However, most juveniles feel guilty about their crimes and change their personalities in prison. For example, a juvenile “took part in a violent fight… Although tried as an adult, he served his sentence in Juvenile Hall, and by all accounts has turned his life around… Jose represents how kids, even those charged with violent offenses, can change when given a chance.” (“Four Kids, Four Crimes,” Page 1) Similarly, Jacob Ind changed his values by learning that his detention was what he needed to “heal himself” as a person (“Five Stories,” Page 1) As a result, juvenile detention alone can enforce a life lesson for juveniles not to commit any crimes. In conclusion, having juveniles tried as adults is an unfair deal. After all, they are influenced by their psychological malaises, such as the effects of extreme brain tissue loss in areas controlling compulsion. This, in part, is caused by adults directly telling them to commit a wrongdoing without thought of the consequences.
Locking up kids for life just makes things worse for the community. It would definitely be more useful to try and work with these children to get them to finish school, go to college, and find a job rather than lead them in the direction to breaking the laws and committing a crime. Children who commit nonviolent crimes should not be locked up with people who commit violent crimes such as murder and rape. There can be other ways to deal with people who commit nonviolent crimes and/or have misdemeanor charges. Prisons are expensive.
It will act as a deterrent to anyone who posses the idea to pose a threat to the society. In other words, it discourages delinquency posed by youngsters, and keeps dangerous types of criminals such as serial killers or murderers away from other residents. In conclusion, vocational training and education should be put into consideration as a replacement for imprisoned punishment in tomorrow’s