Sophie Marsh Case Summary

Involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing of another, because of a negligent of unlawful act.

Mr. Matthew’s is being accused of Assault in the Third Degree, due to a confrontation he had with Mr. Russo. Under McKinney’s Penal Law § 120.00(1) a person is guilt of Assault in the Third Degree when with intent to cause physical injury to another person, he causes such injury to such person or to a third person”. N.Y. Penal Law § 120.00(1) (McKinney 2009).

Currently in the United States, Native Americans have a unique legal status that is much different than any other group, this status has originated from the history of this country and the relationship between the Natives and the government. The mistreatment and genocide of the Natives has lead the government to view them as separate from all other ethnic groups, especially through Supreme Court cases and treaties.

Yes, I believe Ms. Fortin was a victim of union animus because her employer were not big supporter of unions. Few months prior to her dismissal, Ms. Fortin appeared on a union flyer; consequently, the relationship between Ms. Fortin and her employer were not the same. In addition, Ms. Fortin attended a hearing concerning unions representing her workplace. When she returned to work that day, her boss called her into the office and gave her a disciplinary warning. Furthermore, two days later Ms. Fortin received four additional disciplinary actions. Her supervisor claimed that customers said they received poor customer service from Ms. Fortin. In 1994, the company decided to restructured its company finance and a new manager took over Ms. Fortin’s department. Staff reduction was part of the change; consequently, Ms. Fortin was one of the first employee to get laid off. Unfortunately, when the new supervisor decided to laid off Ms. Fortin, she had no prior knowledge of Ms. Fortin’s union activity. For this reason, the court should uphold the supervisor decision. Her supervisor allegedly laid her off because of her poor performance evaluation and disciplinary actions that Ms. Fortin had in her file.

In 1976, Howard Bettel and some friends entered Ki Yim’s store. After the boys began acting outrageously, an employee asked them to leave. Instead of immediately leaving the property, the boys went to the front of the store and began throwing wooden matches on the sidewalk. One of the matches ignited and caused a small fire inside the store. The employee and the owner of the store put out the fire and Yim grabbed Bettel with both hands to restrain him. While grabbing Bettel, Yim’s forehead hit him in the face causing severe injuries to his nose.

Jenny Stracner an employee of the Laguna Beach Police Department was told by several people that there several vehicles were seen in front of Greenwoods resident and the vehicles were only there for a couple of minutes. Stracner investigated these claims by staking out the residence and witnessing the vehicles at the residence for herself. After staking out the residence, she asked the garbage man to isolate garbage picked up and Greenwoods residence and hand them over to her. While looking through Greenwoods trash, Stracner located evidence that led her to believe Greenwood was involved with drugs. Stracner then received a search warrant and found large amounts of cocaine and other substance in the residence. Greenwood later posted

Defendant owed Jessica Kemper a duty of ordinary care and breached that duty by knowingly selling Kolleng alcohol while he was intoxicated on the Defendant’s premise. As a direct and proximate result of his intoxication Kolleng negligently threw a souvenir bat hitting Jessica Kemper causing her to suffer severe injuries requiring emergency medical care. She suffered pain, shock and anguish as a result of her injuries. The Defendant is liable for the actions of Kolleng pursuant to Ohio Revised Code section 4399.18. (COMPL.

At the end of John Adams term as president he appointed multiple judges. The commissions were signed by Adams along with being sealed by the current secretary of state, John Marshall. The problem with the commissions was that they were not delivered by the end of his presidency. He was no longer president when they were appointed. The president proceeding Adams was Jefferson, who now could decide whether or not to accept these judges. He did not allow these commissions because they had not been delivered by the end of John Adams presidency. William Marbury was one of these judges that was to be appointed. Marbury wanted James Madison, the current secretary of state to transfer these commissions. The questions in this case was if Marbury was entitled to his position, if this case was the correct way to get it, and if the supreme court had the authority to review the acts of congress. The court decided that Marbury would not get the commission. This case established the power of judicial rule by the supreme court.

5. The SRO's in their report say “He pushed Coach Reese off the student he was trying to restrain”

Bobbi Kristina Brown was moved to hospice care. Radar Online, June 24, 2015 reported that the family has agreed to take Bobbi Kristina off drugs so she can pass away naturally. This means that unless a miracle happens, Bobbi Kristina will not be with us for much longer. Bobbi Kristina was found on January 31; face down and unresponsive in her bathtub at her home in Atlanta. She was found by family friend, Max Lomas. He called for Nick Gordon to come administer CPR while he called 911.

The two men were originally in argument outside of the buildings by their car but the dispute stopped until they met again in the doors of the restaurant where the complainant, Mr. Humphrey, grabbed the defendant by his coat to move him out of the way, which prompted the defendant to say, “do not touch me.” The facts in this case are fairly indisputable considering that their are many witnesses to the event, and the situation is pretty agreed upon. I see Mr. Humphrey’s action as a provocation of the defendant. They were both fairly heated at this point which makes me believe that Mr. Mattachioni should not be charged with assault causing bodily harm. Both men had mens rea and to a lesser extent, Mr. Humphrey, did too act on his anger and really started the physical altercation. Before Mr. Humphrey's action, the two men were in a heated dispute but no crime had been committed. Mr. Mattachioni was reacting to the complainant’s actions. The two men however did both participate in some shoving when the dispute first started. The fight was consented to by both parties because of this. Another fact to back this up was that both men were also grabbing each other's coats at one point. This entire fiasco happened because of the complainant’s unwise parking job. This isn’t to say that I agree with the actions of the defendant. Mattachioni is guilty of

Pamela Kirkley is the mother of Damien Kirkley and David Kirkley. On January 5, 2016, the boys were taken into custody by the Warren County Department of Child Protective Services (hereinafter referred to as CPS). The children were placed in their sister’s home. CPS currently has custody of the children.

The case was based on Donna Yeager as the plaintiff on attorneys who released medical information in the course of a child custody hearing when Yeager asserts a violation of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA). The plaintiff claimed of wrongful death, intentional infliction of emotional distress, negligence, invasion of privacy and HIPAA violations as stated on FindLaw. However, the defendants contested that KRS 446.070 does not give Yeager a right of action where a Federal statute preempts state statutes and does not expressly provide such a right (FindLaw, n.d.). The foundation of the lawsuit was rooted on a case to govern the custody of a minor child, the mother,

Absolute right is dependent on if the defendant is a current occupant of the building.

Non Fatal Offences Against the Person Act 1997 section 2 states : " A person shall be guilty of the offence of assault who without lawful excuse intentionally or recklessly :a)directly or indirectly applies force to or causes an impact on the body of another causes another to believe on reasonable grounds that he or she is likely immediately to be subjected to any such force or impact without the consent of the other " . Following this with the incident between Murt and Bernie , Murt agrees to take part in an incident that could cause harm to himself as well as impact from the body of another . However in section 3 A person who assaults another causing him or her harm shall be guilty of an offence . Section 4 then states a person or intentionally