ipl-logo

Sor Filotea De La Cruz Analysis

990 Words4 Pages

There is no way to know everything there is to know. This means that knowledge will always be inherently limited by numerous different factors. According to DesCartes, knowing can only be applied to what one has clearly observed to be true (111). Observable knowledge can be limited by things such as background and sex. However, the greatest limitation may be lack of skepticism, whether it be questioning oneself or an authority. If a person does not know they are unknowledgable, it is because they did not question it to begin with. By contrasting limitations at work in excerpts from Aphra Behn’s Oroonoko, The Poet’s Answer to the Most Illustrious Sor Filotea de la Cruz by Sor Juana Ines De La Cruz, and Rene Descartes’ Discourse of Method, the range of knowledge throughout the pieces can be compared. Prince Oroonoko, the least knowledgeable with respect to Western knowledge of the time, is limited by his own lack of skepticism. Secondly Sor Juana Ines De La Cruz is quite knowledgeable, but limited by her gender. Leaving Rene Descartes (maybe the most knowledgeable) to only be limited by his own questions of what can be considered knowledge.
In the beginning, Prince Oroonoko is praised for knowing “almost as much as if he had read much”, …show more content…

Possibly the most knowledgeable of the three, DesCartes is most concerned with “seeking the true method of arriving at a knowledge of everything” (110). DesCartes is so particular about making sure the knowledge he does have is actual knowledge, that he creates a method to being skeptical (111). He discerns that the only barrier to knowledge is what you haven’t seen or experienced to clearly be true. According to the French thinker, we know we exist, God exist, and that what we know comes through self observation and observation of others. Under these circumstances, there is no real limitation except to got out and learn what is

Show More
Related

  • Ignorance In 'The Crucible' By Arthur Miller

    897 Words  | 4 Pages

    Throughout humanity, we undergo standoffs amongst the issues of ignorance we find within our deepest cores. To be knowledgeable, is to be within understanding. Can someone show enough humility to own up to their wrong comprehension? When we come to an unknown idea or object there is a moment of denial, a rush of fear. And there is a fight or flight thought rumbling in the mind.

    Read More

  • Christopher Columbus's 'The Exploitation Of Indigenous Peoples'

    748 Words  | 3 Pages

    They are simple, yet intelligent; capable, yet ignorant. He wrote such details to appeal to King Ferdinand and Queen Izabella, who had recently come out of a time in which their predominant religion was challenged and their resources used for

    Read More

  • Descartes Arguments For God's Existence

    846 Words  | 4 Pages

    In Descartes’ third Meditation, Descartes aims to prove God’s existence. So far, he only knows a couple of things with certainty. He knows that he exists, because he knows that he is a thinking thing, and that he has ideas or sensations in his mind. Because he clearly and distinctly perceives that he is a thinking thing, he is certain of that fact. He wouldn’t be able to be certain unless all clear and distinct perceptions were certain, so it is in the first couple of paragraphs that Descartes concludes that whatever he perceives as clearly and distinctly must be true.

    Read More

  • Descartes 'Sixth Meditation'

    420 Words  | 2 Pages

    Descartes search for knowledge starts with a self claim of doubt. Like we studied earlier, he doubts senses, his body, everything he has experienced in the outside world. Descartes didn’t want to simply become a cynic and just doubt something because it was the easy way out. He believes that doubt is able to move the analyst toward the elimination of mistake and will be given to knowledge. In the sixth Meditation, he continues on to differ between the mind and body.

    Read More

  • How Did Descartes Make One Doubt Their Beliefs About Reality?

    837 Words  | 4 Pages

    Descartes’ first indubitable truth is “I think; therefore, I am.” His existence could not be doubted because Descartes knew that he had to exist as long as he was to think. Initially, his method of doubt had disproved everything that he had believed in, leaving him nothing but his self. Descartes then pondered on the idea that it was useless to claim that a thing was real or not without a solid foundation. One must first doubt everything that they know in order to conclude that there is anything that which one knows for indubitable truth, certainty.

    Read More

  • Descartes Method Of Doubt Analysis

    508 Words  | 3 Pages

    Explain Descartes’ method of doubt. What is Descartes purpose in exercising this method? Descartes begins Meditation I by stating that in order for him to establish anything in the sciences that was constant, he would have to start from the foundations of all knowledge. By claiming this, he is adopting skepticism which is not him rejecting his beliefs, but doubting them.

    Read More

  • The Slavery Of Learning In The Narrative Life Of Frederick Douglass

    609 Words  | 3 Pages

    By restricting someone of knowledge, it is a loss of their identity, but the consideration of the overwhelming body labor is far worse. The exhausting labor is physically and mentally demanding. It includes long hours; little to none breaks of rest, and the beatings that tend to follow. In the moments of lack of knowledge can have a hefty toll on the mental mind. Knowledge is a privilege of having, and as the age increases the wisdom or knowledge increases.

    Read More

  • Candide Character Analysis

    1200 Words  | 5 Pages

    When one is not used to thinking for themselves, this can lead to the naive nature of Candide. After having multiple life experiences and seeing how cruel human nature can be, is a way of being exposed to educating yourself through real life experiences. Even after going through hard times and many negative experiences Candide remains optimistic. He may have been enlightened through his life experiences that in the end leads him to think differently. From the beginning Candide is introduced as a naive and very gullible man, he believed everything anyone would tell him. He is attracted to a woman and becomes fascinated by her.

    Read More

  • Descartes 'Mediation I: What Can Be Called Into Doubt'

    1000 Words  | 4 Pages

    Justified, true belief knowledge is only real if there is no conceivable doubt, but nothing can truly be inconceivable fact. In “Mediation I: What can be Called into Doubt”, Descartes tries to find solutions to this, but he only raises more questions about the world. Skepticism arises to challenge the idea of a perfect knowledge and to question the human mind and the world. Descartes reflects on the countless falsehoods he believed that became his knowledge about the world and wipes everything out of his mind to begin anew. Descartes starts with the foundations of knowledge, deciding only to accept opinions as truths when there isn't any conceivable doubt in his mind.

    Read More

  • Methods Of Rationalism By Plato And Descartes

    1082 Words  | 5 Pages

    Methods of Rationalism by Plato and Descartes Philosophy has had an impact on mankind for thousands of years. This topic attempts to answer questions about the everyday world, and how things are the way they are. In Philosophy, there are many different topics that are discussed. These topics include Epistemology, Ontology, Ethics, Political and Social Philosophy, Aesthetics, Logic, and more. The topic that will be discussed in this paper is Epistemology, or the study of knowledge.

    Read More

  • Descartes Non Deceive God Analysis

    726 Words  | 3 Pages

    We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume

    1404 Words  | 6 Pages

    Descartes and Hume. Rationalism and empiricism. Two of the most iconic philosophers who are both credited with polarizing theories, both claiming they knew the answer to the origin of knowledge and the way people comprehend knowledge. Yet, despite the many differences that conflict each other’s ideologies, they’re strikingly similar as well. In this essay I will attempt to find an understanding of both rationalism and empiricism, show the ideologies of both philosophers all whilst evaluating why one is more theory is potentially true than the other.

    Read More

  • René Descartes Meditations And Radical Skepticism

    1829 Words  | 8 Pages

    Descartes’ Meditations and Radical Skepticism René Descartes was a French scientist, mathematician, and philosopher, most famous for his contributions to bridging the gap between algebra and physics, as well as being recognized as the “father of modern philosophy.” Descartes, a pivotal figure in the rationalist movement, argued against traditional skepticism and Aristotelianism in an age of dogmatism (Watson) and established the philosophical significance of methodological skepticism. Among his contributions to epistemology and substance dualism, his introduction of the concept of radical skepticism was arguably his greatest contribution and has helped shape the world of philosophy as we know it today. Radical Skepticism Radical skepticism,

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Everybody Is Ignorant, Only On Different Subjects, By Eliot Andrew Butler

    496 Words  | 2 Pages

    by seeking knowledge (82). However, much knowledge also consists of the knowledge of ignorance. One cannot boast as an educated person while one is ignorant of how much one does not know. Nonetheless, that in nowise means one knows nothing but that there is a greater amount that can still be learned. One must not be discouraged after long times of hard work, with what seems like no reward.

    Read More

  • Rene Descartes Discourse On The Method Summary

    137 Words  | 1 Pages

    In “Discourse on the Method” (1637), Rene Descartes claims that he has developed a method, involving a set of principles, which has helped him attain truth. Descartes illustrates his development by acknowledging his dissatisfaction with his “learning” at school, by setting rules for himself that will help guide his reason and his behavior during his period of skeptical doubt, and by realizing that Descartes is a thinking being due to his inability to self-doubt. He accounts his discoveries, through the usage of an autobiography, in order to inspire his readers of seeking wisdom by continuously questioning supposed truths. Descartes addresses those who wish to seek wisdom on an individual level because he constantly emphasizes how the works

    Read More

More about Sor Filotea De La Cruz Analysis

Open Document