Soybean Technologies Case Study

1409 Words6 Pages

Due to the uncertainty created by the resolution 140/147 and because we are not certain enough to have a system that allows the recognition of the intellectual property of our Technologies, we have decided to suspend the release of the XTED technology in Argentina until these conditions are met.
Why now? Though, We have carried out a long proccess of negotiations with the soybean industry, we have not yet reached an agreement. And, as we are hurried to make decissions related to the realease of the technology, though we still don’t met the necessary requirements that we have set as necessary to go on with the process, we are forced to suspend the release.
1) What are the neccessary conditions for realeasing new soybean technologies?
Monsanto holds negotiations with both the soybean industry and …show more content…

The process is well advanced in its final stage, missing only the approval of the direction of markets.

8) What happens to the seed companies that had licensed this technology?
This is governed by private contracts between companies, and will be discussed thoroughly with them.
At the moment, there is no valid business license in Argentina.

9) Does this mean a commercial loss for these companies? Will they receive compensation?
This topic will be the subject of discussion in accordance to private contracts between companies.

10) What happens if a truck / cargo with XTEND technology in the future is detected?
Today, the technology is not deregulated, therefore, it can not be sold. If it becomes deregulated, it will be a violation of law, because there is no registration of the varieties.

Internal communication:
Objective: To generate a calmed environment. This measure is taken to strengthen the soybean business in the long run.

Call to Action: Keeping the focus on the company's business as usual: INTACT; CORN AND CROP PROTECTION.

Proccess
1) Comunication XTED team and soybean (floor

More about Soybean Technologies Case Study

Open Document