Thank you for taking the time to read my letter. I am writing to you, because I believe that the European explorers, conquistadors, and settlers from the Age of Exploration should no longer be glorified and celebrated in modern times. I do not deem it appropriate, considering the wrongs that were committed against the Native Americans during that time. Let us state how the Spanish benefitted from the harsh treatment of Native Americans. The encomienda system, for example, “granted colonists the right to collect payments from [the] Indians.” In exchange, the Spanish were to “give their workers protection and a Christian education.” However, the Spanish “forced the Indians to farm the land or work in mines. Eventually, the colonists claimed to own the land. Thousands of Indians died from overwork and harsh treatment.” In conclusion, the Spanish enslaved the Indians, overworking them to the point of death, while preaching that their religion would set them free. Let us state how the “atrocities of the Spanish conquistadors against the Taino Indians [had caused them to flee] to another island.” The Taino Indians were chased off of their own land and Chief Hatuey was “captured and sentenced to burn at the stake for having organized an uprising against the …show more content…
“Europeans simply assumed that if representatives of Christian nations discovered previously unknown lands and peoples, they had the right—and the responsibility—to take charge of them.” The Spanish actually “created a class structure based on race…The Spaniards and their children were the highest class. Mestizos (people of Indian and Spanish descent) and mulattoes (people of Indian and Spanish ancestry) for the next class. The lowest class was made up of African slaves and Indians.” I believe that it is narcissistic of the Spanish to simply assume that they are above the
The Spaniards believed they were better than the natives, however, instead of enslaving them, Cabeza de Vaca and his men became enslaved by the Indians. The group lost everything, besides faith. For example, “one of the gentlemen in our company, died; and the boat we had intended to go infoundered and could not float, and later it sank. And as we were in the condition I have described and most of us were naked, and the weather was too severe for marching… that if God Our Loard was pleased to bring them there…” (Castaways
The narrative from the Vatican surrounding the canonization of Father Serra inadvertently dismisses the negative impact the California Mission system had on the various native tribes in California. The Spanish colonization of California subsequently led to countless atrocities committed against the Native population in order to successfully control the region. One of the primary objectives of the Spanish was to convert the native populations to Christianity and ultimately control their way of life. This makes the Vatican’s effort to expedite Serra’s canonization particularly deplorable for the same Church that apologised to Native Americans for the actions of the Catholic church during the colonization of the Americas. Ultimately, Father Serra
Did you know that on October 12, 1492 Christopher Columbus came from Europe to the Bahamas and took over their land? In conclusion, the Native Americans suffered by Europeans in ways like bringing sickness, hunger, and human torture and abuse. First, many Native Americans suffered by Europeans, by sickness. Did you know that the Europeans brought sickness into the Americas?
Clearly, the American Government was trying to bribe them by compensation them for moving. However, they tried to make it be seen in a good light. Nonetheless, this report serves as a firm stance that the Native Americans will be moved voluntarily or forcibly. Thus, all the kind gestures were merely theatrics so that the government did not come off as cruel to the
Juan de Solorzano y Pereyra says that the Indians practiced savage customs or they attempted to commit treason against the Spanish people. Bartolome de Las Casas says that the Indians were gentle sheep and the Spaniards rushed in like a bunch of starving wolves, tigers and lions ready to devour. The Spaniards slew the Indians as if their lives did not matter what so ever. All of this happened throughout Cuba, Puerto Rico, Jamaica and Mexico (Hispaniola). Juan Gines de Sepulveda Sepulveda said that the Indians are a savage and cruel race and that the Spanish are a superior race that is why the Indians should be treated as if they are inferior.
Dear Bartolome de las Casas, I have read your The Devastation of the Indies, and I want you to know that I share the same sentiments with you. I am in deep sorrow because of the cruelty and violence directed to Indians, and such a behavior deserves nothing but condemnation and censure. I have devoted three years to the work of restoring Christianity in Western India, because I believe that people have to know about Christ (Knight, 2012). I support your claim that Natives are constantly cheated and betrayed by their conquerors (La Casas, 1552, p. 31). Further, I am greatly appalled with how families commit suicide together in despair because of the actions of the Spanish.
The harsh conditions the Indians underwent “encouraged the emigration of rural laborers from Mexico to the southwestern part of the United States” (New York: American Geographical Society, 1923). Diaz intervention in the administration of justice sided with the indians (162). He was aware that a large majority of territory was taken from the indians and so, made negotiations with corrupt companies which profited off of these lands. Part of this plan was to give the Indians sale on easy payment terms, irrigation, and education (Eder, 35). Indians were part of the rural population, they had their land taken from them and therefore were repressed.
On these islands I estimate there are 2,100 leagues of land that have been ruined and depopulated, empty of people.” (Las Casas) Nothing positive came from the people of Spain setting foot on the land of the Indians. Depopulation was just one of many hazardous effects that the Spaniards
All the Spaniards had done was killing of innocent lives for personal greed and acquiring as much goods as they could for their Majesty, doing so for the money was their justifications for killing the natives. Then we have Cortes, who instead of killing off the Natives of Tenochtitlan, he opened their eyes to the horrors of their religious ways and gave them the revelation of Christianity. Cortes didn’t mention any genocide of the natives, he spoke about the geography and religious views of the natives. He stated, “I will simply say that the manner of living among the people is very similar to that of Spain, and considering that this is a barbarous nation shut off from a knowledge of true God or communication with enlightened nations, one may well marvel at the orderliness and good government which is everywhere mentioned” (SB, 8). Cortes is only praising the natives and their life style because he feels the people have everything figured out in terms of being dominant and true government but, lacked in religion which he left them
The discovery of the New World by the Europeans is one of the most important events in American History. To be more specific, the coming of the Spaniards and later the movement of the Africans to Latin America had a lot of effects that are both negative and positive on the Native American’s culture but mostly negative. At first, the Latin Americans had their own cultural practices that they followed. They differentiated themselves by following their own beliefs in many different aspects. When the Spanish people entered The New World they got the chance to see how locals practice their culture and they thought that their practices were uncivilized and barbaric.
In the 16th Century, Spain became one of the European forces to reckon with. To expand even further globally, Spanish conquistadors were sent abroad to discover lands, riches, and North America and its civilizations. When the Spanish and Native American groups met one another, they judged each other, as they were both unfamiliar with the people that stood before them. The Native American and Spanish views and opinions of one another are more similar than different because when meeting and getting to know each other, neither the Spaniards nor the Native Americans saw the other group of people as human. Both groups of people thought of one another as barbaric monsters and were confused and amazed by each other’s cultures.
When thinking of the Spanish Conquest, two groups often come to mind: the Spaniards and the Native Americans. The roles of each of these groups and their encounters have been so heavily studied that often the role of Africans is undermined. As Matthew Restall states in his article Black Conquistadors, the justifications for African contribution are often “inadequately substantiated if not marginalized [as the] Africans were a ubiquitous and pivotal part of the Spanish conquest campaigns in the Americas […]” (Restall 172). Early on in his article, Restall characterizes three categories of Africans present during the Conquest – mass slaves, unarmed servants of the Spanish, and armed auxillaries (Restall 175).
This power imbalance and these payments are key in the subjugation of the natives. Furthermore, the paternalism of the Spanish toward the Indigenous peoples is obvious: “Captain [Cortes] stared at him [Cuauhtemoc]…then patted him on the head” (p.117). Post-conquest, and still today, “difficult relations” between the descendants of the Indigenous peoples and the “others” (p.117) still exist. The European view of the natives “as idolatrous savages” or, on the contrary, as “models of natural virtue” (p.175) demonstrate the versatile and often contradictory views held. Similarly, the Aztecs at times saw the Spaniards as gods, and other times as gold-hungry savages who “fingered it like monkeys” (p.51).
In 1550, Emporer Charles V summoned a debate to determine how Spain would deal with the Native Americans. Juan Ginés de Sepúlveda and Bartolomé de Las Casas engaged in discourse about this topic: Sepúlveda denigrated the Natives while de Las Casas defended them. Sepúlveda felt that the Native Americans were basically barbaric sub-humans, and that the Europeans were greatly superior to them. He felt that Christianity was far more altruistic than the Natives’ religions. However, Las Casas felt that the Natives should be treated equally, since he believed Jesus died for the Natives just like he died for the Europeans.
“Columbus, the Indians, and Human Progress”, chapter one of “A People’s History of the United States”, written by professor and historian Howard Zinn, concentrates on a different perspective of major events in American history. It begins with the native Bahamian tribe of Arawaks welcoming the Spanish to their shores with gifts and kindness, only then for the reader to be disturbed by a log from Columbus himself – “They willingly traded everything they owned… They would make fine servants… With fifty men we could subjugate them all and make them do whatever we want.” (Zinn pg.1) In the work, Zinn continues explaining the unnecessary evils Columbus and his men committed unto the unsuspecting natives.