4. Discussions
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether self-regulatory strategy instruction impacts upper-intermediate EFL learners’ speaking fluency. Based on most of the previous literature regarding speaking fluency, the number of the filled pauses was not a significant factor to determine speaking proficiency levels (Iwashita et al., 2008; Kang, 2010; Kang, 2013). However, Crystal (1987) characterized fluency as a “smooth, rapid, effortless use of language” (p. 421).
Sixty students enrolled in this study, thirty in a group which were taught using conventional speaking teaching and thirty in a group taught using self-regulatory strategy instruction while teaching speaking. In order to see the effectiveness of each teaching method
…show more content…
This finding is logical because every teaching and practice can exert influence on learners’ previous background knowledge.
The second research question investigated the role of teaching self-regulatory strategies while speaking and its effect on learners’ speaking fluency. Again, running a paired samples t test, it was found that teaching self-regulatory strategies exerts positive influence on learners’ speaking fluency. This finding can be justified as the positive impact of self-regulation and teaching self-regulatory strategies to students are approved by previous studies (e.g. Elliot & Church, 1997; Pintrich & DeGroot, 1990; Veenman et al., 2000).
According to Zimmerman (1994) “self-regulation refers to the degree that individuals are metacognitively, motivationally, and behaviorally active participant in their own learning process” (p. 3). Further, Zimmerman (1998) stated that “self-regulation is not a mental ability, such as intelligence, or an academic skill, such as reading proficiency; rather, it is the self-directive process through which learner transform their mental abilities into academic skills” (p. 1-2). Self-regulated learners should view learning as “something they do for themselves rather than as something that is done for them” (p.
…show more content…
After data collection and content analysis, the results were reported in frequency and percentage format. Some of the participants defined self-regulation as one type of metacognitive self-control strategies. This representation concurs with Pintrich, Roeser, and De Groot (1994) who referred to self-regulation as a metacognitive tool: “metacognitive control strategies include planning (e.g., setting goals), monitoring (e.g., tracking attention and comprehension, self-testing for understating), and regulating (e.g., reading, adjusting reading speed) strategies that help guide and direct students’ cognition” (p.
Dr. Derek Cabrera’s thought on metacognition, human and education is absorbing. He shares perspectives on four universal thinking skills: Distinctions; “Systems; Relationships; and Perspectives (DSRP)” that should be taught in learning institutions. Dr. Cabrera states, “Thinking is simply a process of structuring information and doing something meaningful with it.” Dr. Cabrera also argues that people lack critical analytical thinking, great at school work, but not real life situation. Education needs to be fixed from the bottom up; that can be accomplished by teaching thinking skills.
Discipline at the individual’s level is primarily self-discipline, the ability to control one’s own
The main characteristics of a Mindset is when people think that their simple qualities can be easily cultivated through their effort, which was said by Maria Popova. Ways that a growth mindset could be helpful to success is that while developing at the same time you're learning, so while you learn more you create a better mindset, which is the reason why it can become very helpful. According to Angela DuckWorth what it means to be Gritty is to be courageously persistent. And having strong qualities of tough uncompromising realism. The way Grit can help people with a growth mindset overcome obstacles is, they could have a long term goal in mind and would need grit to help them achieve their long term goal.
There was a study done that examined the self-control theory by using the criminal records of 500 adults. There were four indicators that were taken: aliases, social security numbers, dates, and place of birth that were used to create a self-control measure. “Negative binomial regression models indicated that offenders who scored low on the self-control measure accumulated significantly more violent index, property index, white-collar, and nuisance arrests net the effects of control variables. These findings contribute to the empirical support for self-control theory and indicate that self-control is salient using a criminal sample” (Matt Delisi, 2001, College of health and human sciences, georgia state university).
CBIs can be divided into two main categories, self-management based interventions and verbal mediation-based interventions. Self-management based interventions EBD students are directed to observe, record and reinforce their own behaviors. The following are three procedures used in self-management training. The procedures include, self-monitoring, self-evaluation and self-reinforcement (Yell, Meadows, Drasgow & Shriner, 2014).
Self-discipline is one main component I feel is demonstrated through sports and school. I have trained myself to not get overconfident or too low on myself when I make a mistake. When working on homework, I manage my time to complete my work before taking any personal
The overall goal of the book is to give guidance and understanding of how to help a student regulate themselves in given situations so they can complete a desired task. Often, students with self-regulation issues appear as students that are not trying hard enough to complete a task or defiant toward a task and are trying to get out of a task (McClelland, "Development and Self-Regulation"). However, the students are more likely trying to regulate themselves through actions that are not appropriate to the external situation. I have experienced students with self-regulation issues.
Considered as a part of the broader topic called metacognition (monitoring one’s own cognitive processes), it differs from it in that it involves the knowledge of, monitoring of, and control of one’s own learning and memory processes, whereas, metacognition is an umbrella term that entails the self-knowledge about all cognitive processes such as memory, attention, reasoning, decision making, etc. Thus, it follows that all metamemory judgements are essentially metacognitive, but all metacognitive judgements are not metamemory judgements. For example, making judgements about the time to be allotted or required to learn something, the level of confidence about retrieving information from memory, or about the ease with which information can be encoded, general beliefs about one’s own memory functions and capacities all come in the purview of metamemory. Although considered to be dependent critically on memory, metamemory has different connotations to it. It has been referred to as the assessments or commentaries that are made about learning and memory (Metcalfe & Dunlosky, 2008).
The behavior I chose to remove by operant conditioning was biting and picking my nails and the skin around my nails. This behavior consists of biting my nails, biting the skin surrounding my nails, and picking at the skin surrounding my nails. I group these behaviors together because I often do them simultaneously. For simplicity's sake, I will refer to the behavior as nail biting/picking; this term will include the act of biting my nails, and picking and biting the skin around my nails. I chose this behavior because when I pick or bite the skin around my nails, my cuticles become messed up look bad and are occasionally painful.
In China, Peacock and Ho (2003) researched 1,006 Chinese students of English and report that ‘females reported significantly higher use of all strategy categories; they also report a much higher use of individual strategies’ that are also associated with higher proficiency. In Malaysia Punithavalli (2003) conducted a research study with 170 ESL learners and found that female learners used greater strategies in and outside of classroom compared to the male learners. In many studies across different cultures there are important differences between genders in the use of social/ affective strategies with females using them more often (Zeynali 2012; Oxford 1995; Mohamed Amin,
Individuals exercise control over their thoughts, feelings and actions. (Bandura, 1986) states that people will be more inclined to take on a task they believe they can succeed in. People generally avoid tasks where their self-efficacy is low but will engage in task where their self-efficacy is high. A strong sense of academic self-efficacy enhances students ' academic accomplishment, quality of functioning and personal well-being (Adeyemo, 2001; Pajares, 1996). (Bandura, 1997) states that a sense of self-efficacy is an important contributor to the attainment of further competences and successes.
As a result, one of the instructional goals for Mario is to help him self-monitor more while reading. One of the teaching strategies that could be used would be to model self-monitoring. When the teacher reads a book, during guided or shared reading, the teacher should model the metacognitive process of reading an unknown or difficult word. By voicing the integration process of the three systems, Mario could gain awareness of the importance of self-monitoring, which could improve his self-correction ratio. Asking the questions “does it look right?
It is generally accepted that testing encourages and gauges students’ learning, although most students would agree that education would be a little bit more enjoyable if they took fewer tests, given that the tests contain a lot of marks at stake (Dunlosky et al., 2013). Hence, the idea of self-testing as a form of practice testing is a reasonable idea. When students do self-testing, they test their memory, what they have learned, what have they revised; anything they can recall from memory. Through this, they can gauge their own performance and where they stand in terms of comprehension and understanding, much like how teachers do when testing students. Hartwig and Dunlosky (2012) believe that “self-testing by recalling the target information boosts performance on subsequent recall and multiple-choice tests of the target information, and it also boosts performance on tests of comprehension” (p. 131).
Self-Regulatory Model (SRM) [1-4] is a cognitive-affective model that highlights the existence of the emotional component as well as the cognitive component; both of these components alter the perception of disease threat and influence each other. This model emphasizes the active role of the patient and his / her concrete action towards the change of behavior, which will allow effective interventions. According to the Self-Regulation Model, there is a simultaneity ratio between the cognitive and the emotional processing of the disease threat [4]. The Common Sense Model of Self-Regulation is a complex system that highlights the health and disease self-regulation [5].
Part A (20%) Firth, N., Greaves, D., & Frydenberg, E. (2010). Coping styles and strategies: A comparison of adolescent students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of learning disabilities, 43(1), 77-85. Research Area and Research Questions.