The Speech Against the Spanish Armada is also known as the Speech to the troops at Tilbury. It is a political and historical narrative text.
This extract comes from a letter by Dr Leonel Sharp to the Duke of Buckingham after 1623, it was published later in Cabala, Mysteries of State in 1654. In his letter he describes the events as an eyewitness and reproduces the Queen´s speech. After her leave, he was ordered to redeliver the speech to the rest of the army.
Lionel Sharp (1559-1631) was a churchman and a courtier, chaplain to the duke of Buckingham, he became an Archdeacon of Berkshire in 1605. It is plausible to think that due to his own beliefs, he might have altered the speech so it sounded like it was a divine intervention (of a protestant
…show more content…
She knew that “if, at the end of the day, it was impossible to be both a wife and a Queen - then Elizabeth would always choose to be a Queen.” (Loades, p. 212) that could be why she never got married. However, the reasons were both personal and political.
At the end of the speech, she entrusts the command of the battle in her “lieutenant general”, Robert Dudley. She believes that he will guide them into victory and so they should follow him.
Nevertheless, some historians question whether Elizabeth really went to cheer her troops at Tilbury or not and whether she made the speech. It is possible that the speech was created after the events.
As far as I am concerned, Queen Elizabeth I was a great sovereign and an inspiring woman. She knew how to take advantage of her feminine charms and her wits, she knew what to do in order to control the men. She mastered the double game and appearance of a fragile woman, when in fact she was one of the strongest sovereigns of England. With this speech she achieves her goal to inspire and encourage her troops. After the fiasco of the Catholic crusade the position of Elizabeth and the Protestant religion
This is an example of Elizabeth giving up her moral of being honest in order to have the ability to keep something she loves dearly, her husband. She proves that she is a good wife by lying for her husband’s life even after he has committed
Rhetorical Devices in “Speech in the Virginia Convention” Patrick Henry’s “Speech in the Virginia Convention” was a persuasive speech in favor of the revolution against the British Parliament. Like many people, at the time, Henry wanted to break free from Britain and start the United States of America. He delivered the speech on March 23, 1775 to the Virginia Convention with serious tone in attempt to rally up the convention for war. In the speech Henry used many rhetorical devices to persuade the convention. Some of the more effective devices are restatement, hypophora, and antithesis.
Queen Elizabeth I spoke about her faults as a woman and the fact that she, a woman, has a “heart and stomach of a king” (6). This shows that women were aware they were being looked down upon as they compared a strong heart and stomach to one that only a king could have. This speech shows that its
Elizabeth’s bravery and strength is a huge part of who she is. She is a source of goodness among so many others who chose to go along with the madness. Values as strong as these provide a shed of light in the midst of something as detrimental as the witch trials, where the poor values of others cost dozens of
her goal was finally reached. The 19th amendment, the equal rights between men and women. Elizabeth had always wanted just that. That 's what she worked so hard for. Every single accomplishment she had achieved had surrounded that goal.
Another response by Elizabeth was in Document 11, a speech to Parliament in which she states how men are not needed on the throne because she alone can care for society. Throughout these documents, she neglects to defend herself as being able to rightly lead the Church of England. However, in Document 12, her speech to English troops before the attempted invasion of the Spanish Armada, she passionately defends her ability to rule just the same as any king. Elizabeth showed how she was for the people and would lead them as well, as she did with the destruction of
The Crucible is not a play that wants for unique characters that call for an ability to bring nuance to the role. Many characters fit the ideas we may have of what a person living in the late 1600s would be like but they are given additional qualities that make some of their actions understandable to the modern reader. I doubt that I would be able to capture the manipulative energy Abigail gives off though I might fit her profile based solely on some of my appearance. And while I would certainly be able to make a wonderful John Proctor, it is more likely that I would be cast instead as the less adulterous of the Proctors.
Early American social hierarchies differed markedly for women of color—whether free or enslaved—whose relationships to the white regimes of early America were manifold and complex. Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, women in the colonies of the English West Indies and Carolinas, particularly women of color, were seen as subordinate by white male slave owners because of race and shared oppression of the female gender. However, these women were a means of economic gain for white slave owners. Taken from Africa to the New World as slave laborers, white slave owners valued these women for their ability in domestic work and fieldwork where they performed primarily unskilled agricultural tasks, as well as their potential to bear children. White slave owners of the Early Americas, driven by greed and opportunism, used political laws, physical characteristics of women, and social constructs of gender roles to appropriate
She was quick-witted intelligent and manipulative in the way a great queen could be her favorite son was Richard otherwise known as Richard the lion-hearted who was a skilled fighter and a natural leader and could eventually become king After King Henry died and she was released from prison. No one questioned her authority when she was released. she was 65 years old and she laid the law making sure everyone knew she would take no for an answer. she aided Richard now the king and made nobles and political figures take oaths of allegiance to the new king.
In the beginning of her reign she was struggling, in response to this the people of her country wanted her to marry a strong man to help her rule. But she wanted none of this. Elizabeth did not want to have a male companion constantly interfering with her decisions and having any power over her. Because she
After Mary got married, she imprisoned Elizabeth because she thought Elizabeth was plotting against her. After Mary Tudor died, Elizabeth became the ruler of England. The first thing she did as queen was forming a better government. Queen Elizabeth
By that time, she had been forcefully removed from the room. She had attempted to save John’s good name by sacrificing her’s. John had become very appreciative of this later in the play, actually thanking Elizabeth for lying to the court. “I cannot mount the gibbet like a saint. It is a fraud.
The speech’s main purpose is to persuade people to fight for their freedom. Patrick Henry’s speech is truly meant to persuade the Virginia Convention to prepare for war if the British government fails to comply to the needs of the convention. He uses an urgent and inspirational tone to deliver a thought provoking speech. This is essential to getting his point across, and that the need for assertiveness is significant. The convention was practically split in half, some wanting peace no matter what, and others who wanted immediate action toward the Britains.
In a time of conflict it is important for the involved countries to unite. Just the idea of being united makes the country stronger and more powerful, thus increasing their chances of winning the war. When Queen Elizabeth performed this speech, England was entering a conflict against the Spanish and their strong naval force. The Spanish were superior in their military forces, meaning the Queen needed to strengthen and unite her country to defeat the Spanish, which the Queen accomplished through this speech. Queen Elizabeth uses syntax, parallelism, and metaphors in her speech at Tilbury to promote the necessary strength and unity to defeat the Spanish.
Elizabeth clearly lets them know she will not abandon them. The fight was not theirs alone, but her’s as well. Painting pictures of the most intense of situations, but even then she would be with them. Igniting the spirits of her army and making it an honor to fight alongside her. Queen Elizabeth’s speech at the town of Tilbury was truly motivating.