Speech In Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
When I read Elie Wiesel’s speech on “The Perils of Indifference”, I feel that it has some relation to Susan B. Anthony’s speech about “On Women’s Right to Vote”. They do however, have different subject matter and are depicted in a different time, but both speak of “change”. These two speeches, written in different eras and having different listeners have one mutual goal. The commonality of their message in each of the speeches may not be seen at first, but let’s take a closer look. In Elie Wiesel’s, The Perils of Indifference he tells us what he recalls and what he seen as a Jewish boy growing up. He expresses how he was thankful for American soldiers’ rage and care that helped in his freedom, and how he’s so thankful to the President …show more content…
Anthony, she speaks on the right to be able to vote in a presidential election. Her speech is about her right as a citizen to vote. In 1872 women did not have the right to vote, yet, she illegally voted in the presidential election. Ms. Anthony appealed the introduction to the U.S. Constitution, where she argues the start of it, “We, the people”, and not just male citizens. She verbalizes that, “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union. And we formed it, not to give the blessings of liberty, but to secure them; not to the half of ourselves and the half of our posterity, but to the whole people - women as well as men”. (Anthony, 1872). Ms. Anthony mentions in her message that women and men are citizens, and how can women not be able to vote based on sex qualification? Her speech leaves very little room for argument. She goes on to say that it doesn’t state that only males can vote or in general. She’s goes on to say that “woman are citizens also, they are people and that no state has a right to make any law or to enforce any old law that shall abridge their privileges”. (Anthony, 1872). She very vocal about wanting change in her speech. Change in the in the way things are thought of that will fix was is unreasonable at that
Elie Wiesel And Susan B Anthony Essay
816 Words | 4 PagesThe purpose of this research paper is to compare and contrast Elie Wiesel and Susan B. Anthony, and their collective contributions, especially to the human rights movement and history. To this extent, I should first like to pro-offer some biographical information as well as background as it relates to the two. Elie Wiesel survived the Holocaust, wrote poetry, received the Nobel Peace Prize, and he was a political activist. When Elie Wiesel delivered the speech “The Perils of Indifference,” he was already a recognized authority of political action and peace. In his speech, Wiesel describes himself as a trustworthy messenger.
Analysis Of The Perils Of Indifference By Elie Wiesel
597 Words | 3 PagesA Holocaust survivor, Elie Wiesel in his ambivalent speech, “The Perils of Indifference” claims that indifference is dangerous. He supports his claim through his time he was in a concentration camp during World War II; In addition, Elie states that indifference is dangerous because he was almost killed by the Germans. Finally, Wiesel message was specifically toward the American President, Senators, and politician because they had the power to stop the genocide, but they didn’t. Wiesel purpose is to inform us that indifference is horrible and dangerous and in order to prove his claim he told his story about when he was in the labor camp in the book “Night.”
How Did Susan B Anthony Contribute To Women's Rights
627 Words | 3 PagesHowever, when thought of, most people remember her contributions to the women’s rights movement. She, and other feminists such as Elizabeth Cady Stanton, began to realize that there were numerous similarities between slaves and women. Both were fighting to get away from the male-dominated culture and beliefs. In 1848, these women began a convention in Seneca Falls, regarding women’s rights(Brinkley 330). They believed that women should be able to vote, basing their argument on the clause “all men and women are created equal”.
Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Perils Of Indifference
453 Words | 2 PagesThe speech Elie Wiesel gave on April 12th, 1999, Perils of Indifference, portrays the same message but mainly in three different ways. The first was his use of a lot of rhetorical questions. These were used in the topics of legacies, philosophies, and questioning the actions of President
Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech Perils Of Indifference
913 Words | 4 PagesThe Holocaust was a terrible time in the world’s history. Not many Jewish people made it out of the Holocaust alive, but Elie Wiesel not only made it through the dark years, but he also wrote a book and delivered a speech. Both of these things were meant to tell the world about the horrors that happened in the concentration camps and raise awareness about the Holocaust. The book Night tells us what Elie’s journey throughout 1943-1945 (the time of the Holocaust) was like with Nazis controlling the Jews. In the speech Perils of Indifference, Elie explains why it is dangerous to not have an opinion on certain topics.
Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
728 Words | 3 PagesThe general statement made by Elie Wiesel in his speech, The Perils of Indifference, is that indifference is sinful. More specifically, Wiesel argues that awareness needs to be brought that indifference is dangerous. He writes “Indifference is not a beginning, it is an end”. In this speech, Wiesel is suggesting that indifference is dangerous it can bring the end to many lives. In conclusion Wiesel's belief is suggesting that indifference is an end, it needs to be noticed and taken care of.
Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech
1362 Words | 6 PagesIn 1986, the Nobel Prize in Literature was awarded to Elie Wiesel for his book Night, a memoir of his experience during the Holocaust. His acceptance speech was intended to ensure that the events of the Holocaust were not echoed in the future; that no human being would be subjected to the same torment that he was. Malala Yousafzai was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2014 for her fight for the right to education of children and all young people. In her acceptance speech, Yousafzai shows great knowledge about the subject, and through touching stories and comments on her assassination attempt by the Taliban, she reaches out to people from all over the world. Through the use of rhetorical appeals and techniques, both authors manage to get their messages across.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech
552 Words | 3 PagesElie Wiesel Rhetorical Speech Analysis Elie Wiesel, a holocaust survivor and winner of a Nobel peace prize, stood up on April 12, 1999 at the White House to give his speech, “The Perils of Indifference”. In Wiesel’s speech he was addressing to the nation, the audience only consisted of President Clinton, Mrs. Clinton, congress, and other officials. The speech he gave was an eye-opener to the world in his perspective. Wiesel uses a variety of rhetorical strategies and devices to bring lots of emotion and to educate the indifference people have towards the holocaust. “You fight it.
The Fundamental Principle Of A Republic Summary
807 Words | 4 PagesShe states that men and women are equal and should have the same rights and should not be treated differently than each other. This quote by Anna from the speech backs this point up, “Now I want to make this proposition, and I believe every man will accept it. Of course, he will if he is intelligent. Whenever a Republic prescribes the qualifications as applying equally to all the citizens of the Republic, when the Republic says in order to vote, a citizen must be twenty-one years of age, it applies to all alike, there is no discrimination against any race or sex”. (Shaw,4)
Rhetorical Devices In Elie Wiesel's Speech
806 Words | 4 PagesParadox, parallelism, personification, repetition, rhetorical question, pathos. You may ask yourself: what importance do these words have? These words are rhetorical devices used to develop a claim. A person who used these important devices was Elie Wiesel. In his 1986 Nobel Peace Acceptance Speech, Elie Wiesel develops the claim that remaining silent on human sufferings makes us just as guilty as those who inflicted the suffering and remain guilty for not keeping the memory of those humans alive.
Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech: The Perils Of Indifference
1429 Words | 6 PagesRebecca Rickord Mrs. Graver English 1112 12 April 2023 The Perils of Indifference Elie Wiesel gave his influential speech “The Perils of Indifference” eat the White House in 1999. Wiesel was a survivor of the Holocaust; and due to this experience, he spent his life advocating for human rights and sharing what he endured as a prisoner in concentration camps.
Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
861 Words | 4 PagesHolocaust survivor and author of the novel, Night, Elie Wiesel in his speech, “The Perils of Indifference,” claims that indifference is not only a sin, but is an act of dehumanization. He begins to develop his claim by defining the word indifference, then enlightens the audience about his personal experiences living through the war, and finally asks the audience how they will change as they enter a new millennium. Wiesel’s purpose throughout his speech is to convince his audience not to be indifferent to those who were and are being treated cruelly and unjustly. He creates tones of guardedness , disappointment, abandonment, and hopefulness in order for his audience to see his perspective during the horrific times of the war.
Rhetorical Analysis Of Susan B. Anthony's Speech
991 Words | 4 PagesHowever, this is incorrect because the preamble says, “We the people”, and society should be thought of as a whole and should not be divided based on gender. In Anthony’s speech she says, “It is we the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we the male citizens; but we, the whole people, we formed the Union.” Anthony demonstrates how everyone is a person and the constitution clearly states that everyone should be equally treated, and people should not be discriminated based on gender or race. She explains how the citizens of the United States are supposed to be treated as a whole and are not supposed to be separated based on unnecessary factors. She uses logic and reasoning to get to the audience and tell them that constitution and preamble were written to help the country not divide it based on gender and race.
Elie Wiesel's Speech: The Perils Of Indifference
539 Words | 3 PagesElie Wiesel made a speech called, "The Perils of Indifference. " In which he believes that indifference is evil. Elie Wiesel is correct that indifference is corrupt because it makes people not care, and it makes other people suffer. Indifference makes people not care about something or someone. In Elie Wiesel's speech called, "The Perils of Indifference", he articulated, "Sixty years ago, its human cargo -- maybe 1,000 Jews -- was turned to Nazi Germany.
Susan B Anthony On Women's Right To Vote Analysis
814 Words | 4 PagesSusan B. Anthony, a woman who was arrested for illegally voting in the president election of 1872, in her “On Women's Right to Vote” speech, argues that women deserve to be treated as citizens of America and be able to vote and have all the rights that white males in America have. She begins by introducing her purpose, then provides evidence of how women are citizens of America, not just males by using the preamble of the Constitution, then goes on about the how this problem has became a big problem and occurs in every home in the nation, and finally states that women deserve rights because the discrimination against them is not valid because the laws and constitutions give rights to every CITIZEN in America. Anthony purpose is to make the woman of America realize that the treatment and limitations that hold them back are not correct because they are citizens and they deserve to be treated like one. She adopts a expressive and confident tone to encourage and light the hearts of American woman. To make her speech effective, she incorporates ethos in her speech to support her claims and reasons.
More about Speech In Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
Elie Wiesel And Susan B Anthony Essay
816 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of The Perils Of Indifference By Elie Wiesel
597 Words | 3 PagesHow Did Susan B Anthony Contribute To Women's Rights
627 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Elie Wiesel's Perils Of Indifference
453 Words | 2 PagesAnalysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech Perils Of Indifference
913 Words | 4 PagesElie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
728 Words | 3 PagesAnalysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech
1362 Words | 6 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech
552 Words | 3 PagesThe Fundamental Principle Of A Republic Summary
807 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Devices In Elie Wiesel's Speech
806 Words | 4 PagesAnalysis Of Elie Wiesel's Speech: The Perils Of Indifference
1429 Words | 6 PagesAnalysis Of Elie Wiesel's The Perils Of Indifference
861 Words | 4 PagesRhetorical Analysis Of Susan B. Anthony's Speech
991 Words | 4 PagesElie Wiesel's Speech: The Perils Of Indifference
539 Words | 3 PagesSusan B Anthony On Women's Right To Vote Analysis
814 Words | 4 Pages