Throughout the 16th to 17th century, European powers were scrambling to find opportunities in the New World. Three prominent European countries; the British, French, and Spanish, were exploring the Americas for their own personal agendas. They wanted to find ways to expand their empires and also to build their respective economies. However, they ran into the Native American populations that had settled in these “new lands.” As expected, conflict between the two groups emerged. Many conflicts between the Europeans and the Native Americans can be explained by misunderstanding and ignorance surrounding each other's culture. This is evident in the 1744 account of Sebastian de Sistiaga, a Spanish Jesuit priest who was stationed in what is currently …show more content…
He is ignorant of the large role that hunting and gathering mean to the Native people. He also does not know how Natives control the land, or how property works in their society. The cultural differences can be observed in the 1677 speech of a Mimac Elder to French Settlers in Northern New England, where he said, “Why risk thy life and thy property every year… Which is these two is the wisest and happiest - he who labours without ceasing and only obtains, and that with great trouble, enough to live on or he who rests in comfort and finds all that he needs in the pleasure of hunting and fishing?” (Deverell and Hyde 44). This Mimac Elder explains that the Natives get a feeling of satisfaction from hunting and fishing, they are not simply doing it because they need to. He explains that the Natives do not see property as important or meaningful as the Europeans do. This stance on property provides the true explanation of why Natives were “continually moving.” The Elder argues that the European ways of life are not as fulfilling as the Native ways of life. It is evident that both sides show that they had feelings that their culture was superior compared to the
The Natives wanted to continue making profit through trade such as fur trade, where beaver and otter fur were exchanged for guns, gunpowder, and other such items. As expressed in the Report of the Royal Commission to the Crown in 1677, the Indians were persistent in maintain trade even going so far as to secretly trade with English Governor of Charles County and his elite friends, even though colonists were not permitted to trade with them. This report expresses that the colonists, though they felt superior, still had some support from the Natives for desired goods. The Natives maintained this trade system, even though it upset many of the colonists because they felt the Governor was protecting the Indians rather than them, showing how a peaceful trade system was something that the Indians wanted to maintain at all costs. This document’s intended audience was the British government and King, as this was a report written to the Crown.
History is a powerful weapon usually written from the perspective of the victors and reflected in their image. The losers are rarely given the opportunity to state their side of events, but historians work to change this disparity of information and bring balance. Historians like Inga Clendinnen and Robert Ricard attempt to make sense of Native Americans’ lifestyles base on information provided by European explorers and scholars a well as remnants’ of Indigenous people. While Inga Clendinnen discusses colonial life in the Americas between 1517 to 1570, Robert Ricard focuses on describing Native American life and interactions with Spaniards from 1523 to 1572. Both Clendinnen and Ricard work to describe Native Americans in Latin Americans and
The colonizers “thirst for expansion” lead to various “encounters” with the Iroquois people, resulting with dramatic changes in territory, population, social and economic development. By examining the relationship between the colonizers and the Native American Iroquois Tribes,
Throughout history, Native Americans and Colonists have had complex relations with each other due to different cultures, values, and beliefs. As colonists started arriving in Northern America, views within the Native American tribes were split. Many natives thought the European settlers would protect them from their stronger enemies, however, others feared of their invasion on the sacred ground they lived on. Likewise, when Colonists arrived in North America, they were trying to escape religious persecution from the British and wanted to conform their newfound land to their Puritan beliefs. History of the struggle between the Colonists and Native Americans will forever be remembered through stories and the penmanship of several individuals
Throughout the seventeenth century, conflict between Europeans and Native Americans was rampant and constant. As more and more Europeans migrated to America, violence became increasingly consistent. This seemingly institutionalized pattern of conflict begs a question: Was conflict between Europeans and Native Americans inevitable? Kevin Kenny and Cynthia J. Van Zandt take opposing sides on the issue. Kevin Kenny asserts that William Penn’s vision for cordial relations with local Native Americans was destined for failure due to European colonists’ demands for privately owned land.
Part I: 1. A) Indians’ daily lives and values were similar to those of the colonists. Evidence: Rowlandson asks the Indians “whether they were earnest with God for deliverance, they told me they did as they were able…” (The Third Reserve). When Rowlandson and the Indians come across a deserted English crop field, she saw the Indians were at one with nature as the “Indians quickly spread themselves over the deserted English fields, gleaming over what they could find” (The Seventh Remove).
In history, there are conflicts and compromises. These are shown in many ways. Whether examining treaties, battles, or even speeches, there are many examples throughout time of groups having said conflicts and compromises. In this research paper, the writer will be concentrating on a certain area of history, Indian-U.S. relations. Prior to 1851 there had been many wars between the Americans and the Indians.
Since Columbus’s maiden voyages, European colonizers have maintained the mindset that any land they find they have the right to claim as their own. This was because any society discovered they considered to be subordinate to that of any major colonizer countries, no matter how developed newly discovered societies truly were. Because the colonizers held the most power in the sixteenth century, the colonizer mindset was what created the prominent depiction of the indigenous people of the Americas: unequal. The negative light shone onto the natives is seen through the Cortes and Columbus’s responses to the natives’ societies, technologies and religion. The Library of Congress possessed numerous artifacts and photographs that explain, what the
The Black Hills War, also known as the Great Sioux War of 1876, was a series of battles fought from 1876 through 1877, between the forces of the United States and their allies (Shoshone, Pawnee, and Crow) and the Sioux (Lakota, Dakota, Cheyenne, and Arapaho). Taking place under two presidencies and resulting in hundreds of casualties on both sides, The Black Hills War made great impacts that would continue to affect Natives for generations. The United State’s extensive relationship with the Native Americans has its intricacies to say the least. With the arrival of English settlers at Jamestown in 1607, there were undoubtedly uncertainties amongst the Native people as to whether or not these settlers would resemble the Spanish settlers who
I feel that a contradiction may come from a lack of involvement of women in colonial America. Though both articles emphasise a love and belief in God, though both works of literature display a love of God being displayed in a different manner. The author 's purpose is to shed light on the atrocities committed against the natives in colonial America. This may have influenced American policies to where we feel we don 't answer to anyone on earth, and we gain our power from a greater
Historians differ on what they think about the net result of the European arrival in the New World. Considering that the Columbian Exchange, which refers to “exchange of plants, animals, people, disease, and culture between Afro-Eurasia and the Americas after Columbus sailed to the Americas in 1492,” led to possibly tens of millions of deaths on the side of the American Indians, but also enabled agricultural and technological trade (Henretta et al. 42), I cannot help but reflect on whether the effects should be addressed as a historical or a moral question. The impact that European contact had on the indigenous populations of North America should be understood as a moral question because first, treating it as a historical question is difficult due to lack of reliable historical evidence; second, the meaning of compelling historical claims is contestable as the academic historian perspective tends to view the American Indian oral history as invalid; and finally, what happened to the native Indians is morally repulsive and must be discussed as such. The consequences of European contact should be answered as a moral question because historically, it is hard to be historically objective in the absence of valid and dependable historical evidence.
In the 16th Century, Spain became one of the European forces to reckon with. To expand even further globally, Spanish conquistadors were sent abroad to discover lands, riches, and North America and its civilizations. When the Spanish and Native American groups met one another, they judged each other, as they were both unfamiliar with the people that stood before them. The Native American and Spanish views and opinions of one another are more similar than different because when meeting and getting to know each other, neither the Spaniards nor the Native Americans saw the other group of people as human. Both groups of people thought of one another as barbaric monsters and were confused and amazed by each other’s cultures.
Merrell’s article proves the point that the lives of the Native Americans drastically changed just as the Europeans had. In order to survive, the Native Americans and Europeans had to work for the greater good. Throughout the article, these ideas are explained in more detail and uncover that the Indians were put into a new world just as the Europeans were, whether they wanted change or
Throughout the late 1400’s and the 1500’s, the world experienced many changes due to the discoveries of new lands and peoples that had been never been visited before. The new-found lands of the Americas and exploration of Africa by the Europeans led to new colonies and discoveries in both areas. It also brought different societies and cultures together that had never before communicated, causing conflict in many of these places. While the Europeans treated both the Native Americans and West Africans as inferior people, the early effects they had on the Native Americans were much worse. Beginning in the late 1400’s, many different European explorers started to look for new trade routes in the Eastern Hemisphere in order to gain economic and religious power.
The history of North America centers around the struggle of Spain, France, and England to gain control of the continent. Settlers and their governments used different approaches in their efforts to colonization. These differences lead to advantages and disadvantages that resulted in the New World’s fate. The Indian’s interactions with the Spanish, French, and the English varied depending on the wants and needs of the new settlers. The Indians were always very generous and welcoming to the new comers, but some of the new comers didn’t give them the same respect back.