Indian Lynching Research Paper

Second instance was the lynching of a Muslim man for stealing a cow from others stale. The media has portrayed this event in such a way that just because he is a Muslim, he was lynched. In United States and United Kingdom, the practice of lynching the persons who stole cows and horses are prevalent from centuries. The whole world has taken a bad impression of India due to this event. People have the opinion that the target group is the Muslim Group. But we cannot say that Muslims are not killed in any part of the world. For example in Saudi Arabia, Muslims groups (Sunnis and Shias) kill each other because of their difference in cultures. Then why India is being shown in a different manner? The manner in which it is portrayed is simple but

The first one is the beef ban. The common man thought that the beef was banned because India is a Hindu dominated country. So the Indian citizens cannot tolerate beef which lead the people of other religion to suffer. The Bombay High Court has specifically stated about the reasons of the beef ban. It suggested for the alternatives places for the non-productive milch animals. The slaughtering of the cows is not an integral act of the other religion. But the media has taken this judgment in such a way that now most of the Indians are against the beef ban. No one is trying to understand the rationale behind such a move. After the Bihar elections, the Chief Minister of Bihar has stated of “liquor ban” in Bihar from Apr, 2016. Now everyone is calling India as a “Country of Bans”. The liquor ban will be imposed for the welfare of the people. Nitish Kumar has promised the same during his campaign. He is ready to incur the excise loss due to this ban. But people are people. The ban is expected to work in the same way as it worked in Gujarat. They will listen to third party like media and interpret in their

This is because the phrase “reasonable restrictions” has not been defined in any part of the Constitution. There is nothing like the Indian people are intolerant of the people who are opposing or keeping their views in front of the public. There are a number of critics like Javed Akhtar, Tasleema Nasrin etc. whom our countrymen have respected from age old. There is a very thin line of difference between expressing a reasonable opinion and a radical opinion. Humans have the nature to critically analyze each and every matter from their point of view. People will believe things that are shown to them. But it lies in the hands of the media to portray something after investigating the issues from all the angels. Law has provided every safeguard to the writers, authors, poets etc. The efficiency of law depends on its users in the way that how they are using it. The welfare of the people will always be kept in priority than other things. We are not asking for any revert back of the statements. But whatever is said in public should be told keeping in mind the sensitivity of the