The Importance Of Water In T. S. Eliot

911 Words4 Pages

These two lines of Eliot exhibiting the future lethal-film of human and non-human world where the water-sound might serve the fundamental need of the water, are, in fact, indicating the masculine blindness to water. Water may live better without us but we without water, might survive for four days. It is the most significant form of nutriment in life. Surprisingly, our treatment towards water, as an inexhaustible perennial flow has brought us in such a stage where only around 3% of potable water available out of waters (sea), we’ve. The aridity of India is a masculine rather than a natural disaster. The manufacturing of deforestation and desertification for feeding the cash crops is, actually, a consequence of reductionist …show more content…

The questions like- ‘Has the mind of a human being emptied of everything? , Without Nature how can one survive? , Where should our torch of priority focus, on freedom or on need? - still seek responses from the human-world. False ideology of development, in truth, nurses the political aspect of it where it determines political leaning, framing priorities, setting cash-agendas and justifying cash-policies as welfare-policies. It can never be the social aspect of development rather, is a political propaganda. In Gift in Green, Kumaran, a typical-agent of political development, questions the identity of the water as he despises it, “Water-life…the thing had no form and shape. In pot, it resembles a pot…what is this water you’re talking about? Does it have any identity? Will it ever be something in itself? The thought of it makes me sick” (21). He schedules the progress of Aathi by planning his departure from there. But Kunjimathu, his beloved, prioritizing her small world of water, land, rice fish, paddy, lake, marshes and family, refuses to leave Aathi because she knows one thing for sure; “Water knows everything and forgets

Open Document