Arguments Against Spinoza Monism
Scrutinizing the most fundamental blocks of Spinoza’s monism In this paper, I will outline Spinoza’s first five propositions which are essential for the legitimacy of his later arguments for monism. Then I will scrutinize his definitions of the most fundamental building blocks of his argument (substance, attributes, and modes) and various axioms he offers in order to further inspect these propositions and hence evaluate their validity. First, it is crucial to define these most fundamental building blocks according to Spinoza. Substance is the most basic entity of being, and he defines it as ‘that which is in itself and is conceived through itself; that is, that the conception of which does not require the conception of another thing from which it has to be formed’ (E1D3). To clarify, ‘in itself’ means that the substance can exist independently of anything else. ‘Conceived through itself’ means that the substance does not depend of anything to be conceive of. Attribute for Spinoza is ‘that which the intellect perceives of substance as constituting its essence’ (E1D4), meaning anything through which a substance can be understood by the mind. As for mode, he means ‘the affections of substance, that is, that which is in something else and is conceived through something else’ …show more content…
It seems to challenge Spinoza’s definition of substance. I can understand that God exists (the effect), but not understand why (the cause). So in a sense, the axiom doesn’t apply to Spinoza’s definition of substance, which is conceived through itself and is its own cause. Put differently, Spinoza is suggesting that substance is the because, which is a circular argument. Also, in contrast to P3, if substances are conceived through themselves anyway, why would causation be a pre-requisite to their
The Enlightenment Dbq Essay
1560 Words | 7 PagesDuring the seventeenth century many ideas emerged that changed the way people saw the world. The Enlightenment is consider one of the breaking points in human history, the knowledge from that time influenced directly in how the events of the eighteenth, nineteenth, and consequent centuries develop till today, important ideologies like Republic emerged during this time. The introduction of the “reason” was one of the most important concepts of this movement. The “reason” proposed the arriving of a judgment through the analysis of evidence that is why the first ideas of the enlightenment were scientific ones, like Sir Isaac Newton. But this changed by the eighteenth were the philosophical ideas focused more to the human existence.
Compare And Contrast Burke And Condorcet
510 Words | 3 PagesBurke and Condorcet are two men born in the same era. While the two great philosophers had something in common, they differ a lot in the sense of their political views and many other things. In this essay, similarities and differences of the two men in terms of their actions will be analyzed. The ideas and circumstances of the two men influenced greatly on their actions.
Comparing The Tasks Of Human Will And Reason
1170 Words | 5 PagesThe Tasks of Human Will and Reason In this paper I will be addressing the fundamental roles of human will and human reason, deemed by Petrarch, a Renaissance humanist. Francesco Petrarca, better known as Petrarch was a renowned but controversial philosopher and poet. Petrarch was a heavy influencer to the Medieval humanist movement and is considered to be one of the first contributors to the extensive trend. Renaissance humanism was a profound reaction to the flawed Medieval educational institution and impaired societal practices.
Compare And Contrast Donald Davidson Theory Of Anomalous Monism
859 Words | 4 PagesThoughts have consequences. Not in the sense that my mind can telepathically bend the spoon I have in my hand. Thoughts simply cause us to act in a certain fashion. After I have formed the intention to bend my spoon, I exert enough pressure on both sides of the spoon in order to create a curvature. Thoughts cause actions and actions bring about changes in the world.
Professor Ronald Dworkin's The Model Of Rules
1406 Words | 6 PagesIn his essay The Model of Rules I, Professor Ronald Dworkin argues against a certain theory of law he attributes to H.L.A Hart called “positivism.” While Dworkin argues against many tenets of the positivist theory, I will focus this essay on critical reasons against Dworkin’s argument against the legal positivist thesis that the law consist of nothing but rules. To do so, I will explain the necessary components of Hart’s theory of law required to understand Dworkin’s rebuttal. Then, I will reconstruct Dworkin’s argument against what I will classify “nothing but rules” claim, and I will ultimate claim Dworkin’s argument fails because his premise that states principles are extra-legal and cannot be explained as part of the categories is false. In particular, I indicate how principles can be legally binding like legal rules are, and I pick apart his reasons for believing that there are clear distinctions between laws and principles.
Descartes And Paley's Argument Analysis
925 Words | 4 PagesDescartes, and Paley suggest that we can know God and that he is within our understanding. Throughout the readings they describe and argue how we can now the existence of God and the attributes that are associated with him. However David Hume would refute these claims saying through his dialogues more specifically through a character named Philo that we cannot know the attributes or even for that matter the existence. During this paper I will analyze Descartes and Paley’s arguments in comparison with David Hume’s arguments that we cannot know these things. In Paley’s argument he says that if we saw a rock lying on the ground and someone said that rock had always been there that is conceivable, whereas if a watch were lying on the ground that answer would no longer be acceptable.
Cogito In The Second Meditation By Rene Descartes
1275 Words | 6 PagesIn the Second Meditation, what is the Cogito, and what does it tell me for certain about my own existence? What is strongest and what is weakest in Descartes’ account? The second meditation is based on the connection between a conscious and an existing body. Descartes has one main problem that he wishes to solve “How can he be sure that any of his beliefs are true?”
Compare And Contrast Descartes And Francis Bacon
2041 Words | 9 PagesModern philosophy developed alongside the Scientific Revolution and both influenced and affected each other. Therefore, many of the great early philosophers were also important scientists, and, unlike Bacon, so was Descartes. Thus even though both these men share points in common, they also have many differences, either in their backgrounds or in their way of thought. We will focus mainly on comparing and contrasting the methods used by both Bacon and
Summary Of Aristotle's 'Argument Of Parmenides'
2363 Words | 10 PagesHis metaphysical position is addressed in his underlying principle of change. He felt that as equally as important as explaining the nature of reality we had to understand how the one becomes many. The main points of his philosophy are: Change is the underlying principle of all reality
Comparing Plato's Apology And Allegory Of The Cave
1373 Words | 6 PagesIn analyzing great Philosophical literature, few works are as famous as Plato's Apology and Allegory of the Cave. Although lesser known to the uninitiated to the world of Philosophy, but certainly no less famous or important, is Voltaire's Good Brahman. At first glance, each of these works appears quite different and only have the commonality of being older Philosophy texts. However, upon closer examination we find that they have more in common, despite their less obvious differences. In the following paragraphs, we will seek to explain each work individually and then compare and contrast both Philosopher's works.
President Eisenhower Speech Rhetorical Analysis
2023 Words | 9 PagesThe first example of his rationally designed statements magnifies the idea that
Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume
1404 Words | 6 PagesDescartes and Hume. Rationalism and empiricism. Two of the most iconic philosophers who are both credited with polarizing theories, both claiming they knew the answer to the origin of knowledge and the way people comprehend knowledge. Yet, despite the many differences that conflict each other’s ideologies, they’re strikingly similar as well. In this essay I will attempt to find an understanding of both rationalism and empiricism, show the ideologies of both philosophers all whilst evaluating why one is more theory is potentially true than the other.
Abhidharma Vs Madhyamaka
1526 Words | 7 PagesFinally, I will argue that while at first the Madhyamaka approach to the notion of two truths seems to be much stronger and more coherent than the Abhidharma approach, the Abhidharma approach is stronger in the end. Notably,
Advantages And Disadvantages Of Comrrespondence Theory
737 Words | 3 PagesOne of the hottest concepts or a matter of discussion in the field of philosophy is that of “truth.” Several theories tried to explain it including the Pragmatic Theory and Correspondence theory; however they are all agree that talking about the truth is a very difficult topic to be discussed about. In this paper, I am going to explore the concept of truth in the light of the Correspondence Theory by identifying its major strengths and weaknesses. The correspondence theory is the one that most people would more likely rely on or agree about, but it contains plenty of problems or non-answered questions.
Essay On Monism Vs Dualism
1225 Words | 5 PagesAn issue in theoretical basis on what should prevail or which is supreme between International Law or Municipal Law (national law) is usually presented as a competition between monism and dualist. But in modern approach there is now the theory of coordination or is also called Harmonization theory that rejects the presumption of the other two theoretical concept, monism and dualism. The monist view asserts the international law’s supremacy over the municipal law even in matters within the internal or domestic jurisdiction of a state. While it is true that the international law defines the legal existence of states as well of the validity of its national legal order, the dualist asserts the international law is an existing system that is completely separated from municipal or national law. That dictates the
More about Arguments Against Spinoza Monism
The Enlightenment Dbq Essay
1560 Words | 7 PagesCompare And Contrast Burke And Condorcet
510 Words | 3 PagesComparing The Tasks Of Human Will And Reason
1170 Words | 5 PagesCompare And Contrast Donald Davidson Theory Of Anomalous Monism
859 Words | 4 PagesProfessor Ronald Dworkin's The Model Of Rules
1406 Words | 6 PagesDescartes And Paley's Argument Analysis
925 Words | 4 PagesCogito In The Second Meditation By Rene Descartes
1275 Words | 6 PagesCompare And Contrast Descartes And Francis Bacon
2041 Words | 9 PagesSummary Of Aristotle's 'Argument Of Parmenides'
2363 Words | 10 PagesComparing Plato's Apology And Allegory Of The Cave
1373 Words | 6 PagesPresident Eisenhower Speech Rhetorical Analysis
2023 Words | 9 PagesCompare And Contrast Descartes And Hume
1404 Words | 6 PagesAbhidharma Vs Madhyamaka
1526 Words | 7 PagesAdvantages And Disadvantages Of Comrrespondence Theory
737 Words | 3 PagesEssay On Monism Vs Dualism
1225 Words | 5 Pages