Spoilers In Negotiation Essay

1232 Words5 Pages

INTRODUCTION
Negotiation is defined as the process by which two or more conflicting parties decide to discuss their differences within a contracted structure to find a suitable resolution to their demands. Negotiation have different forms so it can be a direct negotiation or with the involvement of third-party facilitation. We are narrowing our debate on focusing the role of spoiler as a third party involvement in a negotiation process by following certain limits as we are directed to do so. This research focuses on the roles that spoilers play during a dialogue. Considering the relevant literature has shown a high correlation between the participation of third parties and peace talks’ success rates, one evident explanation for the high …show more content…

Another factor could be linked to the presence of third parties when they contribute in peace process processes. Some of the most frequent causes of crisis in the negotiations are the parties’ lack of confidence in the assisting third party. This research addresses the functions that third parties can perform in a peace process. This research aim to discover significant theories, review the most significant features of peace negotiations and talks the roles and behaviour of spoilers in negotiation to meet their interests. This research extensively based on the literature which consists of three article related to the presence of spoiler in peace process. .I use the following three articles to evaluate the role of spoiler in peace process and debate will Include different strategies to overcome their presence and make the peace process successful. I use the following …show more content…

Stedman
The Role Played by ‘spoilers’ in Peace Processes by DANIEL GRAY

This study will scan the role of the actors who energetically pursue to hamper, delay, or weaken conflict settlement’ [ii] due to many reasons and by a different methods. This essay talks Stephen Stedman’s term ‘spoiler’ to classifying such actors.[1]
This paper critically analyised of Stedman work; mainly by Marie-Joëlle Zahar and Feargal Cochrane.they use a similar model of investigating spoiler behaviour as Stedman, but by implementing independent and new contemporary thinking. I will observe more thoroughly the characters that spoilers have and the consequences they have over a number of peace accords.this analysis aim to classify apprehensions over simplification in outdated discussions on spoilers and the disputed negotiation used to quantify confrontations to peace.
Location of the Spoiler
The location of the spoiler is also equally significant in this discussion. The author of the article quote that Stedman recognizes the locations of spoilers describing in two ways, inside and outside. Inside spoilers are the actors who are involved in the peace negotiations pretend their enthusiasm to find a peaceable solution but later fail to fulfil significant responsibilities to agreement.[vii] While outside spoilers are those actors who are excluded from the

Open Document