Sprigg's Argument Analysis
Sprigg’s viewpoint is that “homosexual relationships are not marriage because they are not between the union of a man and a woman and that homosexual relationships are harmful because they do not provide the same benefits to society as heterosexual marriages, but their consequences are far more negative than positive” (Finsterbusch, 2012, p.124).
Sprigg’s comments are supported by figures on higher rates of diseases, higher rates of mental health issues, and national opinion polls that say people do not support gay marriage. He has some valid points and does have his opinion about the subject. However, when it comes to same-sex marriages I am divided on this subject for different reasons. First, I think we should not judge people or what they
…show more content…
Health insurance, estate taxes, family leave, and pensions are some of the issues that arise with benefits to name a few examples. Furthermore, I can see why these issues do come into the equation and because of that couples should be allowed to marry and have the same entitlements.
Some of the questions in the post referred to if the laws were changed and domestic partners benefits did have equal rights in every state, would same-sex couples want to get married? My viewpoint on this is they would not have to get married then if it was only about the benefits and they could get them without marriage, however, that is not the answer because couples want to get married because they love each other, so that is not solving the whole issue.
The aspect of other types of relationships, defining a family, and where we draw boundaries does need to be considered also because you open up a whole different scope of types of relationships that will argue with some of the same issues and I cannot say that agree with all that, so it puts me in an awkward position because if I agree with one thing how can I not support others and in the end it is all about my own opinion and judgment and it is alright to agree or disagree!
General Zaroff Argumentative Analysis
392 Words | 2 PagesSecondly, General Zaroff evokes a level of terror never experienced before by the victim. When Rainsford first meets General Zaroff, he thinks of him as an affable man but really the General has been waiting to hunt Rainsford ever since he entered the house. As the General and Rainsford are talking about hunting General Zaroff reveals that hunting animals does not interest him anymore. The general said “We will have some capital hunting, you and I” (Connell 6). This statement makes Rainsford nervous because the General says he does not hunt animals anymore but he still hunts a very dangerous game.
Legal Case: Thea V. Windsor
293 Words | 2 PagesSince the 1970’s people have been going to court to ask the government to legalize gay marriage. From the cases in 1970’s like Loving v. Virginia and the more recent cases like United States v. Edith Windsor. In this case, Windsor and Thea were a same sex couple who were married in Canada, but they lived in New York which recognized their marriage. After Thea passed away, the estate was left with Windsor. Under federal law their marriage was not recognized, so Windsor was asked to pay taxes on the estate.
Kim Davis Arguments
558 Words | 3 PagesIn 2015, it was legalized in all fifty states. This allowed hundreds and hundreds of people to marry their spouse and have it be on paper like everyone else has the right to do. In an article on this hot topic they say, “ Now that we have moved into the bright sunshine of marriage equality, we’re not likely to move back to the closet and the shadows” (US News). If they know that it’s the law and know we will most likely not return to the old ways, why fight
Susie O Brien Use Of Ethos Pathos Logos
910 Words | 4 PagesSusie O’Brien’s article ‘It’s time to honour gay couples and allow them to marry’ The Advertiser, November 20, 2010, p. 27) is an argument about gay couples not being able to marry legally like their heterosexual counterparts, O’Brien calls it discrimination and states that the government need to change the laws in order for equality. O’Brien doesn’t have very factually strong arguments so to make her opinion justified she uses personal stories and emotive language to persuade the reader which is an appeal of pathos. O’Brien opens her argument with two personal stories. The first story she uses is how as a child she never had to choose to be straight and that she could never imagine being discriminated for something she had no control over.
Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study
1057 Words | 5 PagesThis analyses that same sex couples should also have the right to marry. One of the reason why the supreme court sided with Loving was because “Decisions about marriage are among the most intimate that an individual can
Russel Vought Argument Analysis
750 Words | 3 PagesIn this article, the senator Bernie Sanders had a strong debate with the nominee to deputy by the president donald trump, russel Vought; about a post made by russel bought in 2016 implying that the Islamic community did not know Christ, and that's why they were going to be condemned. What Sanders considered discriminatory towards the Islamic community, and unleashed a long debate that had nothing to do with the current topic which was relevant to Russell's role in government. This discussion caused controversy because Senator Bernie Sanders was accused by some people of violating article IV of the constitution. This is a very complex issue because the statements made by Vought can be taken in many different ways because they are related to
Obergefell V. Hodges (2005)
2137 Words | 9 PagesHodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial
Morenoff And Astor Argumentative Analysis
558 Words | 3 PagesDaniel Garcia TH 1:30-2:50pm March 14, 2017 Advanced Concepts in Criminal Justice From the works of Morenoff and Astor, we are to explain why crime might be higher among second generation immigrant Americans. Though there are many assimilation theories which coincides with this, Portes and Zhou’s theory of segmented assimilation stands up to be the strongest of them all. My reasoning behind it is based on the array of the data from Morenoff and Astor collected in this article and my own interpretation which I experienced first hand. The article shows segmented assimilation branching out to two main scenarios of the straight line assimilation, the positive and the negative. Segmented assimilation is carried though by the immigrants themselves or by their offspring adopting aspects of the culture in which they 're residing in.
Behaving Like Animals In Brad Watson's Water Dog God
1310 Words | 6 PagesHumans like to think of themselves as moral, upstanding beings who cognitively and rationally function, but often they are accused of “behaving like animals.” This rationale is a social construct that encompasses the behaviors of people found as unacceptable and shameful to the average population. Although it appears demeaning to compare animals in such a critical manner, there is a clear separation between man and animal that places humans much higher on the scale of civilization. As illustrated in “Water Dog God” by Brad Watson, the lack of civilized presence among people damages the ability for one to understand proper conduct, leading to animal-like behaviors such as the absence of relationship boundaries, limited emotional availability, and no concept of hygiene or social norms. Further, the short story emphasizes the affects of various boundaries that humans cross easily and often due to their distorted nature.
Republican's Party Arguments
630 Words | 3 PagesI am a right wing Libertarian which is the Democratic Party. The democratic party was made back in 1792 to combat Republicans who supported Thomas Jefferson. At that time the Democratic party often referred to its own party as “The White man 's Party” because the Republicans at the time mostly lived in the South and favored slavery unlike Democrats. I Believe as one person that we should have same sex marriage legalized. Saying two people can 't be married based off it being wrong and preachers unwilling to want to wed them based on their religion is ridiculous.
Julian Savulescu's Argument Analysis
492 Words | 2 PagesJulian Savulescu argues that genetic enhancement is not only morally permissible, but it is morally obligatory to genetically enhance one’s own child. Savulescu presents three points to defend his claim, but his vague language causes his argument to be unacceptable. Savulescu’s three arguments are as follows. His first argument is about parental duty to fulfill their child’s needs.
Individualisation And Its Effects On Families And Relationships Essay
541 Words | 3 Pages58). Marriage is no more about social status or an economical arrangement and individuals are able to deconstruct the orthodox notion of intimate life by liberalizing sexual relations with the same sex and commit to cohabitation (Allan and Crow 2001, p. 81). Homosexual relationships are another form of the nuclear family frame where artificial insemination and surrogacy are ways for both lesbian and gay couples to become parents. This notion of individualisation is reflected in television series such as “Modern Family” where there is a typical nuclear family but with a homosexual gay couple as parents to a girl. The family in the series has been constructed to resemble a nuclear family but their homosexuality in itself is a form of
More about Sprigg's Argument Analysis
General Zaroff Argumentative Analysis
392 Words | 2 PagesLegal Case: Thea V. Windsor
293 Words | 2 PagesKim Davis Arguments
558 Words | 3 PagesSusie O Brien Use Of Ethos Pathos Logos
910 Words | 4 PagesObergefell V. Hodges: Case Study
1057 Words | 5 PagesDe Gante's Letter To Fay Pedro De Acosta
1559 Words | 7 PagesRussel Vought Argument Analysis
750 Words | 3 PagesObergefell V. Hodges (2005)
2137 Words | 9 PagesMorenoff And Astor Argumentative Analysis
558 Words | 3 PagesBehaving Like Animals In Brad Watson's Water Dog God
1310 Words | 6 PagesPolitical Participation In Texas
660 Words | 3 PagesRepublican's Party Arguments
630 Words | 3 PagesEmmett Till Essay Thesis
1888 Words | 8 PagesJulian Savulescu's Argument Analysis
492 Words | 2 PagesIndividualisation And Its Effects On Families And Relationships Essay
541 Words | 3 Pages