Ontological Argument In Favour Of God's Existence

1016 Words5 Pages
Ontological argument by St. Anselm in favour of God’s existence:
The ontological argument of the existence of the God is entirely based upon the fact of contradicting the non-existence of God. The original statement on which St. Anselm’s ontological argument of God is based upon is that "God is that than which no greater can be conceived." The statement means that there cannot be a being which can be greater than God and there cannot be a being which can be imagined greater than a God as God is treated as an ultimate perfect being that can be imagined. One of the prominent feature that God has is perfection i.e., something can’t be called a God unless it’s completely perfect. Perfection implies that there cannot be something which is greater than perfection or being flawless.
It is supposed that God exists as an idea in the mind. If we suppose the fact that God exists in reality then the ' reality ' becomes an additional feature which the non-existing God doesn 't have and which can be imagined for a being (suppose X )who has one more extra feature than the God. So the God becomes imperfect as we can imagine a being X who is greater than God by a feature other than what the God have. So it questions the premises on which the fact "no greater than God can be conceived" was
…show more content…
Basic assumption which we believe in is that God created the world. Here the world is considered as the most marvelous achievement that can be imagined. And the ability of the creator is one of the major contributing factors for the merit of an achievement besides its intrinsic quality. Merit of the achievement increases with the disability of its creator i.e., more handicap the creator is, much higher the merit or the impressiveness of the achievement. For example a pot made by a potter man with no limbs is considered a higher achievement than a pot made by a fit and normal potter
Open Document