Although it is not always considered, individuals are all members of different groups and communities. At the University of Oklahoma, qualified persons can involve themselves with a wide variety of discourse communities. In such groups, there are practices, concerns, traditions, history, beliefs, and ultimately something held in common that binds them all together. One such discourse community is St. Thomas More University Parish. As a Catholic Church, St. Thomas More is a community that provides services to the Catholic students attending the University of Oklahoma. The discourse community of St. Thomas More University Parish is a growing parish that is encouraging involvement and spiritual development.
Before delving into the discourse community,
…show more content…
Gee argues that, “The key to Discourses is ‘recognition,’ If you put language, action, interaction, values, beliefs, symbols, objects, tools, and places together in such a way that others recognize you as a particular type of who (identity) engaged in a particular type of what (activity), here-and-now, then you have pulled off a Discourse (and thereby continued it through history, if only for a while longer).” (Gee, p. 446). Consistent with Gee’s argument that recognition is crucial to a Discourse community, Catholics are recognized and socially identify by their beliefs and rituals (Gee, p. 442). Traditionally, Catholic Churches have a set meeting place to offer Mass that is held on Sundays. In addition, Catholics have specified times when they abstain from certain activities or consumption of different items. Kane named one such instance when she said, “Lent is one of the biggest Catholic tradition. This is where you give up something for 40 days to relate to Jesus’s suffering that he felt during the 40 days in the desert. This is done before Easter.” (Kane). Catholics have countless set traditional practices and beliefs that are not familiar to outsiders. According to Kane, Lent is one of the most significant practices …show more content…
Thomas More’s Discourse community incorporates what Gee referred to as “conversations” within their community; this is a highly discussed topic (Gee, p. 441-2). In the early 1920s, the University of Oklahoma students began to petition to the Bishop to create a university parish for the Catholic students. The Archdiocese of Oklahoma City took on this project to create a parish for the Catholic students of the University of Oklahoma. Now, it is estimated that the parish has over six-thousand members (St. Thomas More). With St. Thomas More and the University of Oklahoma growing, the priest has announced several times during their Sunday Mass that the church is hard-pressed to maintain enough space to serve all of their members. By even visiting the church, the lack of seating is easily observed. Kane says that this reoccurring topic of conversation and the solution for this problem is the community’s main priority. Because of this, expanding the church and how to maintain the expansion is highly discussed amongst the community members (Kane). Without the necessary funds to expand, the church will remain the same; St. Thomas More is accepting donations for their expansion in order to better serve the people of its
For me, the logos, pathos and ethos perspective of joining a discourse community I had been part of, taught me a lesson about interpersonal skills, organizational systems and professionalism. My aim of this paper is to share my experience of joining Chitwan Pharmacy Student Association (CPSA) via use of rhetorical skills that we have discussed in class of English 1301.
The vision and mission of the Catholic Church is “to be a sign and instrument of communion with God and unity among all people,” (Archdiocese of Sydney). "Having been divinely sent to the nations that she might be the universal sacrament of salvation,” (Catechism of the Church, par. 849). The church works towards this mission by addressing various social justice issues, one of which is discrimination. Discrimination can be defined as the unjust treatment of an individual or a group of people based on their race, gender, ethnicity or skin colour. Some prominent examples of discrimination in our modern world include racism, ethnic and religious intolerance, and currently the national rising issue of refugees and asylum seekers.
We communicate in many ways, either by email, telephone, text, face to face, social media or letters and the language we use allows us to get things done, nonetheless the language and communication method in which we chose to use can vary depending on the discourse community. Much like John Swales suggests a discourse community involves a group of people who share the same common public goals, such as shared interests, rules, structure, and vocabulary. When thinking about the several discourse communities I am evolved in, which include family, coaching football, college student, and a few friends. These discourse communities have influenced me, given me insight of where I come from and tell who I am as a person. I also believe much like Swales,
In the article "The Concept of a Discourse Community" by John Swales (1990). He aimed to define the meaning of a discourse community; then he carefully deconstructs discourse community into six fundamental attributes that are important for recognizing a discourse community. Swales’ definition of a discourse community is a group that has objectives or purposes, and utilize communication to accomplish those objectives. He states that a discourse community is presented as a more practical and purposeful gathering than speech fraternity or speech group. The six essential characteristics that Swales (1990) belief to be the core of a discourse community are its goals, intercommunication, participation, genres, Lexis, and expertise.
An important discourse community that was a part of my life was my volleyball team during my four years of high school. I started playing my first year going into high school and continued until I graduated. Until now I wasn’t even aware that would even be considered a discourse community, but it fits all of the qualifications of Swales’ definition of a discourse community. Goals
Creations, like most things in life, are improvable. Ideas and theories are always evolving into different ideas or more sophisticated ones. Discourse communities is a term that has been debated over the years. Three of those debaters are James Paul Gee, James P. Porter, and John Swales. In this essay I will analyze what each of these writers see as the definition of a discourse community while comparing specific points that each of them have regarding their personal view on the subject.
What is occurring are distinct approaches of engagement. One pastor described the challenges of ministering in a local church in the Barcelona area, by describing the cultural barrier between the church and the community. Interest in God is not the obstacle but how the discussion occurs. Language and rituals employed in the congregation form a wall or barrier. Those outside the church are likewise erecting a wall.
In Walter Brueggemann’s essay “Biblical Authority,” he points out that the biblical text is “the live word of the living God.” Depending on the eyes reading, the Bible can be taken in many different ways. The stories of people’s lives lead to seeing the text in ways that others cannot. Brueggemann’s life story has led him to discover six features of interpretation of the Bible that may be helpful to all.
Sir Thomas More, the great English social philosopher, humanist and saint, once said “I die the king’s faithful servant, but Gods first” (The Thomas More Society)Thomas More was a great and notable figure in the Catholic Church because of his great actions for and to the church. More’s religious and educational journey started at a very young age; born and raised in London, More attended the best schools and through his education developed into the great scholar he is known to be in the Catholic Church. From the start, More was recognized and grew up to be a a great and remarkable scholar. Thomas More’s contributions to Catholicism, such as his famous pieces of writing and dialogues he used to defend the church led him to be a great saint
Methodology The Four Theological Voices Model The Four Theological Voices Model was developed by the Action Research: Church and Society team (ARCS), consisting of Helen Cameron, Deborah Bhatti, Catherine Duce, James Sweeney and Clare Watkins. In the book Talking about God in Practice, the ARCS team explains four theological voices which they discovered as they examined the practice of the Church. The four voices are: (i) normative theology, (ii) formal theology, (iii) espoused theology and (iv) operant theology.3 Cameron et al argue that these voices are intertwined, and that together they express the whole of Christian theology.4 The team 's main thesis is that practice is essentially theology, and that theology subsequently is embodied throughout the life of the Church and expressed in the lived practice of the Church through these four theological voices.5 Cameron et al is clear that this model should not be seen a complete description, but rather serve as a interpretative working tool for theological reflection upon how practice and theology are connected.6 Critique of the method While Cameron et al do not explicitly describe any specific direction of movement in the communication between the four voices, they argue that there may be a rather significant relationship between the normative and formal theology on the one hand, and the espoused and operant theology on the other.7 They also suggest that the model enables a challenging of formal and normative
As part of the hegemonic confessional ritual, Knowledge suggests to Everyman to make his sins known to all, including God. Everyman responds to Knowledge: “In the name of the Holy Trinity, My body sore punished shall be: Take this, body, for the sin of the flesh!” (Everyman 611-13). Everyman performs a self-injurious ritual where the audience and x other characters on stage are witness to his petition for r forgiveness for the way that he has lived.. Medieval Christians believed that the only way to serve penance for one’s sins was to undergo flagellation between one and forty times.
“Just sitting here with you has given me some sound advice that I think a lot of Catholics should keep in mind, when it comes to the New Evangelization. Although the examples we have raised for the past several hours may not make any sense to the casual observer, the one who understands the gist of what we had said to each other, carefully observing for the past several hours, will surely know what we meant.” “Precisely,” remarked Walther. “For the New Evangelization to be successful, the materials on which the evangelization efforts are to be made must both be coordinated and be relatable to the people that the effort is being geared toward. There was a very good reason why the Holy Spirit gave the Apostles the ability to speak in many different languages (Acts 2:4, NABRE).
Thanks giving as a religious phenomenon The life of most people in the United States of America were driven by a number of theories as well as some believes. Life revolved around these theories that in many cases tried to explain certain behaviors that took place within the society. People believed in various religions that at the same had different practices. Christians, Muslims and other believers had their own perceptions towards certain phenomenon.
Theologians today differ as to what should be stressed in the priesthood: priests as preachers of the word of God, the cultic or sacramental ministry of the priests, and priests as leaders of the community of the believers. For many priests today, questions remain about their identity precisely as priests. The expectations of the laity regarding their priests have today become varied (Dulles,
An overview of Homiletics: Historical, Theological and Homiletic Development and Significance. Introduction: Preaching is the central acts of Christianity Preaching is a vehicle for promoting the changes in the churches as well as in society. Preaching also assumes that it is the fundamental aspects of the church. The church cannot function properly without the direction of it. .