Stage 2: Communication In this stage the responding officers communicate with the suspects by give them commands (Butler, n.d., p. 20). These commands are given in an attempt to gain the individuals cooperation (Butler, n.d., p. 20).
Stage 3: Physical Control Physical control is when an officer goes hands on with a subject in order to gain control of the situation (Butler, n.d., p. 20). Physical control can be further broken down into soft methods and hard methods (Butler, n.d., p. 20). Soft methods of physical control that officers use involve pressure points, control tactics and handcuffs (Butler, n.d., p. 20). Hard methods are used when an individual is failing to comply with officers’ verbal commands (Butler, n.d., p. 20). These methods
…show more content…
20). When an officer deploys one of these devices there is a higher chance that the suspect will suffer as a result (Butler, n.d., p. 20). In the majority of these situations death is not a likely outcome, yet it cannot be completely eliminated as these rare occurrences do occur (Butler, n.d., p. 20). Intermediate weapons are deployed when a suspect has failed to listen to officer’s command and is displaying aggressive behavior (Butler, n.d., p. 20).
Stage 5: Lethal Force Officers deploy lethal force when they believe their own life is at risk or when a member of societies life is at risk (Butler, n.d., p. 3). The primary lethal force method that most officers rely on is their primary or secondary firearm (Butler, n.d., p. 8). Use of Force Issues Uses of force issues have always been present within the world of policing. Recently, there has been more light shed on this particular issues. With all the media and social activist groups police have to be more careful of their conduct. Society is quick to jump the gun how officers act in particular situations.
Excessive
…show more content…
Police officers deal with individuals who are suffering from mental health conditions on a daily basis (Lacobucci, 2014, p.95). In 2013 the Mobile Crisis Intervention Team Committee concluded that our health care system and law enforcement agencies must work hand in hand in order to deal with mental health issues in an adequate manner (as cited Lacobucci, 2014, p. 93). Police officers are mandated to run individuals names and to check their backgrounds when they are dealing with them (Lacoubucci, 2014, p.97). In any call the background of an individual can be of great help, it can assist the officer in deciding if he or she needs to deploy force and if so how much (Lacoubucci, 2014, p. 97) When officers are responding to situations, which involve suicidal individuals, guns, a violent or mentally ill offender there is a high possibility that the emergency response team will be dispatched (Lacobucci, 2014, p. 97). The deployment of the emergency response team can play a big role in how the situation ends. It can be concluded that ERT members are highly trained and have extensive amounts of experience; this decreases the chance of excessive force being used (Lacobucci, 2014, p.97). Toronto police service has the availability of mobile crisis intervention teams (Lacobucci, 2014, p. 99.) These teams are made up of one police constable and one registered nurse (Lacobucci, 2014, p. 99). These teams play a critical role within the police services
In the model it urges the officer to consider specific factors before determining if force is necessary to cause compliance. The factors that the officer must consider are “the severity of the crime, if there is a flight risk or the resistance of arrest”. Deadly force in Minnesota is permitted only if it serves in “protecting the officer from death or bodily harm, effect the arrest or capture, or prevent the escape, of a person whom the officer knows or has reasonable grounds to believe has committed or attempted to commit a felony. For example, if the suspect used or threatened to use lethal force, or if the police officer believes that the suspect will cause death or great bodily if they are not apprehended”. The policy encourages the police officer, if feasible to issue verbal warnings before using deadly
How do police decide how much force should be used in a situation and how has that changed throughout the year? Has Tennessee v. Garner been effective in protecting individuals against excessive force? Before the case Tennessee v Garner in 1985, how to police decided if they should use deadly force determined by one of four groups; these four groups were The Any-felon Rule; The defense-of-life Rule; The Forcible Felony Rule, and The Model Penal Code. The extreme one was the Any-Felony Rule which was “English common law authorized officers to use any means necessary to arrest felony suspects or prevent them from fleeing. In the United States, courts interpreted this rule as legal permission to shoot an unarmed felony suspect in flight” (Tennenbaum)
In today’s modern society, many feel that is okay for a police officer can kill a man armed with a harmful weapon at any cost. On many news channels, there are various amounts of articles and reports about a police officer committing this act. Even though a police officer has the right to take action against an armed man, this could be argued in many circumstances. In the 2013, Sammy Yatim was a young adult with a mental illness and was armed with a weapon on a streetcar in Toronto. Yatim was confronted by Const.
I have a complaint, and wish a legal ruling prior to allowing a Correctional Officer to become involved in a legal battle or worse yet, injured: Currently, the Department of Corrections has the authority and directives for Officers to use force within the building or confines of their building. In some instances, where perimeter patrols are on duty, use of force directives apply. There are strict directives for Certified Officers to use force. When certified as a PTO and off institutional grounds these directives again apply. Moreover, these directives apply directly to those inmates who are property remand into the custody of the State.
One common opinion is that officers should not use more force than is necessary or reasonable, and even then, that force should be used only as a last resort. “Police use force to affect civilians’ conduct. On a day-to-day basis, they do so most often by employing the least degree of force available to them, their mere presence. Cops wear uniforms and drive distinctly marked cars so that, without saying a word, they may have an effect on citizens’ behavior” (Fyfe, 38). When an officer’s presence fails to fulfill the desired conduct, the next course of action for said officer would be verbalization.
The way officers use power should be used in certain situations but, all situations don’t need force. Police brutality is cruel; as the police are paid to protect people from danger, not bring on additional harm and stretch. Police should be prepared and trained the right way, so they don't use extra force. Police are put on a grid of power and so we expect. Over
While both talk about using different tools and equipment on another person, St. Paul Police Department also mentions the use of command presence and verbalization.
Some people argue that the tactics used by the police
“Deadly force is generally defines as any force that can reasonably be expected to cause death or serious bodily injury (Petrocelli, 2005).”It is to be utilized by law enforcement as a last resort, therefore, before a police officer goes the route of using deadly force, they must use all non-deadly force strategies unless they feel imminent danger is going to take place. There is no doubt that law enforcement officers will be faced with multiple challenges that put their lives on the line. Law enforcement officers deal with a multitude of dangers everyday, which is why they are trained to know what to do in hostile situations. When it comes to deadly force, the traditional rule of thumb for officers is tat it is allowed if the officer reasonably believes that the person of interest has committed a crime or is going to commit a crime. But how can the officer know for sure?
Thorough studies examine that the distribution of less-lethal weapons have reduced issues such as assaults on specifically police officers, other studies examine that this is increasing the death and injuries of civilians rather than focusing primarily on the safety of officers employed for the police force. It is a growing problem in the United States with increasing health issues related to the cause of police use of force in incidents that occur regularly. It is important to consider whether these less-lethal weapons are associated with the like hood of injuries. The use of force can define a wide range of different variables of force; it is vital to assess the independent contribution of less-lethal weapons on the prevalence and incidence of injury to the suspects and officers involved. Less- lethal weapons have increased the odds of injury to suspects that may be life threatening, it is most likely essential for these officers to stick to less-lethal weapons which can be classified as OC sprays or CEDs.
The importance and prevalence of use of force by police is crucial to the community. With the usage of force, there are three forms, which are self-defense, people could use force against specifically such as prison guards, police force (White, 2015). Several law enforcement agencies use the method of TASER as another force option. There are several pros and cons when it comes to talking about TASER (Rappert, 2004). With the advantages with TASER being used, the TASER would attack the attacker without a high potential of killing them.
For decades now, the controversy over deadly force has continued to show up in the news when police officers have acted in a manner that some citizens find just while others deem completely unfair. Many lawsuits stemming from shootings and crimes have found their way to local courts or the Supreme Court to deal with this issue. A portion of the U.S. population finds deadly force unnecessary when non-lethal weapons such as pepper spray or batons just as easily subdue the criminal. In addition, these citizens argue that officers might be liable for cases filed against them if they use excess force on people that seem suspicious but have not actually committed a crime. On the other hand, the opposing argument in favor of deadly force states that
Problem-oriented policing, also known as operational strategies, have five core elements: preventive patrol, routine incident response, emergency response, criminal investigation, and problem solving. In addition to the five core strategies, there is also a lone ancillary operation strategy, support services. Law enforcement officers use this to help prevent crime by being pro-active and responding to calls. The first of the core operational strategies is the prevention patrol. Prevention patrol is an active response and most dominate operation of police strategy.
The reason as to why police brutality is unethical is simple. It kills a lot of people and is not necessary. However, what are the reasons as to why police brutality has become such a problem in the United States? One can argue the police officers take advantage of how much authority their occupation comprises of. If a cop shoots and murders a person, they claim that they were using self-defense or some other kind of excuse.
Throughout this last year there has been mass news and social media coverage involving police officer 's use of deadly force in the United