He developed a logical model for judging whether a particular action should be attributed to some (feature/ quality/ trait) of the person or the surrounding conditions. The term covariation simply means that a person has information from many instances observation, at different times and situations, and can perceive the covariation of an observed effect and its causes. He argues that in trying to discover the causes of behavior people take into account three kinds of evidence. Kelley believed that there were three types of causal information which influenced our judgments; consensus, distinctiveness and consistency. People attribute things causing other things to happen on the basis of relationship.
Democracy- the best form of governance; is evidently disputed in modern day politics. The disagreement has been carried on for centuries, as seen in Plato 's Republic and Pericles Speeches. According to The Republic, democracy cannot be implemented as the common man lacks the in-depth knowledge of vital spheres of bureaucracy such as economics, military stratagem, international conditions, and the niceties of law. However, this form of governance is viewed in a much more favorable light by Pericles in Thucydides ' History of the Peloponnesian Wars. He believes democracy is all beneficial to every sector of society and should be run for the general well-being, serving the ultimate goal of equality in justice.
Novak and Canas, (2008) identified three characteristic features of concept maps as indicated below: 1. Concept Maps are represented in a hierarchical structure with the most inclusive, and general concept at the top of the map, while the more specific, less general concepts are arranged hierarchically below. The hierarchical structure for a particular domain of knowledge also depends on the context in which that knowledge is being applied or considered. 2. There is the inclusion of cross links.
Both Machiavelli and Plato would find it necessary to have their ruler have total power. For Plato the logical because no one else is fit into this rule except those who do; therefore, they should have the power. For Machiavelli it is because the ruler—via himself— acts in the interest of the people. Furthermore, Machiavelli and Plato agree that virtue is needed to create a good civilization. Without virtue, each and every civilization would fall if its rulers are unjust and do not conform to the rules of the land.
Stakeholder analysis (also called stakeholder mapping) is a method of determining the levels of interest and influence an individual, group, or organization have in an information system development as defined in Bourne, (2010). Stakeholder analysis is a method that prompt project team members understand different stakeholders interests in a project and increase the chances of producing a successful product. It helps in deciding which stakeholders might have the most influence over the success or failure of project, the most influential supporters or principled opponents. De Baar (2006) elaborated it more as a technique to identify and analyze the information on stakeholders surrounding a project, their relationships, interests, and expectations
The government only has the right to be forceful because they are stronger and more powerful than him. Thoreau, on the other hand, was not going to be forced to do anything. This is why he protested by not paying a poll tax, and ended up in jail for one night. He would rather them have his life than his money. INTRO TO Research That Supports/Helps Explain 2nd Quote:__________________________________ RESEARCH QUOTE: ______________________________________________________________________(
As there are no arguments, they can plan for the long term immediately and approach development problems in an adaptive way that can earn income and provide benefits for the mass of the population. Just look at the countries: Germany, USSR, Korea, and Singapore. However, this system also means violence and war, since this government encourages aggression, and in the Philippines, an authoritarian alternative is not sustainable enough since no one would want to repeat Marcos’ Martial Law all over again; it would not be of help in our current state, and no one would like to have their rights be taken away. Not all authoritarian regimes succeeded, majorities have failed as well. Probably in all aspects, we cannot compare our country to another since our country is an archipelago and for that, it is harder to control.
Even if we assume, however, that Hobbes’ state of nature is true, it still would not justify obeying a tyrannical government. Having to live under a tyrannical government that does not protect one’s rights is in no way better than having to compete with other people for survival. In competing with other people, at least everyone is on equal footing. However, when competing against a government, then there is a power imbalance and the government can use its power to oppress the people. Therefore, the people should have the right to rebel against such a government.
It may be true that if we knew everything about the relevant events and conditions we may predict actions with certainty. However, the "if" in the determinist statement will always remain since nobody and in no way possible can they ever obtain all the knowledge required to determine an action. Therefore, although in theory the determinists seem to have the upper hand, in reality they don't. Thus, the empty space left due to lack of information about the previous events is filled with free will, and more importantly, responsibility (Solomon, 2002). The second argument is made by redefining freedom.
The tiger team needs to ensure the vision aligns to the current DLA strategic plan and make sure the vision can be understood and followed. Next, senior leadership must empower their managers through employees to be able to facilitate the implementation of the vision to achieve the recommendations. This is important to be able to expedite the implementation and realize short-term wins as soon as