PART 2 – LEARNING LOG 1. Literature Review ASSIGNMENT BRIEF In the 1980s, Freeman introduced stakeholder theory, which led to the development of the notion of the response organization and, it is argued, ultimately, the introduction of the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). se and synthesis? APPROACH Stage 1 – Search for Literature 1. Lookup Stakeholder Theory on Google Scholar 2. Narrow search based on theme of interest within stakeholder theory 3. Search for quality journals related to theme of interest 4. Narrow down to ¾ journals that are high quality, check against ABS list Stage 2 – Report on Literature Search 5. Explain what steps you took to locate your final selection of papers 6. Include the keywords you employed …show more content…
• The main area of interest, being instrumental stakeholder theory is defined within the confines of connections or lack thereof and the achievement of traditional corporation objectives (p71) • The writers set out at the onset that the extent to which stakeholder theory is understood to represent a controversial to conventional views varies greatly among market capitalist economies varies greatly (p69). This may be read in direct reference to Friedman’s theory [reference point here]. • Whilst conclusions firms up the writers’ argument that justification of stakeholder is in its normative base; they also raise some sort of disclaimer that Different theories have different purposes and therefore different validity criteria and different implications hints on the breadth of the subject []. • This makes the Instrumental aspect of ST rather interesting, with a practical focus. i.e. how organisations can succeed in current and future business environment.[p72]. Key justification for Instrumental ST at the time was that hypotheses on descriptive theory was untested empirically, leading us to the work of …show more content…
Suppliers, Customers, Financiers, Regulators Secondary Those who influence or are influenced by the firm Media, Various social groups with capacity to mobilise public opinion in either direction. • Adapted RDAP Scale (Reactive Defensive Accommodative Proactive) to include Corporate Posture. A fairly current example is the Volkswagen Scandal where FT (2015 reports . This could be viewed as somewhere between Defencing and accommodative; and would clearly be important as a measure in empirical research. • The three propositions agree with Freeman (2010) Trade off or value creation. (We however need to criticize this somehow so that we don’t chow too much) 7.3 Instrumental Stakeholder Theory: A synthesis of Ethics and Economics • The core theory is that a subset of ethical principles (trust and cooperativeness can result in significant competitive advantage. • Assertively points out to the originality of Donaldson & Preston’s paper
C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2015).Business ethics: Ethical decision making & cases (10th ed.). Mason, OH: Cengage. O 'Sullivan, Arthur; Sheffrin, Steven M. (2003). Economics: Principles in Action. Upper Saddle River, New
Some of the important stakeholders include: internal (executive and senior management, such as CFO, CEO, CNIO, CMIO, CIO, departmental directors), interphase (focus groups representing front line clinicians, pharmacists, nurses, other allied healthcare professionals) and external ( e.g. government regulatory bodies, patients, accreditation associations). As a stakeholder is any individual that can affect or be affected by the CIS deployment, it is important to identify and engaging them early on is critical to the latter success. The interphase stakeholders know best the workflows at the point of care and will help identify a system that is compatible with the needs and has functionality that is in line with the processes. The internal stakeholders
1. Does Zappos effectively focus on stakeholder happiness, and how does this approach affect the ethical culture? At Zappos, Zappos higher goal is to provide happiness. Whether our customers get a new pair of shoes or perfect clothing, as well as in dealing with friendly customer service representatives when the happiness or their employees to become part of the culture.
Legitimacy theory is a “positive theory” that asserts that businesses are bound by the implicit “social contract” that the corporation agrees to perform that are specifically relating to social and environmental issues (Rankin, et al. 2012, 142). To remain congruent with societal values in which it operates, a corporation can address attributes that relate to this theory through voluntary social and environmental disclosures made on platforms like its annual report (Coebergh 2011, 65). Virgin Australia has various groups of important stakeholders who can affect or is affected by both the actions and activities of the corporation (Laasch and Conaway 2014, 97). They are namely, guests, employees, investor groups and shareholders, unions, non-government
A Stakeholder is any individual who has a vested interest in a business and is affected by the organisations decisions and strategies (Pride, Hughes & Kapoor 2015, p. 10). Therefore, the people most affected by Graeter’s decisions to take a long term view of the business rather than aim for short term profits are the family members who have a stake in the business. At the present, Richard Graeter II (CEO), Robert Graeter (vice president of operations) and Chip Graeter (vice president of retail operations) manage the business and are responsible for all the decisions regarding its operations. Graeter’s management team have chosen to forgo the opportunity for short term profits by adhering to the traditional manufacturing process used by Louis
Know Your Business Environment Unit No. 1: The Business Environment Pervez Ghazi Shaikh Date Submitted: 31/10/2016 Carl Loraine Cruz 20154176 Target is the organization that I have chosen for this assignment. Target is a famous discount retailer in United States that was founded by George Dayton. It was formerly called Dayton’s Company in 1910.
Introduction This case study explores the acquisition of the Body Shop, which is one of the largest franchise cosmetics companies in the world, by L’Oreal. The main concentration of the case study aims at investigating the impact on business ethics and corporate social responsibility by the concentricity of the Body Shop and L’Oreal and how the general attitude and buying behaviour is distorted in the course of this acquisition. L‘Oreal being the big conglomerate in the cosmetics industry acquired the Body Shop International which is comparably small but having iconic brand of environmental and socially responsible concerns, on 17 March 2006, through a covenant of $1.2 billion. The combination of two brands in a newly formed conglomerate implies a combination of values, principles and associations that might affect a company’s appeal. The verity that L 'Oreal 's acquisition of the Body Shop provides plenty of potential growth opportunities is undeniable; nevertheless the question of how well the acquisition sits in the group of the world 's largest cosmetics company is another matter.
In a competitive world market, businesses must have a thorough understanding of the processes and systems used within the company in order to determine whose interests need to be taken into account when implementing policies and/or programs. This stakeholder analysis is integral to growth and development. For large corporations which have multiple divisions and companies within their corporate structure it is essential to look at all aspects of the business model to identify stakeholders. Establishing the given responsibilities of the various divisions and the direct role they play in the economic success of the firm must also be considered. Many of the largest and most lucrative corporations in the world are those related to supporting military
It is the firm’s obligation to evaluate in its decision-making processes the effects of its decisions on the external social system in a manner that will accomplish social benefits along with the traditional economic gains, which the firm seeks. It means that social responsibility begins where the law ends. A firm is not being socially responsible if it merely complies with the minimum requirements of the law, because this is what any good citizen would do.” A firm will not survive without the support of both the stakeholders and shareholders, thus the CSR proposes the indication which states that a firm can never exist In a vacuum (Khalidah et. al.).
Stakeholder analysis Stakeholder are entity that will affect the organization actions, objectives and policies. There are two types of stakeholder which is internal stakeholder and external stakeholder. The McDonald’s stakeholders are customers, suppliers, employees, managers, government, local communities and pressure groups. Customers Customers are the external stakeholders of the company, no customer mean zero profit.
Every stake holders has its own needs and demands from the organization. Every stakeholder which are directly attached to the company requires the information as it required and his role. These are the persons, groups or other company which have legitimate interest in the company and its functions. These persons or the group directly or indirectly communicate with the company. Stake holder analysis is done below to understand the needs and demands of the stakeholders.
Davis (as cited by Khalidah, Zulkufly, & Lau, 2014) defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as “… the firm’s consideration of, and response to, issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm. It is the firm’s obligation to evaluate in its decision-making processes the effects of its decisions on the external social system in a manner that will accomplish social benefits along with the traditional economic gains, which the firm seeks. It means that social responsibility begins where the law ends. A firm is not being socially responsible if it merely complies with the minimum requirements of the law, because this is what any good citizen would do.” A firm will not survive without the support of both the stakeholders and shareholders, thus the CSR proposes the indication which stats that a firm can never exist In a vacuum (Khalidah et.
The History of Business Ethics and Stakeholder Theory in America Ethics play a huge role in the global business field, since considerations have to be made on moral practices, values, and judgments that govern the direction and overall success of the company. Consequently, over the progression of history, managers, entrepreneurs, and stakeholders at the helm of organizations have always had the mandate of making moral resolves on matters of ethics. According to Hunter (2003), such an approach to ethical behavior prompts a substantial growth in the organizational corporation, as well as maximizing business profits, and creating a reputable company image (Cutler, 2004). Notably, the overall performances of organizations that take part in unethical
3. Stakeholders: Definition:A person, group or organisation that has interest or concern in an organisation. Stakeholders can affect or be affected by the organisation 's actions, objectives and policies. Some examples of key stakeholders are creditors, directors, employees, government (and its agencies), owners (shareholders), suppliers, unions, and the community from which the business draws its resources. Not all stakeholders are equal.
Here you look on the difference between benefits and harms for the society and if the benefits are greater than the decision or an action is considered as ethical, if lower – unethical. Here it is important to identify the stakeholders and an effects on them from actions or decisions of a company. “You can think of a stakeholder as a person or organization that can affect or be affected by your organization. Stakeholders can come from inside or outside of the organization. Examples of stakeholders of a business include customers, employees, stockholders, suppliers, non-profit community organizations, government, and the local community among many others.”