Schools in America take a test each year called the standardized test, which is a tool used to measure the effectiveness of the school, the teacher, and the performance of the student. However, “standardized tests have been a part of American education since the mid- 1800s. Their use sky rocketed after 2002’s No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) mandated annual testing in all 50 states” (Standardized Tests - ProCon.org.). In addition, for years teachers have been on a schedule to cram their students with information that is a majority of the time only relevant to what is on the standardized test. Teachers push this information onto their students because the Standardized test scores are really important to the school, and it makes the school appear …show more content…
Phelps” (Standardized Tests - ProCon.org.). Furthermore “debates about standardized testing are wide-ranging, nuanced, and sometimes emotionally charged, many debates tend to be focused on the ways in which the tests are used, and whether they present reliable or unreliable evaluations of student learning, rather than on whether standardized testing is inherently good or bad” (Standardized Test Definition). In addition, “proponents say standardized tests are a fair and objective measure of student achievement, that they ensure teachers and schools are accountable to taxpayers, and that the most relevant constituents- parents and students- approve of testing” (Standardized Tests - ProCon.org.). However “most test developers and testing experts for example, caution against using standardized-test scores as an exclusive measure of educational performance, although many would also contend that test scores can be a valuable indicator of performance if used appropriately and judiciously” (Standardized Test Definition). A local teacher said “some principles like standardized test because they can make they’re school look good which equals more money. Most teachers don’t like standardized tests because it makes them have to teach to the test instead of teaching the curriculum. It also puts a lot of pressure on the teachers because in some states they’re tests scores decide on how much they get paid, if they get to say in that grade level, or if they get moved to a different grade level because their scores were better for that grade level” (source 1). A teacher that teaches at a local school said “the state testing I had used for much of my career was severely flawed (STAR) I did
Some may argue that standardized tests are an accurate measure of one's academic level, a good way to see if they are being taught what they need to be taught, and if they are smart enough to get into a college or school. Standardized tests have existed for a very long time, even ancient Greece used similar tests.. A researcher from law.journal.ku.edu states, “This testing began in 1901 after the creation of the College Entrance Examination Board”(Naughton 264). So, standardized tests are not a new concept and they continue to exist. Some may believe that standardized tests are a way to test how well a teacher is at teaching.
Proponents see standardized testing as a way of making testing more efficient and effective by minimizing cost and increasing people’s accountability for their performance in the system. Opponents on the other hand argue that the systems has limitations based on its very nature on what can be tested and as a result of these standards needing to be met sacrifice some very important aspects of students education experience as well as force onto students and teachers a one size fits all model that has failed to deliver on its promises. After having reviewed all the evidence in detail it becomes clear to me that standardized testing is not an effective system for educating students and does more bad than good
Even though many students absolutely hate them, state assessments are a big part of the American education system. Everyone has taken a standardized test at some point in their life, and almost everyone has done poorly on one. They are primarily used as a measurement of how well students learn, but are they truly accurate? There are strong arguments on both sides, which has started a heated conflict about the productiveness of these tests. Standardized testing has been around for many years, starting in Imperial China where it was intended to determine a person’s aptitude for a government position (“Do Standardized Tests Show an Accurate View of Students’ Abilities?”).
Standardized testing really took off after the no child left behind act of 2001. Since then the number of standardized tests has only gone up. Now even 2nd graders have to take standardized tests. More tests is the answer our government has for the problems with our education. Tests are not the solution, they are part of the problem.
Standardized testing has not improved education in America. Standardized tests have been issued in schools all across the nation for years now. Some people like them and some people don’t. They do not help the student learn more information than they would without the tests. The U.S. has dropped from 18th highest scores in schools in the world to be in the 30’s on almost all of the subjects on the test.
Teach. Test. Repeat. This is the simplified modification of teaching being done in a high school now-a-days. “We are going to take a pop-quiz,” are words that most probably will not be spoken in a real-life job after college is over.
Standardized testing is becoming a concern for many. There are many pro and cons associated with standardized testing and students. In our present education system, standardized testing is view as a way to find out the progress the student has or is academically. However, this may not always be the case. Standardized testing is actually putting a lot of pressure on students, families, teacher, and the school system.
Standardized Testing hurts children who think in different ways. This is quoted by Valerie Strauss, who makes a great point by saying children can only learn by the way it 's taught and it cannot be learned from other sources. Standardized Testing limits what children can learn and how they learn. Schools also spend an extraordinary amount on testing that could be going to better education and more funding to arts and extracurricular activities. Although, some say standardized testing is beneficial to the way students learn, statistics show that this is simply not true, standardized testing adds unnecessary stress on students, suppresses their creativity, and limits the creativity of teachers.
Standardized tests should not be present in schools because of the obstructive effects on students individually, the lack of helpful information and testing curriculum to further improve test scores, and the disruption of knowledge taught in the classroom. Standardized tests affect students in many ways. They can be influenced by many factors like hunger, stress, tiredness, pressure, and even stereotypical threats. Distractions and influential factors such as the ones listed can harm a student individually, causing the testing environment to be unfair and responsible for missed questions.
When a teacher announces that there is an upcoming test, sighs and complaining will fill the room. But are standardized tests all that bad? Standardized tests are a simple and fast way to evaluate whether students understand what is required of them to learn. Many people have started to protest standardized testing because of the effect it has on students. Standardized tests should continue because they help teachers improve their teaching, allow students’ progress to be tracked over time, and they hold schools accountable for student’s learning.
Introduction Standardized tests may be used for a wide variety of educational purposes. For example, they may be used to determine a young child’s readiness for kindergarten, identify students who need special-education services or specialized academic support, place students in different academic programs or course levels, or award diplomas and other educational certificates. Thesis Statement Standardized tests should not be eliminated completely, but should rather be evaluated in addition to other factors such as grades, extracurricular activities, and volunteer hours. This would take pressure off of students during standardized tests, allow colleges to see how well-rounded the students are, and give students who are better in other areas
The teach to test method is when teachers base the education and lessons of their classes to prepare them for a test. Going off of the Noah Webster Education Foundation, “The need to meet specific testing standards pressures teachers to ‘teach to the test’ rather than providing a broad curriculum” (“Part Two”). Rather than teachers instructing lessons that will educate students on topics and material that will help them in the future and help them grow as people, teachers are pressured to teach students solely material that will be on a future test; this material may be forgotten or be completely irrelevant once the exam is over. Standardized tests do not seem to prepare students for the future, they appear to do quite the opposite, in
Students are typically against standardized testing. They believe it causes too much stress and is too “high stakes”. This group also includes many teachers who are tired of “teaching to the test”. The teachers have seen important programs cut in order to spend more time preparing for the tests. There is a compromise position that a growing number of people started to support.
As a student in high school did you ever feel like the standardized test are helping you or making you get in to a better college? Have you ever thought about how many hours students and teachers spend preparing for the standardized test? Many hours and studying are being put into those test but are they really effective and are the test doing the students good in life? Standardized tests are really just to effective, teachers and students spend too much time on them and it’s not doing the students any good, and even it’s not doing the teachers any good. Standardized tests in schools today in Ohio should be stopped because they are causing for teachers to be evaluated by the test results of how the students do on the tests, they are having the students more stressed about school and do they benefit you in colleges and university and do they really look at how well students do on them test.
The test is an effective way to not only evaluates students’ objective skills in reading, writing and math skills, but also helps students to become more globally competitive (Walberg). Those against the use of standardized testing argue that the test do not truly teaches students, but creates problem solving tricks and artificial ways of thinking. They also argue the test is biased, they point out the correlation between test scores and external factors such as family income, location, and race. On the other hand, supporters say testing is both a genuine tool for knowledge and an objective way to measure academic performance, thus needed to be reinforced more (Walberg). The controversy over standardized testing creates an incentive for every students, parents, and educators to be involved.