What Are The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Testing

A standardized test, according to W. James Popham of ASCD.org, is “any examination that is administered and scored in a predetermined, standard manner.” In standardized testing, examinees are instructed to precisely answer a specific set of questions, which are usually multiple-choices. Although standardized testing is believed to be an objective method to grade students, administers should understand that these tests are not only a waste of time, but also a waste of money. Standardized testing is irrelevant to a student’s education because it is an unreliable way to measure a student’s knowledge, causes stress, and hinders a student’s overall learning potential.

Another bad example of the aftermath of standardized testing is cramming, which some might do as a result of the lack of concern with studies. “I can no longer cooperate with a testing regime that I believe is suffocating creativity and innovation in the classroom. We are not really educating our students anymore. We are merely teaching them to pass a test. This is wrong.

Students are stressed out about passing rather than learning. Learning a subject should be something that we should remember because of how interesting we found the topic or lesson. With all these test thrown our way we focus on memorizing rather than understanding which leads us to forgetting what we memorized after the test. Texas school 's only care about passing grades, good

The author gives an understanding as to why these thoughts were vital works of ethical rehearses, and why inappropriate custom of standardized test outcomes would no longer exist, or at least be evaded. He shades some light on the practice of standardized tests as an individual portion of a scholar’s theoretical growth and enactment is challenging at its’ highest and unethical at

On one hand, it is easy to see the potential ineffectiveness of the tests: some students may not take the assessments seriously, the curriculum taught by the educator can affect the level of preparedness, etc., and therefore the argument can be made that even if critical thinking skills are measured, the data gathered from the tests may not be accurate. However, the establishment of standards and a universal approach for educating allows for a tentative guideline by which one can measure the progress of the nation’s students from year to year and find common trends. Both Advanced Placement tests and the Keystone assessments, though drastically different in format, allowed me to test my knowledge in several subjects and learn where I ranked among my peers. Whether fill-in-the-bubble or multiple choice questions commonly found on standardized tests cause students to “analyze, evaluate, interpret, or synthesize information and apply creative thought to form an argument, solve a problem, or reach a conclusion,” is ultimately debatable.

Standardized testing has become a very controversial topic amongst the nation. There are two sides, one that agrees that these tests are doing well for students and school officials, and another that argues that these tests are hurting the students taking them and should be put to a stop. Norman R. Augustine wrote an article for the need of standardized testing, and Jessie B. Ramey States the ways that the tests are impairing the learning capability of the students. Norman uses three arguments that people opposing the standardized test would most often use.

In concluding teachers, Becker predicts student success on academic achievement instead of motivation, which could stop a student from achieving goals. Although many students have motivation which can lead to academic achievement, but when lower grade students receive discouragement to succeed in academics because their grades are low is a false

On the other hand, the opponents of this idea believe that standardized test is inadequate as an educational evaluation tool. They maintain that the multiple-choice format that is used on standardized testing is seen as an insufficient tool for assessment, and instead, encourages a simplistic way of thinking, where there are only correct and wrong answers that do not seem to be applicable in real-world situations. Also, such a format is biased towards male students, who are found to adapt more easily to the game-like point scoring of multiple-choice questions. They put forward this argument also because they assert that standardized testing can be wrongfully used as a center of debate to fuel political agendas. This is a sad reality far too often

Liz Mandrell and Jerry Farber decide to put the grading system controversy up for debate. Mandrell portrays her argument in “Zen and the Art of Grade Motivation,” and Farber makes his case in “A Young Person’s Guide to the Grading System.” Both use their arguments to depict whether or not grades are needed in

Imagine a classroom where students a caned for getting grades lower than a certain mark and after the exams are caned for falling below the pass mark. It is important to realize that this kind of environment would create fear within the children. Consequently, in this kind of environment where one is punished for not doing well in his or her academics, the student would not be comfortable in making mistakes which are all part of the process of learning. The studies done by Arif and Rafi similarly backs this up. In their research it can be concluded that the pupils who experience corporal punishment do not actually get better, but do worse than those who do not experience it

High-stake standardized testing is a controversial topic. Teachers and students either adapt well to the testing or struggle to find the good that comes from it. High-stake testing is in effect to determine where students stand. It shows the state if the teachers are ready to teach and if the studnets have tetained the information taught. High-stake testing is suppose to help teachers and students become well equipped in the future.

standardized testing is a very common way of determining a student 's past academic achievement and future potential. however, high-stakes tests can cause anxiety. when teachers or schools are rewarded for better performance on tests, then those rewards encourage teachers to "teach to the test" instead of providing a rich and broad curriculum. as a result, standardized testing has become controversial in the united states.

How well do standardized tests actually measure your abilities? Some people support standardized tests, but others are against them. I believe standardized tests are irrelevant because students start to believe they’re stupid, the tests don't improve education overall, and they are used too much to judge how well the students are being taught and learning. The first reason for my belief is that some people start to believe that they are stupid or dumb due to standardized test scores.

Standardized testing is not allowing kids to be their own person. Instead, they are stressed and confused. Standardized test are only effective when the students do well. But when students are not prepared for the test and do bad, the school suffers. The point of a standardized test is to show the growth of a student.

The role standardized testing plays in our national education system has been steadily increasing in the past couple of decades and is a point of strong criticism in our society today. Since the passing of No Child Left Behind in 2002, standardized tests are the most valued tool employed by the federal government to evaluate student achievement and school effectiveness. In three separate articles “Standardized Testing Has Negatively Impacted Public Schools,” by Bobbie Solley, “Study Shows Standardized Testing Is Overwhelming Nation’s Public Schools,” by Lyndsey Layton, and “Disappearing Act: End The Testing Fixation Before It Erases More Meaningful Education,” by Virginia Myers, the authors stress that standardized testing does not reflect