Stanford Prison Experiment Philip G Zimbardo
Obedience and individuality must have a balance in order for a society to function alls well. According to head researcher and acting warden, Philip G. Zimbardo, the main purpose of The Stanford Prison Experiment would be to study and to understand the roles people develop in prison. In order to discover the roles that humans take in prison environments, Zimbardo would convert the basement of Stanford University into a mock prison. Twenty-four healthy male college students would participate in this experiment; however, half would be acting as prisoners and the latter as guards. This experiment would go on for two weeks to fully analyze the ending result of the mock environment. The end goal was to learn about the process by which each person learns to become compliant or authoritarian. Although, one could argue that in the end, it was unethical to carry out this study …show more content…
The first example of cruelty expressed by the guards formed quickly after each party was dehumanized. Slowly a symbiotic relationship formed whereas guards became more aggressive, the prisoners would become more obedient. Throughout the experiment, guards would make comments such as, “ I wanted to go back in the cell and have a go with him, since he attacked me when I wasn’t ready;” or “ but we were always there to show them who was boss.” This relationship resulted in three prisoners having to be let go because of extreme depression and other fits of rage, within the first few days. And as Zimbardo had discussed the study, he made the analysis that, “ from the first to the last day, there was a significant increase in the guards’ use of most of these domineering, abusive tactics.” The fact that Zimbardo could clearly see that discovery, and still continue this experiment is extraordinary. This experiment has blatantly expressed itself that it is unethical in its torturous
Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
1007 Words | 5 PagesThere was so much that happened here that was so, so wrong, all because of power. In this paper, I will be explaining why this experiment could not, and should not, be conducted today. The first major point in the ethical rules of experimentation
Kyle Patrick Alvarez's 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'
749 Words | 3 PagesIn Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s The Stanford Prison Experiment, 20 college aged boys are selected to play different roles in a simulated prison located within Stanford. This experiment was thought of and carried out by Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology. The boys, who were also students at Stanford, were randomly selected to be a guard or a prisoner. The prisoners were taken by real police officers to the Stanford jail. When the experiment started, most of the prisoners thought of the situation as it was intended to be, an experiment.
Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Dr. Philip Zimbardo
723 Words | 3 PagesThe guards and soldiers got so carried away with their position of power that they lost sight of what their job really were. The students involved in the experiment started behaving in the same way because they thought that they were really in prison and that they were not informed that it was still an experiment. The isolation caused the groups to develop an us against the world mentality which led them to believe that no one would understand what they were going through except for the other members of the communities. A while after the experiment, a prisoner was asked about his experience during the experiment and was asked to discuss on his time in solitary confinement. He talks about how he lost his identity and how he became just another prisoner at the time.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment Affects The African American Culture
1613 Words | 7 PagesForty years prior to the experiment, the story became nationwide. Although deception is often used throughout many experiments, the researchers are obligated to let the participants know. The researcher failed to follow the ethnical guideline in debriefing. In the second phase of the experiment 200 men, the controlled group, were added to the study. The researcher also failed to inform these men on the basis of the study.
Philip Zimbardo's The Stanford Prison Experiment
1572 Words | 7 PagesEven though there are people willing to risk it all to go back to the life they had, there are some that become submissive and stop fighting. In Stanford Prison Experiment conducted by Stanford phycology department. They recruited college students to run a mock prison so they could study the effect of becoming a prisoner and a prison guard. In this experiment that was supposed to run for two weeks ended up being stopped by the researchers on the six day because it was getting out of control. This is stated by the heads of the experiment Philip Zimbardo, Craig Haney, W. Curtis Banks, and David Jaffe in their report of the experiment.
Stanford Prison Experiment Essay
690 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment portrayed that a prison environment conflicted personalities and roles of an individual to act out of character. From an inmate’s perspective in the American prison system they were powerless. From a guard’s perspective it was the need to instill fear to obtain order in such a hostile environment over dangerous criminals. Considering the fact that the expected two week long experiment only lasted a week, suggests that conditions were more harsh than expected. Dr. Zimbardo challenged ethical principles of psychology dealing with human relations, and resolving ethical issues within a prison environment.
Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo
751 Words | 4 PagesIn summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves
Compare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
810 Words | 4 PagesThis experiment was conducted in Stanford University by Dr. Zimbardo. During this two week long session, Dr. Zimbardo had several volunteers agree to act as prisoners and as prison guards. The prisoners were told to wait in their houses while the guards were to set up the mock prison, a tactic used by Dr. Zimbardo to make them fit into their roles more. The official police apprehended the students assigned to the role of prisoner from their homes, took mug shots, fingerprinted them, and gave them dirty prison uniforms. The guards were given clean guard uniforms, sunglasses, and billy clubs borrowed from the police.
Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment
599 Words | 3 PagesStanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo questioned, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?” (Zimbardo, 1971) In 1971 a psychologist named Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment on the effects prison has on young males with the help of his colleague Stanley Milgram. They wanted to find out if the reports of brutality from guards was due to the way guards treated prisoners or the prison environment.
Philip Zimbardo's Prison Experiment
611 Words | 3 PagesSome guards are more forceful than others and place prisoners in the Hole or revoke privileges to demand attention and respect. Some prisoners started to protest these demeaning actions that were unnecessary from the guards. Guards retaliated with their various forms of indirect of abuse. This was when the first signs of distress occurred among the prisoners. The prisoners started to barricade themselves in their cells as a way to protest against the guards and in response, a guard blew a fire extinguisher onto the inmates of Cell 2 (Zimbardo, 2007).
How Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesHowever, the ethical decisions they made during the experiment were directly related to the roles they were assigned – the guards believed it was ‘right’ to punish and humiliate the prisoners because the prisoners were ‘bad’. As for the ethics of the experiment, Zimbardo said he believed the experiment was ethical before it began but unethical in hindsight because he and the others involved had no idea the experiment would spiral to the point of abuse that it did. The Stanford Prison Experiment reveals the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior.
Study Of Stanford County Jail By Philip Zimbardo
1092 Words | 5 PagesDuring the fall of 1973, Phillip Zimbardo conducted his famous Stanford Prison Study where he recruited 24 undergraduate students to either become prisoners or guards in his experimental prison: the “Stanford County Jail". The recreation of this prison was conducted to study how an individual’s status and/or label changed depending on the social role they had to fulfill. The participants included 12 guards and 12 prisoners, each given proper uniform to wear, such as providing the prisoners with a smock that contained ID numbers on both sides and a chain with a heavy ball around their ankle. Both groups were also given detailed instructions on the requirements they had to complete in order for the individual to assimilate to their character.
Summary Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Saul Mcleod
213 Words | 1 PagesIn the article “The Stanford Prison Experiment” by Saul Mcleod it takes the reader through the process of an experiment by the University of Stanford were they got a group of people and split them up into to groups one group of people were guards and the other group of people were the prisoners, now in the experiment the guards were in charge of the prisoners, the prisoners relied on the guards for everything whether it be food or water or even a new set of clothes but as the experiment went on the guard abused their power making prisoners do miniscule task such as clean toilets with toothbrushes re make their beds after they had just been made and other thing, is is an example of the guards having to much power and they abused it at their
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesThe experiment was executed well. Yet, there are unethical practices happened during the experiment. First, the participants were not fully informed about the experiment. The researchers did not explain to the participants the processes in conducting the experiment. The participants were not informed that they would be arrested by cops in their homes.
Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review
1129 Words | 5 PagesUnit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.
More about Stanford Prison Experiment Philip G Zimbardo
Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment
1007 Words | 5 PagesKyle Patrick Alvarez's 'The Stanford Prison Experiment'
749 Words | 3 PagesOf The Stanford Prison Experiment By Dr. Philip Zimbardo
723 Words | 3 PagesThe Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment Affects The African American Culture
1613 Words | 7 PagesPhilip Zimbardo's The Stanford Prison Experiment
1572 Words | 7 PagesStanford Prison Experiment Essay
690 Words | 3 PagesCompare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo
751 Words | 4 PagesCompare And Contrast The Milgram Experiment And The Stanford Prison Experiment
810 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Stanford Prison Experiment
599 Words | 3 PagesPhilip Zimbardo's Prison Experiment
611 Words | 3 PagesHow Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesStudy Of Stanford County Jail By Philip Zimbardo
1092 Words | 5 PagesSummary Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Saul Mcleod
213 Words | 1 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesStanford Prison Experiment Literature Review
1129 Words | 5 Pages