Stanford Prison Study Pros And Cons
DISCUSSION FORUM
UNIT 3
ENGL 1102
The recent years have witnessed an increasing public concern regarding the potential harm caused by some of the prominent research studies, such as the Stanford Prison study and the Immunization study. Both these studies have sparked public criticism, owing to the potential harm they caused in the process. In this assignment, we will look into the possible harms caused by these studies and some potential solutions that could have been implemented by the scientists, media and the public to either avoid or repair the damage.
The Stanford Prison Study “one of the most notorious experiments in the study of human psychology” ( Leithead. A, 2011). Created a prison-like environment and randomly assigned students to the role of guards and prisoners, as part of a simulated prison experience. The participants reported long-lasting psychological distress following the experiment and the controversy of ethical issues and violations resulted in the premature termination of the experiment.
Similarly, the Immunization Study
…show more content…
For the Stanford Prison Study, it would have been ideal if stricter rules and guidelines were in place that clearly mentioned the roles of participants in such experiments, including appropriate behavior guidelines. This could have ensured that such experiments don’t go beyond their intended boundaries and that the rights of the participants are well respected. For the Immunization Study, stringent rules should have been in place that require more detailed assessment of the potential risks associated with such experiments, prior to the actual conduct of such research. Furthermore, proper medical attention and facilities should have been provided to the exposed population to ensure their
Outlook At Chapter 14 In Bad Blood Tuskegee
1003 Words | 5 PagesThere are now laws that require every study to be examined and approved by committees before any experiment involve humans is
Henrietta Lack
1937 Words | 8 PagesThe job of the “Commission was to identify the basic ethical principles that should underlie the conduct of biomedical and behavioral research involving human subjects and to develop guidelines which should be followed to assure that such research is conducted in accordance with those principles.” (The National Commission for the Protection of Human
Effects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
689 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most infamous and controversial psychological experiments to ever take place to this day. In 1971, Phillip Zimbardo created an experiment that tested the changes one endures when they have to adapt in a prison environment and provided an explanation for the dehumanizing effects of the penile system. 24, college-aged, men were chosen to participate in the 2 week long experiment by flipping a coin to decide whether they’re given the role of prisoner or guard. After their roles were determined, they were given uniforms, cells, identification numbers, etc. Little did he know that the results of this experiment would give some of the most ethically challenged results of time.
The Stanford Jail Experiment Summary
989 Words | 4 PagesThe Stanford jail experiment, which was carried out in 1971 by Phillip Zimbardo, was designed to examine the function of power in a prison environment. In a mock jail setting, subjects were randomly assigned to the roles of "prisoners" and "guards." The experiment was intended to run for two weeks but was discontinued after six days. In the Stanford experiment, a few ethical principles were not adhered to.
The Underused Hpv Vaccine Rhetorical Analysis
989 Words | 4 PagesOne of the previously mentioned arguments for anti-vaccers was the argument that the vaccine would cause teenagers to act more immorally. This is proven to be false when Dr. Saslow, the lead author of the cancer society’s, updated guidelines and firmly states that there is “no direct connection between the vaccine and sexual activity and no reason to suggest one.” Brody’s mention of the famous doctor effectively persuades the reader to see the truth behind the research. The mention of parents being concerned about the effects these vaccines is considered a rhetorical cannon of relationship. The supposed relationship between the vaccine and physical consequences encountered after being vaccinated is a the main elements behind the anti-vaccers argument.
The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
1572 Words | 7 PagesIt was one of the longest study that had the backing of the United States Public Health Services (USPHS). In conclusion, even though the article talks about the group of males’ participations at free will, the experiment on African- American males was one of the cruelest that lacked diversity and was full of coercion and violated many APA ethical principles as well as simply impeded on the rights of human beings by withholding the available treatment to
Compare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo
751 Words | 4 PagesIn summary, the purpose of the Stanford Prison Experiment was supposed to demonstrate that powerful situational forces, much like Abu Ghraib, could over-ride individual dispositions and choices, leading good people to do bad things simply because of the role they found themselves
Essay On Stanford Prison Experiment
599 Words | 3 PagesStanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo questioned, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?” (Zimbardo, 1971) In 1971 a psychologist named Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment on the effects prison has on young males with the help of his colleague Stanley Milgram. They wanted to find out if the reports of brutality from guards was due to the way guards treated prisoners or the prison environment.
Medical Experiments: The Most Horrifying Aspects Of The Holocaust
1191 Words | 5 Pages*The Holocaust remains one of the most devastating events in human history. It claimed the lives of millions of people, including Jewish people, those a part of the LGBTQ+ community, disabled people, and many others (Blackmore, 2019). One of the most horrifying aspects of the Holocaust was the medical experimentations which were conducted on the prisoners within the Nazi-controled concentration camps. These experiments were cruel, inhumane, and conducted without the consent of the victims, leading me to believe that the research gathered should be completely disregarded.
How Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesHowever, the ethical decisions they made during the experiment were directly related to the roles they were assigned – the guards believed it was ‘right’ to punish and humiliate the prisoners because the prisoners were ‘bad’. As for the ethics of the experiment, Zimbardo said he believed the experiment was ethical before it began but unethical in hindsight because he and the others involved had no idea the experiment would spiral to the point of abuse that it did. The Stanford Prison Experiment reveals the powerful role that the situation can play in human behavior.
Henrietta Lacks And Ethics
462 Words | 2 PagesIn order to research the theory of cancerous cells being infectious, two scientists traveled to an Ohio maximum security prison to conduct several experiments on prisoners. This testing involved taking the HeLa cells, and injecting the prisoners, to observe possible reactions. Despite the fact that the prisoners were informed of the risks, this experimentation was conducted intentionally to cause disease in another human being. This theory, however, was disproved as an infectious cancer because none of the test subjects developed full blown cancer.
The Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesStanford Experiment: Unethical or Not Stanford Prison Experiment is a popular experiment among social science researchers. In 1973, a psychologist named Dr. Philip Zimbardo wants to find out what are the factors that cause reported brutalities among guards in American prisons. His aim was to know whether those reported brutalities were because of the personalities of the guards or the prison environment. However, during the experiment, things get muddled unexpectedly. The experiment became controversial since it violates some ethical standards while doing the research.
Stanford Prison Experiment Literature Review
1129 Words | 5 PagesUnit 1 Written Assignment Literature Review of article on Standard Prison Experiment Introduction This article concerns the Stanford Prison experiment carried out in 1971 at Stanford University. The experiment commenced on August 14, and was stopped after only six days. It is one of the most noted psychological experiments on authority versus subordinates. The studies which emerged from this have been of interest to those in prison and military fields due to its focus on the psychology associated with authority.
The Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1787 Words | 8 PagesA decrease in animal testing will not only help animals, but it will help science. Although some say that scientific experimentation is not a cruel endeavor (using reasons such as proper handling, maintaining the health of the animal, and the replication of the animals’ natural environments being taught to students in order to preserve uncontaminated results), animals still die by the millions unnecessarily each year (“Ratting” 2). Ending all animal testing immediately is highly irrational and improbable. There is already a gradual decrease in animal experimentation, but humanity has to decrease animal testing at a higher rate, removing all unnecessary forms of experimentation by using alternatives, and eventually,
Essay On Animal Testing
896 Words | 4 PagesTheory laden observation highlights that anything observed by humans is shaped and interpreted by their past encounters or culture around them (Scudder, 1997). In this case, the past experiences of scientists who approve of animal testing can be examined. According to researcher J. David Jentsch, animal testing has greatly improved the world of science. He declares that animal testing has allowed him to understand the mechanisms of humans even more, because “There's no hope for developing medicines or interventions or treatments for the brain and for psychological functioning until you first understand how the brain works.” (Collier, 2014).
More about Stanford Prison Study Pros And Cons
Outlook At Chapter 14 In Bad Blood Tuskegee
1003 Words | 5 PagesHenrietta Lack
1937 Words | 8 PagesEffects Of The Stanford Prison Experiment By Philip Zimbardo
689 Words | 3 PagesThe Stanford Jail Experiment Summary
989 Words | 4 PagesThe Underused Hpv Vaccine Rhetorical Analysis
989 Words | 4 PagesThe Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment
1572 Words | 7 PagesCompare And Contrast Stanford Prison Experiment And Philip Zimbardo
751 Words | 4 PagesEssay On Stanford Prison Experiment
599 Words | 3 PagesMedical Experiments: The Most Horrifying Aspects Of The Holocaust
1191 Words | 5 PagesHow Did Philip Zimbardo Conform
1676 Words | 7 PagesHenrietta Lacks And Ethics
462 Words | 2 PagesThe Stanford Prison Experiment: Unethical Or Not
746 Words | 3 PagesStanford Prison Experiment Literature Review
1129 Words | 5 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Animal Testing
1787 Words | 8 PagesEssay On Animal Testing
896 Words | 4 Pages