Opening Statement State v. Trepalt May it please the court, counsel, and members of the jury. In sickness and in health, until death do us part, is not an invitation to commit murder. On Thanksgiving Weekend, after a party, the Trepalt’s were driving home. It was early in the morning, still dark, when Mr. Trepalt took a corner too fast and lost control of his car. There was an accident. Mr. Trepalt walked away with no injuries, but his wife, Violet, would never be the same again. The accident resulted in her being paralyzed from the waist down, having problems with her fine motor skills, and needing care around the clock. Violet Trepalt, who had once been an independent and active woman, would now spend the majority of the the rest of her life in bed. Today, the state will show that following the accident, Mr. Trepalt began to view his wife, who he had sworn to love in sickness and in health, as burden, as a barrier, and later, as a bounty. As I have already mentioned, following the accident Mrs. Trepalt was in constant need of care. But testimony you will hear today will show, that Mr. Trepalt simply couldn’t be burdened with becoming involved in the care of his wife. Instead he relied on the nurses, the hired help, to care for his wife. In fact, Mr. Trepalt was so uninvolved with her care, that you will hear Nurse …show more content…
Trepalt. He met Nurse Quinby, who he hired as nurse to care for his wife. But care for Violet was not the only thing that Nurse Quinby did, she also became a companion to Mr. Trepalt, and evidence will show that a romance between the two was formed. Miss Flanders will testify that on several occasions Mrs. Trepalt would drive Nurse Quinby home. On once such occasion, he even spent the night. But the romance between the two couldn’t progress, after all, Mr. Trepalt was still married. Violet, in her weakened condition, was now forming a barrier between Mr. Trepalt and his new
Fink’s Rhetorical Strategies: Facilitating the Consideration of Several Perspectives In Five Days at Memorial, Sheri Fink strikes a convincing balance between persuasion and objectivity. The events that took place during Hurricane Katrina continue to be scrutinized, and this book investigates the potentially unethical decisions made by people in authority. Doctors and nurses were forced to work long hours while suffering from severe emotional trauma, a fact that Fink does not discount in her assessment of their decision-making processes.
One of the most significant current discussions in legal and moral philosophy is whether a person who has no will to live can be allowed to die by the doctors, who know that the enormous cost of time, expense and professional effort spent on them is a waste. Similarly, in this essay, Living Will, by Danielle Ofri, the author describes her own dilemma as to whether she should be allowing patients who have no will to live to die or she should try to motivate them to live. Although it is true that, many of the patients may appear to be having no will to live at all, the author describes how deep inside they may actually be having a hope and willingness to continue to live. This paper will focus on the term ‘living will’, which is a term which can be interpreted in different ways. In fact, there are two meanings to the title of this essay ‘Living Will’, first of which means the will to live more based on hope and the second is the will written during the lifetime wanting not to live anymore due to lack of any motivation due to many diseases.
In Flannery O'Connor's “The Life You Save May Be Your Own” It begins with a woman named Mrs.Crater along with her thirty year old deaf daughter Lucynell. The two women watch as a man named Tom Shiftlet approaches their porch and comments on the sunset. At first, the old woman doesn’t like him and speaks of the man harshly calling him a “tramp” due to him having one arm. Tom notices the women have a car as a result comments on it. Mrs Crater tells Tom that the car hasn't run in over fifteen years as to when her husband passed away.
Case study of Mrs. A thought her admission to a acute ward, demonstrated the skills that are needed to care for her. 21312829 This assignment is a case study looking at a patient who has been admitted to an acute hospital following a fall. It will look at why the patient has been admitted and what skills are needed to deliver appropriate care.
Partisanship and Misconceptions Introduction The saying “the pen is mightier than the sword” is widely known and referenced. However, contrary to popular belief, actions may speak louder than words. This rings true in the case of Michelle Carter, this specific case has been a reoccurring debate, in terms of whether Michelle Carter should be found guilty or not guilty for the death of her boyfriend, Conrad Roy III.
Routine A disturbance in a Tuesday morning routine was a change of a lifetime: my brief car-ride nap was interrupted by a crash, then, the jarring of the ambulance. It was an unexpected awakening. Sixth grade social studies and spelling tests had to be put aside, as the rest of my day would be filled with the beeps of machines and chatter of scrub-clad trauma nurses. Suddenly, my mind was back in my body - and my first conscious words were my complaints of the uncomfortable neck brace, followed by my request to remove it.
The topic that I have chosen last week was “Hastening Death” and I presented an insight of both the pros and cons to the controversy. However, this week’s critical thinking analysis, I am choosing the pros of Hastening Death because of many reasons that are forth the positions. First of all, making decision is something that one should definitely make on their own because at the end of the day, your decision is going to matter the most. Even, if there are people who are going to disagree with what you decide on, it depends on what you want at the end. So, having the options to hasten your own death should be available.
The Death with Dignity Act has two arguments: those who believe we have the right to choose how and when we die, and those who believe we do not possess that right; that we should not interfere with the natural order of life. Every year, people across America are diagnosed with a terminal illness. For some people there is time: time to hope for a cure, time to fight the disease, time to pray for a miracle. For others however, there is very little or no time. For these patients, their death is rapidly approaching and for the vast majority of them, it will be a slow and agonizing experience.
The documentary, A Death of One’s Own, explores the end of life complexities that many terminal disease patients have to undergo in deciding on dying and dignity. It features three patients, their families, and caregivers debating the issue of physician-assisted suicide or pain relief than may speed up death. One character, Jim Witcher has ALS and knows the kind of death he is facing and wants to control its timing. Kitty Rayl is suffering from terminal cancer and wants to take advantage of her state’s Death with Dignity Act and take medication to terminate her life. Ricky Tackett, on the other hand, has liver failure and together with his family and caregiver agrees on terminal sedation to relieve his delirium and pain.
Throughout human history, humans have been known to execute gruesome acts. Whether these acts are small and insignificant or massive and change history, humans are capable of performing horrific plots against one another. To make matters worse, most of the people who commit these terrible crimes are people who are entirely in a clear state of mind. Nevertheless, there are some cases in which the line between sanity and mental instability blurs. For example, there is an ongoing debate regarding the mental health of the main character in William Faulkner’s story “A Rose for Emily.”
Relevant legal and ethical considerations, focusing on the 4 main ethical principles and how each of these apply to this case using research evidence. Focusing on the ethical theory of Beauchamp and Childress, it is considered one of the most fundamental elements for beginning a discussion in the Not for resuscitation (NFR) debate. (Fornari, 2015). The four main ethical principles, autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence and justice hold the grounding block for issues of this nature. End of life care is an imperative characteristic of acute stroke nursing, as stroke mortality rates remain high, regardless of enhancements in the health care industry.
Assisted suicide is a rather controversial issue in contemporary society. When a terminally ill patient formally requests to be euthanized by a board certified physician, an ethical dilemma arises. Can someone ethically end the life of another human being, even if the patient will die in less than six months? Unlike traditional suicide, euthanasia included multiple individuals including the patient, doctor, and witnesses, where each party involved has a set of legal responsibilities. In order to understand this quandary and eventually reach a conclusion, each party involved must have their responsibilities analyzed and the underlying guidelines of moral ethics must be investigated.
“Death with dignity is a human right: to retain control until the very end and, if the quality of your life is too poor, to decide to end your suffering; the dignity comes from exercising the choice.” says Jason Barber, whose wife, Kathleen Barber, died in his arms. He had one question in mind when she died. What was he going to say if someone asked him how she died? Whether she went peacefully? He decided to tell people that his wife died in peace, without any pain or suffering.
Life or Death Who chooses death over life? Sometimes we have to make this decision over a loved one when there is no hope for their recovery. It would be incredibly hard to make this life or death decision on another human being and twice as hard when it is someone we love. The author discusses the argument of this controversial topic of sustaining life at any cost or dying peacefully as an ethical issue. An ethicist, a person who specializes in or writes on ethics, can provide valuable discernment with respect to right and wrong motives or actions.
THE EUTHANASIA CONTROVERSY Summary Euthanasia has constantly been a heated debate amongst commentators, such as the likes of legal academics, medical practitioners and legislators for many years. Hence, the task of this essay is to discuss the different faces minted on both sides of the coin – should physicians and/or loved ones have the right to participate in active euthanasia? In order to do so, the essay will need to explore the arguments for and against legalizing euthanasia, specifically active euthanasia and subsequently provide a stand on whether or not it should be an accepted practice.