There is to many violence opportunities in this country. There are different levels of violence such as murder, assault/battery, robbery a theft combined with the use of force, various types of homicides, including murder and manslaughter, kidnapping, armed robbery, and sexual assault crimes. Though there is sub groups to the sexcual assult crimes. Such as rape, consensual rape, sexual battery or criminal sexual penetration. Though the main difference is the consent aspect of it. Rape would be an act of sexual intercourse using force or threat towards the person which can also cause unlawful body injury on the victim. Remembering that the victims do not give any form of consent to the person. Statutory rape is when both of the people engaging …show more content…
Another fact that can be brought up is that some minors are more mature than others. So why doesn 't this change the statutory rape laws. To make sure every court has an equal understanding otherwise it would only favor those on each case.To base Statutory laws on situational factors is really unfair. Laws can not be changed on each case basis. It is only fair when applied equally for everyone. That is why the state has chose the certain age that is reasonable for the people to consent. Though the individual cases for the reasons of health and drugs would have a different outcome connecting with the laws. These laws may annoy those few minors that are capable of granting consent, but they tend to protect far more minors who think sex isn 't a big deal. Therefore Statutory rape laws should not be changes since they really help individuals that are not ready for this step to becoming a victim to rape other than few …show more content…
Though on a personal level and subjectively. A big aspect of all this can be on the age of consent in each state. Once someone reaches the age of consent they can have sex with anyone older than them. In every state the age of consent can be from 16 through 18. In one state the age of consent is 18 so a 17 year old there having sex with a 25 year old man would be illegal, but if you go to another state with a consent of age 16 it would okay to have sex with that 25 year old man. If we are to do this then we all should be equal with the law and not based on each state. Also stating that some minors are more mature and logical than others. Depending on the youth, some can give understanding consent. A minor might understand enough to make this very large step with full a mature aspect about sex. While others might never develop the ability to make mature choices about sex. Since many are still naive about this situation and do not really take
This is seen as being effective as it is promoting the need to change existing sexual consent laws hopefully in order to achieve justice. This also highlight responsiveness of the government to responding to issues of the legal system regarding the NSW sexual consent laws. Another effectieve part of the legal system seen in this case is enforceability of the sexual consent laws. Although Mr Lazarus did undertake rape “without consent” he truly believed that Ms Mullins gave consent which according to the NSW sexual consent law stating that the accused must know the victim is not consenting is technically proof of enforceability of the law by Mr Lazard as he believed she gave consent. This case showed the effectiveness of protecting individual rights to a fair hearing as they allowed Mr Lazarus and Ms Millins to conduct a fair trial under section 24 of the Charter.
Kitchens said: “He called Crimes Against Children in Little Rock. They said they can’t do nothing about it because she’s 16 years old.” The age of consent in Arkansas is 16-year 's-old, making that the
Case: Roper v. Simmons (2005) Rule of the Case: The decision in which the Supreme Court held that it is unconstitutional to impose capital punishment for crimes committed under the age of 18. Facts: In Missouri, Christopher Simmons, age 17, made a plan to murder someone and bring along two of his friends, and one friend ended up dropping out. The plan was to break in and enter, tie up the victim, and toss the victim off a bridge. The case was brought to trial with exceeding evidence. Simmons confessed to the murder, videotaped reenactment of the crime, and testimony from Tessmer, the friend who backed out, that premeditation was involved.
The reasons for this is that a lot of these kids are committing adult crimes therefore, they should be tried as an adult. Furthermore, if they were not tried as an adult the violence that these kids bring to our society would be an outrage. They would be out here killing kids of their own age as well as adults. There’s also the possibility of them going out doing other dangerous and violent crimes because they would figure that just because of their age they could not be tried as an adult but in fact go to juvenile court where they will have a hearing by just a judge and not be tried by a jury which could possibly give them less time then what the crime carries.
Bryan Stevenson was born in the poor rural community of Milton Delaware in 1959. Stevenson grew up attending school in a segregated system where he first began noticing racial inequalities. His father had been murdered in a Philadelphia housing project when Stevenson was just a teenager, which he then began to question the racial and economic inequalities throughout his community. These injustices Stevenson had experience drove him into writing the profound book ‘Just Mercy’. Stevenson’s purpose for writing this book was to spread realization on the bias’ within the criminal justice system.
The JJDP Act was created to protect juveniles, however, each state has the right to establish the age limit that they considered an adult. Essentially, each state can have their own legal defined age limit for when an individual is no longer considered a juvenile. Most states in the U.S has seventeen as the age when a person is considered an adult under the law. However, Georgia, Texas and few other states have the juvenile cut off age at sixteen and in past times, other states had it as low as fifteen (Tiegen, 2017). Inherently, this means that a young man or woman can’t be taken from family or juvenile court to adult court and taken through the same due process as an adult at the tender age of fifteen.
Chapter 4 of Sexual Citizens presents a concerning idea of how sex among teens and young adults is described as "rapey". This suggests that there are instances of non-consensual sex happening that may not be recognized as assault. This paper explores the relationship between sex and rape, as well as the societal implications of sex. The paper also identifies the social implications of sex and how it has become a toxic culture of over exaggeration and comparison, leading to a disturbing fetishization of knowledge of the sex lives of others. While there is no easy solution to this problem, individuals can take steps to cultivate a better sex culture by making sex more personal without third parties.
A person convicted of statutory rape will be charged with a felony and face a prison sentence of a year or more , as well as fine, although the particular sentence depends on the state in which the defendant is convicted. Where a state has a romeo or juliet mitigation that lowers the crime to a felony when the defendant and a victim are close in age no more than a year in jail maximum.
When juveniles commit serious crimes they often only receive a minor slap on the wrist, possibly probation. These juveniles then continue to commit worse crimes as well as damage countless lives until they are put away for life as adults. The juvenile system is a place for minors who commit crimes, it has less harsh punishments and is easy going. In this system, there is a multitude of programs for minors to receive help, such as rehabilitation, psychiatric hospitals, in addition to counseling. Minors who have gone through this system come through multiple times due to the fact that they do not learn their lesson or receive the help they need.
If You Can’t Do The Time Don’t Do The Crime Nathaniel Abraham is 11 years old and got the world questioning. Nathaniel had acted with murder. The action was displayed in Michigan of 1997. By then, a law in Michigan was created explaining, “a child of any age may be tried as an adult for severe crimes.” This law shows the fair, just process of criminal action towards all, not just the older.
For this student, I think this definition is limited, it says between a child/adolescent and an adult, this student believes that sexual abuse can occur also between adults or between child/adolescents. A person 's age should not define if is sexual abuse or
I highly agree with Marjie, minors should be charged as adults if needed to, if the crime was pretty drastic then they should be punished as adults. Marjie Lundstrom states, ”These days for under-eighteen crowd,the group we routinely write off as “only kids.” It's why they can't smoke,or drink,or go to R movies without our OK.It’s why we fret over their internet access and fuss about driving privileges”, this statement was so accurate, she makes a point on how us teens have restrictions on certain things,so if we break one of these things it doesn't make a difference either way we should get a serious
1 out of every 6 women have been the victim of either attempted or completed rape(pause). 14.8% completed rape, 2.8% attempted rape, 15% of sexual assault and rape victims are under the age of 12(pause), 44% are under the age of 18(pause), 80% are under the age of 30. Any of those girls or women could end up pregnant and not be able to support or raise a child (pause). Rape victims can be minors and wouldn 't be mentally or physically prepared to care for a child (pause).
Consent can either always be recognised, never recognised or sometimes be recognised as a ground of justification. Consent always recognised is where if consent is given the accused can never be charged with that crime. The law should reflect the victim’s choice to consent as a legitimate excuse of individual autonomy. For example, property crimes with consent will not result in theft or malicious damage to property. Consent that is never recognised as defence is identified as ‘paternalism’.