Stem Cell Argumentative Essay

but one of the most arguable topics of all time is the use of embryonic stem cells. Some

Over time, research have shown that children are exposed to many encountering diseases, illnesses, and injuries. Intedning to a healthy child can be difficult sometimes, which is why pediatric care is needed. The study of medicine has evolved for centuries, creating new diagnosis and treatments. Pediatrics and other medical specialists are able to do this by the help of technology and tests.

Stem cell research has become one of the most controversial current topics of biology. This controversy comes from the idea that these stem cells are only embryonic stem cells, and the only way we get them is from the destruction of human embryos. By definition, a stem cells is an undifferentiated cell of a multicellular organism that is capable of giving rise to indefinitely more cells of the same type, and from which certain other kinds of cell arise by differentiation. Which simply means they are cells found in the human body that can create any other kind of human cell, so under further observation, stem cells could cure many diseases. Despite prior ideas, there are actually two types of stem cells, embryotic and somatic (adult) stem cells. To this day, ethics stand in the way of further scientific discovery and treatment.

Embryonic stem cell research is a process in which scientists isolate material from an embryo that was conceived five to seven days prior. At that point embryos are called blastocysts. The outer layer of the blastocyst will become the placenta while the inner cell mass will become a fetus. It is from the inner cell mass that scientists isolate the stem cells. Even though this research might become useful in the medical field, scientists should stop embryonic research because it is not productive, and there are better ways to get the desired results. Also, it is not moral to use and destroy embryos in this way.

Picture a scenario where a loved one was on the verge of death. Their organs were failing and they were too far down on the waiting list to get the organs they need in time. There was no other option that could save their life other than a human chimera transplant, but the use of chimeras shouldn’t be allowed. It is unethical to use them. Human chimera opposes many religions, has many scientific problems, and the stem cells used can transform into unwanted cells. Should one use a human chimera even if it opposed many global issues?

Stem-cells are cells that haven’t completely formed, and are able to become any tissue within the body. This can be used in today’s medical scene by replacing damaged cells with stem-cells that will over time be morph with the surrounding tissue and heal the damaged areas. “Some current therapies, such as bone marrow transplantation, already make use of stem-cells and there potential for regeneration of damaged tissues” (Stoppler, pg.5). There are manly two ways of getting the stem-cells,

Stem cell research is a very controversial topic in this day in age. It has been frowned upon for the ethical, political, and moral issues. The research has many benefits that may lead to major breakthroughs in medicine. Many people are blinded by the negatives of the research and don’t try to develop an understanding of the positive effects the research may provide. These cells have the power to change medicine for the better. The many setbacks and conflicts will not get in the way of this life-saving research.

Stem cells are cells that haven’t differentiated yet. They have the ability to divide and make an indefinite number of copies of themselves. Other cells in the body can only replicate a limited number of times before they begin to break down. When a stem cell divides, it can either remain a stem cell or turn into a differentiated cell, such as a muscle cell or a red blood cell.

This essay discusses the ethical aspects of using human embryos to obtain stem cells which can be used to treat various diseases and even save lives. I will mostly focus on the moral status of the embryo and whether or not it should be considered a human, I am going

Human embryonic stem cells were known before a decade ago that they could be extremely adaptable and could be converted into any type of cell in the body (heart, liver, blood). Stem cell investigators in the year 1998 were able to develop human embryonic stem cells and started the new era called “regenerative medicine” where they can develop ways in which they can replace diseased and injured cells in bodies with serious illnesses. (3)

Can you imagine undergoing a treatment that can essentially create havoc for your genes and your body? It’s hard to imagine, but it’s actually here. Gene therapy has been around since 1972 and is still under development before humans could undergo this process or treatment. It consists of using sections of DNA or specifically genes and has created a lot of controversy worldwide. However, there are a handful of people who argue that gene therapy is another possible treatment option for diseases such as hemophilia. Others believe that this treatment option is just “playing God [and as seen as being] ‘sacrilegious’” (Bose, 2010). Gene therapy is unethical, as it can greatly negatively impact human kind, because it can cause more disorders to arise,

Cancer, heart disease, blood disorders, nerve disorders, and many more genetic diseases are affecting millions of people around the world. The more society advances, the more degenerate diseases are affecting the citizens. For a number of years researchers have been searching for cures. With new developments in gene editing, treatments for many diseases are just around the corner. Gene editing with new technology, CRISPR, matches with a specific gene and splits the protein. The researchers then combine the broken gene with a healthy gene. This new healthy gene is now modified and free from the mutation it had before. Although many individuals’ ethics and morals stand in the way of gene editing, this technology affects society in many different

Science has enabled us to thrive in a world where change is a must if an organism wishes to live. It has allowed for us to bend and twist the world at our feet, even having enough strength to repel the touch of death. Genetic engineering is the next scientific advancement that will stand close in the near future. It has the capability of modifying the food production process, elimination of diseases and disorders, and the guarantation of the best traits in an organism.

Ethics is a sub-discipline of philosophy which is basically concerned with morals and defining right and wrong behaviour. Research ethics involves the application of ethical principles to many fields involving research including human experimentation, animal experimentation and academic research. Many of these fields of research have different ethical issues, for example the ethical issues academic research mainly consist of plagiarism and falsifying data. Human medical testing has very different ethical issues such as voluntary informed consent. Voluntary informed consent was first put forward by the Nuremberg Code which is a set of research ethics for human experimentation that were created after the horrific and deadly experiments conducted

Most people in our society, no matter what level of education that they may have, have heard of the cloning, specifically the cloning of Dolly the lamb, and have some notions regarding the idea of cloning humans. "The successes in animal cloning suggest to some that the technology has matured sufficiently to justify its application to human cloning" (Jaenisch et al.). However, not every agrees that human cloning is a something that should be put into practice (Hoskins). There generally seem to be two basic divisions on this issue: those who find it inappropriate and unethical, and those who find it a reasonable and necessary step in the progression of scientific research (Lustig).