For example, sweatpants are not against dress code but they don’t show professionalism. They are also just students and should be able to live the child life as long as they can. These reasons are why dress codes should be banned. There should be no school dress code because it limits the freedom of expression, targets girls, and they are hard to enforce. Girls should not have to follow extra rules because boys can't control themselves around girls.
But, does gender really matter to influence a person’s future trajectory? “Missing in Interaction”, written by Myra and David Sadker, is an article to discuss why girls are invisible in schools. With the studies in elementary schools, the authors conclude that “gender segregation is a major contributor to female invisibility”. Teachers would like to spend more time and attention on male students because they are full of vitality and creativity; whereas, teachers only say OK to female students since they do not care about girls’ achievement on academic. In their minds, a woman is hard to be an excellent scientist or engineering even though female students’ scores are better than male students’.
Thus, Betty claims that rather of seeing their style as markers of class distinction, the school personal saw las chicas’s performance as evidence of their heterosexual interest. Although, Betty mentions that both las chicas and the preps were sexually active, only las chicas were seen as too sexually active. In other words, their performances became to be reduced as sexual and racial differences, but not on differences in class. According to Betty, this impacted las Chicas, not only in their educational setting, but also on their class futures. For instance, Betty claims that since the school personal saw las chicas’s performance as oversexualized, they placed them on
It may decrease the amount of bullies, yet it makes you a target for bullies outside of the school. It also encourages discipline, yet not from the child's parent. After people read others opinions they usually vacillate, this is because they come to a epiphany of how many cons it brings to their children and themselves. Parents usually pick schools in hierarchy and those schools often require uniforms. Some people may wish to dress bourgeois but not all schools are immaculate.
Those three concepts has undermine the confidence, integrity and maturely of these young high school because the root of the affect is so damaging. We see the consist battle that school programs try to protect the necessities of girl but still fail. Larkin critiques the fact that girls are more likely to be pursed to take nontraditional class because girls aren’t stimulated enough to comprehend. Still Failing at Fairness by Sadker and Zittelmen explained that same ideas that young girls are not encouraged nor given the same opportunity as the boys. According to Sadler and Zittelmen,” they documented the public silence of girls from school through graduate school, (119).
In “X: A Fabulous Child’s Story”, Lois Gould reveals that she thinks gender stereotypes are unnecessary and negative. In the story, girls are expected by society to behave a certain way while boys are expected by society to behave another way (Gould). For example, Jim’s character starts “wheeling his little sister's doll carriage around the football field” which is a behavior his parents disapprove of (Gould). In this way, gender stereotyping limits what boys and girls feel is acceptable behavior which can prevent children from being themselves and contributing to society in their own ways. Expecting girls for example, to “vacuum the carpet” and expecting boys to “mow the lawn” forces the idea that girls and boys must each conform to gender
Most service members who try cope with the sickness end up do more damage to themselves before they realize they might need help. The first thing they turn to is alcohol because in the in the army you is not authorized to show weakness but then is alright to get hammed. Anger is one of the symptoms which comes out easily when someone has PTSD. They think people should see their pain and realize it. They channeled everything to themselves and let their emotions control them, busting out with anger every little thing happens, yelling and not wanting to deal with people.
School dress codes can lead people to be embarrassed, lose self-esteem, violate people 's first amendment right of freedom of speech, and some dress codes are labeled as gender biased towards women. School dress codes can very easily harm a kids chance at being successful not only in school, but in future life as well, if they never feel comfortable in their own skin. If they can not show off who they truly are, then why do schools highlight the importance on a child 's social emotional learning, if they themselves are harming the kids. Although school dress codes do take away economic differences in school, does that qualify as a good enough reason to harm a child’s right of self-expression? I don’t believe, children need to be taught to share with people who they are and not be hiding behind a piece of clothing they were told to wear.
6) Students are ashamed of having a dark complexation. This is because they are constantly teased with prejudicial treatment. As a teen I had to deal with boys not being attracted to me because I was of the darker complexation. They would choose the girls who were light skin or white because those were the girls who were considered pretty. This is a form of colorism, impacting a student education and wellbeing.
For instance, a little kid has been told that sky comprises of brown color and him thing the same because of lack of color knowledge. Similarly, Parents and guardians should aware their children regarding a good and bad touch so that they will be secure from being assaulted, that is the primary reason for a high ratio of sexual abuse because parents feel weird to discuss it with their children. Disobeying an adult can sometimes result in getting into trouble with a child, and being in trouble is something children understand and fear. Children might be told that their mothers will not love them anymore or that they will be sent away because the touching is their fault. They don’t know yet that adults can tell lies, so they believe what they are told.
Bokser states, “Her portrayal of the female intellectual is markedly different from the classical image of the bodiless masculine mind” (12). This implies Sor Juana’s body structure interrupts her from learning. The female mind and a male mind, have dissimilar ways of comprehending. An example Bokser presents is when Sor Juana was an adolescent she stayed away from eating cheese because she heard it caused stupidity and if she failed to learn a lesson in a certain time frame she would cut her hair as a punishment