What does it mean to be guilty or innocent? Guilty means someone responsible of doing the wrong, supported by proof. While Innocent means he/she not responsible of the crime and (again) supported by proof. If one is the headmaster of the crime he/she must figure out a way to get out of it, if not then it was their intentions to be sent to jail. Of course if that person is trying to prevent going to jail for the law they just broke he/she have to lie and/or twist their story a bit. In this manslaughter case in the book Monster Steve Harmon is accused of being guilty in manslaughter of checking if it was safe for James King to rob a drugstore. Steve was indeed at the scene of the crime but was he actually apart of the crime, and if he was were is the proof to actually show he was involved in the crime? Steve Harmon is innocent of felony murder because there is no evidence and he was not there at the crime.
In every case in trial there should always be some type of evidence to prove/support reason why is one’s guilty. A bystander could also be strong evidence for a case in court, in this book a person was actually present in this accidental murder,
…show more content…
“I know that because I was planning to do the film of my neighborhood over the holidays” (Myers ). As Steve stated around at time and day the robbery happened he was busy planning his film project. Mr. Sawicki also believe Steve was in fact not apart of the robbery from the time and effort he put in his film footage. And Sawicki also explain “to make an honest film must have an honest person.” (Myers ) As a teacher who like his student this much clearly have show Steve is a good student in Sawicki film class. So by previous work Steve done in film making and the weeks/days planning of a project that was assigned while this incident happened, was not in involved with the
While there are multiple pieces of evidence which try to portray Steven as guilty, there are countless more pieces that prove him innocent. After knowing about the mysterious blood found is Halbach’s car and the undeniable fact that Andrew Colbourn knew about the site of the victim’s vehicle before it was found by the search party. Subsequently, the very unreliable James Lenk found they keys and the reality that Steven was the only suspect investigated. This evidence should be raising some questions in your mind; ‘How can an innocent man be punished for a crime he so undoubtedly didn’t
B) Relevant evidence, will show if the round fired into Abbot matched the weapon discovered in the car. This will link the murder weapon to the murderer C) Physical D) Circumstantial A) Statement from the next door neighbors Jack and Jill, stating they heard a gun go off in Abbot’s house. B)
Steven said that he was not guilty and he dropped her not harmed. He also said that he just happened to look back while he stopped on a bridge riding his bike and he saw that Lynne entered into a grey car. Some witnesses testified that Steven really did all those things. They also said that they saw Steven normal on the school grounds.
Caleb Sirmans Bridget Tomlison 9th grade Lit/Comp 13 Febuary 2023 An astonishing 93% of the inmates in the United States prison system are males. While incarceration impacts each prisoner differently, thier lives are forever changed. Although the fictional account of Steve Harmon’s time behind bars details his own individual struggles, it often mirrors the experiences of many real-life inmates.
If I were on the jury, I would have voted to acquit Steve Harmon. I would acquit Steve Harmon because he was just a kid and was, if he was apart of the crime at all, probably pressured into it by King. Also Steve Harmon gave a very compelling story when he was on the stand. On top of that Mr. Sawicki said that he is an outstanding young man and that Steve is very involved in depicting his neighborhood in a positive
The only factor that tells the real story of what happened to Nichols that night was a nearby street camera capturing
The book ended ambiguously and left the reader to question whether or not Steve was truly innocent. Because of the numerous questionable scenes/parts in the novel, I believe that Steve Harmon is guilty of being a participant in the crime that led to death of Mr. Nesbitt. Would a man who was innocent continuously change his story? Steve’s statements regarding his whereabouts and what he was doing on the day of the murder is inconsistent. Steve stated that he just went inside
Do you get along better with a certain parent more than you do with the other. For example, maybe you get along with your mother more than you get along with your father because she is more understanding. In the book Monster by Walter Dean Myers the main character is named Steve Harmon. He is in court because he is being accused of being involved in the murder of a drugstore owner, Mr. Nesbitt. Steve’s parents each visit Steve at different times, and both have different views on whether he is guilty or innocent.
Monster essay There are a lot of people who make bad decisions. Steve Harmon just happened to be one of them. Monster is a book written by 16-year-old Steve Harmon. Who got accused of a crime, that also ended up in in murder.
Steve Harmon is not guilty. There are many reason to support as to why that statement is true. The crime that took place on the 22 of December was a crime that Steve Harmon was not involved in. As a member of the jury, the law states that one has to acknowledge that Steve Harmon is innocent until proven guilty. One of the prosecution witnesses, Lorelle Henry, provides evidence that supports Steve’s innocence.
To give to you the testimony of a woman who has no reason to lie and is saying he wasn’t there. And finally to prove he had absolutely no connection to the crime at all. First of, all of the people who testify against steve are all criminals with heavy jail time to do. The only way out for them is to accuse someone else and put them in jail instead. Bobo, when confronted with this, says: “What you saying?
Steve believes that he is a monster. He dislikes being on trial and does not want to be in jail anymore. The book Monster was written by Walter Dean Myers. He wrote about a boy named Steve Harmon. Steve has been put in jail for felony murder, later on he gets put on trial.
“A person is innocent until proved guilty in a court of law” In the play Twelve Angry Men by Reginald Rose, an 18-year-old is on trial for the murder of his father. After many pieces of evidence, the three that are in doubt are the old man hearing “I’m going to kill you!” as well as the weapon of choice and how it was replicated, and finally the woman’s testimony. In my opinion, the boy could have been proven guilty, based on these the boy is not guilty.
Perceptions from others can be cruel. Criminals are often thought of negatively by themselves and are also disrespected by others in society. The novel Monster presents the impressions people have about Steve Harmon, an accused criminal on trial for robbery and murder. Furthermore, the text explains Steve’s views of himself during and after time in prison from first person point-of-view. The novel Monster by Walter Dean Myers highlights the various perceptions that exist about an accused criminal.
Is someone thought to be innocent capable of murder? In the short story " The Moose and the Sparrow" written by Hugh Garner, a nineteen year old boy named Cecil arrives at a lumber camp, claiming to need money for college. Cecil is a small and skinny boy, and is clearly very weak and frail, but highly intelligent. He makes an unwanted enemy of a giant of a man named Moose Maddon. Moose, jealous of Cecil's cleverness, bullies him to whaht seems like the breaking point.