ipl-logo

Stop And Frisk Case Study

523 Words3 Pages

Stop and Frisk has been a controversial issue since it was first enacted in 1964. Stop and Frisk is a officer protection procedure where a person is stopped for what the officer deems "reasonably suspicious" and then if needed the officer will frisk the person for weapons. The part that has been deemed controversial and what had many departments in hot water was the fact that many of the citizens were being stopped solely on their race and because they were in a bad part of town.
Former Mayor Bloomberg of New York City rejected the idea of the courts when they declared stop and frisk as unconstitutional. He accused the judge of not giving the city a fair trial and said they would appeal the ruling so that they could allow the current stop and frisk procedures to continue. In 2014, the new Mayor Bill de Blasio and police commissioner Bill Bratton chose to accept the court ruling and work together to try and reform the city. Judge Schiendlin ordered many remedies which included body cameras and a federal monitor. She also ordered a "joint remedial process" where public comments were heard about how to reform the department 's policies. Changes to the department also included training, supervising, discipline, and monitoring of officers. New rules were also implemented to stop the police from …show more content…

It is stated in Broken Windows Theory that if you deal with the small crimes then it will help deter the larger ones. Stop and frisk is supposed to help deter the smaller crimes, however, many believed that there was too much emphasis on Broken Windows and that 's what lead to the stop and frisk procedures getting out of hand. While the city has all but stopped doing stop and frisk, broken windows still remains. It is unclear if Bratton and de Brasio will budge on broken windows. For example, the city will no longer arrest people for publicly possessing under 25 grams of marijuana which is a common broken windows

Show More
Related

  • David Floyd's Stop, Question And Frisk Report

    557 Words  | 3 Pages

    David Floyd was the lead plaintiff amongst others, Lalit Clarkson, Deon Dennis, and David Ourlicht in the 2013 New York City Police Department (NYPD) Stop and Frisk lawsuit. Floyd claimed that on February 27, 2008, he was walking on the path nearby to his house in the Bronx, New York. He encountered the basement tenant, also an African–American man, locked out of his apartment. Before they could open the door, three NYPD officers approached them and asked the two men what they were doing, told them to stop, and proceeded to frisk them. The officers claimed they had stopped Floyd because they believed Floyd was attempting a burglary.

    Read More

  • Racial Profiling In Bob Herbert's Jim Crow Policing

    295 Words  | 2 Pages

    New York Police Officers feel no commitment in having to treat any black or Hispanic with respect because of their race. The generic debate made by Bob Herbert in his work, Jim Crow Policing, is that stops are a representation of cops being racist and harassers as well. More precisely Herbert feuds that racial profiling has become a tool of harassment. Herbert states, “Rather than a legitimate crime-fighting tool, these stops are a despicable racially oriented tool of harassment”(NY Times Herbert). In the passage, Herbert is specifying that blacks and Hispanics were commonly stopped and frisked for their race.

    Read More

  • Bill Bratton's Broken Windows Theory

    556 Words  | 3 Pages

    This was not the case in the 1980s. As a result, only certain parts of the broken windows theory were embraced. Policies across the country focused on heavily policing disorder, but largely ignored the community-building aspect. Bill Bratton’s reign as New York City Transit Police Chief in 1990, and later as NYPD Commissioner from 1994-1996, saw him embracing this movement. The broken windows theory was established to target small problems throughout neighborhoods, such as vandalism on walls, litter on sidewalks, or broken windows in abandoned buildings.

    Read More

  • Broken Crime Theory

    255 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Broken Windows Theory is effective at preventing crime by cracking down on urban disorder. Broken Windows policing has reduced the number of shootings, murders and other violent crimes in New York City. Through the implementation of Broken Windows policing in New York City, businesses were able to grow because they no longer had to fear having their money or goods stolen by delinquents. Broken Windows policing in New York City encouraged the growth of tourism; by cleaning up the streets and removing criminals, outsiders felt safe visiting. This reinvigoration on New York City also helped cause the influx of new residents because people were able to take the subway and walk down the streets without fear of being mugged or assaulted.

    Read More

  • Stop Question And Frisk Case Study

    1113 Words  | 5 Pages

    An officer has the right to stop an individual in public if he has a reasonable doubt of suspicion to temporary stop and frisks the individual. The statistic has shown that many officers have targeted the minorities in the stop and frisk. According to An Analysis of the NYPD 's stop and frisk policy in the context of the claim of racial bias by Andrew Gelman, Jeffrey Fagan, Alex Kiss " the number of arrests of each group in the previous year black were stopped 23% and Hispanics 39% more often than whites"(19). Minorities are stopped twice as often for violent crimes and a

    Read More

  • Stop And Frisk Persuasive Essay

    424 Words  | 2 Pages

    Intrinsically, Trump’s implementation of stop and frisk is immoral and unconstitutional. It could cause major backlash from organizations that cater to people of color and people who are of a lower

    Read More

  • Stop And Frisk Research Paper

    1132 Words  | 5 Pages

    This law usually targets youth and people of color and this is extremly important reasons to stop it. A first example that shows that the law is not legal is that tons of people who get stopped are innocent. The second example that shows the illegality of the law would be that it is a discriminatory and racist law. However, other people have different opinions, other people think that "stop and frisk" help protects people from people that look suspicious and may risk the safety our society. " Stop and frisk" should not be a law because instead of helping and protecting people it discriminates against people and disrespects the.

    Read More

  • Racial Profiling: A Major Problem In Today's Society

    325 Words  | 2 Pages

    300359810 Mrs. Fahey ERWC 12-Period 2 14 September 2015 Racial Profiling Racial discrimination is becoming a major problem in today 's society. Our nation is facing problems based on the discrimination on race, ethnicity, religion or national origin. Racial profiling is a clear violation of the civil rights of the United States.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Racial Profiling

    1530 Words  | 7 Pages

    Racial profiling is a very important issue that individuals in society face every day. This problem occurs in low income or poverty-stricken areas throughout cities and communities across the nation. Hundreds of anecdotal testimonials allege that law enforcement officials at all levels of government are infringing upon the constitutional rights and civil liberties of racial and ethnic minorities through a practice called “racial profiling” (Ward, 2002). So what is racial profiling? According to the National Institute of Justice, racial profiling by law enforcement is commonly defined as a practice that targets people for suspicion of crime based on their race, ethnicity, religion or national origin (National Institute of Justice, 2013).

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Stop And Frisk

    796 Words  | 4 Pages

    There has been many controversial issues about the “stop-and-frisk” law. One side believes that it is racially profiling the communities of minorities and the other side believes that it is helping communities rise away from violence. There is a lot of history and background on stop-and-frisk and how it originated in the United States, especially in different places around the world. This law has been very controversial even within the law itself, so controversial states are debating on getting rid of it completely. Many politicians speak on this tactic in both positive and negative ways and the statistical growths and decreases on this topic.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Stop And Frisk

    780 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Consequences of Disparate Policing: Evaluating Stop and Frisk as a Modality of Urban Policing. Minnesota Law Review, 101(6),

    Read More

  • Stop And Frisk Summary

    115 Words  | 1 Pages

    In the article “The Statistical Debate Behind The Stop-and-Frisk Verdict”, John Cassidy analyzes the conclusion of Judge Scheindlin in which states that Stop and Frisk amounts to a policy of indirect racial profiling. In the analysis it is mentioned that Judge Scheindlin feels that the these methods of approach to prevent crime is unconstitutional. She challenges this by using the four and fourteenth amendment which police violate with stop-and-frisk which is an unreasonable search, and the discrimination towards Blacks and Latinos by being stopped a lot more frequently than whites, which is not equal protection under the law. Ultimately Cassidy’s report is to convey Judge Scheindlin’s stance on the method of policing being used today.

    Read More

  • Argumentative Essay On Stop And Frisk

    535 Words  | 3 Pages

    Stop and Frisk Stop and Frisk, the tactic that has been going on for only for short time, yet there seems to be racial tension already. But is this new information actually true or is it just good policing? According to Heather Mac Donald from the Manhattan Institute, says “what looks like racial profiling might just be good policing”. However according to Ranjana Natarajan from the Washington post “it’s clear that two issues need to be addressed: racial profiling and police use of excessive force.” Unfortunately we cannot have both ways.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Broken Windows Theory

    1147 Words  | 5 Pages

    Summary Of Argument, Methods: In 1968, stop and frisk was based on strict guidelines that explained how far an officer can frisk someone according to the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments. Behind the police officers’ stop and frisks, the strategies of broken windows policing and the zero-tolerance policy were introduced. Broken windows theory began in New York during the year of 1982, and former Mayor Giuliani of New York created zero-tolerance policy in 1997. Broken windows was a known policing strategy throughout all departments in the nation.

    Read More

  • Broken Windows Theory Essay

    1172 Words  | 5 Pages

    The purpose of this essay was to discuss whether or not a broken windows styles of policing would lead to negative results in an impacted area, if it was possible to have assertive and proactive police efforts that did not generate negative complaints and if having a quality of life approach to policing would be beneficial and

    Read More

More about Stop And Frisk Case Study

Open Document