Every company tends to apply the organization structure that is most suitable, and there is no perfectly correct or wrong way to build a business. Whether a particular organization structure is beneficial or detrimental to the company depends on the company 's strategy, the type of business, management style and its target market. In choosing the organizational structure of the company, the management is looking to bring the company 's moving components together into a coordinated, effective and efficient unit. The choice is extremely significant because the right people and work portfolio facilitate business activities and allow employees to complete the company 's strategic, mission and vision. Based on the answers above, the existing …show more content…
Unfortunately, there are few disadvantages of the functional organization structure. One of the major drawbacks is that it will cause poor communication and coordination between different functions. Since functional units are not responsible for each other, they may have difficulty in cooperation and inter-departmental conflict situation. They only concerned about their jobs, and ignore the outside world. In addition, because of the standardized mode of operation, the organization may be rigid, not adaptable and flexible enough to fit the dynamic …show more content…
Nevertheless, there are some disadvantages of matrix organization structure. The matrix organization structure is more complex than functional organization structure, considered as the toughest form to work in which creating a conflict on chain of command, responsibility and authority between the employees. This may lead to staff frustration and confusion, because the report line is not clear. It may also be difficult for employees to set priorities when they are moving between competing projects. The matrix structure implementation is usually forced to the organization, not the response to the real demand. They are imposed on employees who are accustomed to working in a traditional hierarchical environment and do not provide appropriate training. The main conceptual benefits of the new matrix organization, such as flexibility and efficiency, are the actual flaws in the conflict because the organization is immersed in the new equipment shortage. The failure of the matrix structure in the 1970s caused a sharp decline in popularity. "By the mid-1980s, it was hard to find anyone to maintain matrix management". Many organizations decided to abandon this concept. (KrzysztofGoś, M.A, 2015) Additionally, matrix organization structure involves highly cost as there will be much information and paper work collection. Most of the employees are experts in the specific area and they are given high facilities, salaries and incentives. There will be a difficult task to balance
The structure determines power, roles and responsibilities of each worker in the business and helps to ensure is able to understand their duty as an employee. It is important for a large company to have an organisational structure as it creates guidance for all employees because they’re able to understand where they stand as an employee and who to go to for any help or queries. Another reasons why they’re important is because it streamlines the companies’ operations and helps identify the different teams that you have
Y (2011) Managing the Dynamics of New Product Development Processes: A New Product Lifecycle Management Paradigm Hall. K (2013) Making the Matrix Work: How Matrix Managers Engage People and Cut Through Complexity Sutherland. I (1997) Organisation Structures and Processes Appendix
Introduction A company’s success is measured by how well it is structured and organized in order to adapt to the changes in environment as well as the changes within itself such as the company’s scale, employees, product scope, etc. Having a suitable, well-structured organizational frame will not only increase the chance of being success but also prolong the company’s lifespan compared to an un-structured one. It is important to note that an organization’s structure needs to fit in with the current situation and does not necessarily required remain unchanged over time. Taking Dynacorp as an example, even though its functional structure contributed to the vast growth of the company at the start, its limitation in dealing with the changes within
Advantages and disadvantages of working within teams or groups with reference to relevant business communications theory This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of working within teams or groups with reference to relevant business communications theory. We live in an age where effective and efficient communication is critical to ensure a high performing team or group. In most organisations working within teams or groups is extremely common.
1. What does it "starting where the client is" meant to you as a social worker? Starting where the client is means that the clinician must avoid judgments, must listen carefully to discern what the client is feeling and thinking and not to step either too far away, or move too quickly ahead to where she/he think the client needs to be at (Benatar, 2011). The client is the only person that know their situation best. 2.
PROFILE OF A GREAT INNOVATOR Report by Bagavathi Ghanesan, BSBINN502, Task 1 Innovation is an idea must be replicable at an economical cost and must satisfy a specific need. Innovation involves deliberate application of information, imagination and initiative in deriving different values from resources. It includes all processes by new ideas are generated and converted into useful products. In business, innovation often results when ideas are applied by the company to further satisfy the needs and expectations of the customers. There are four important types of innovation which are process, product, marketing and organizational.
The organizational structure can be seen as an outline of what branch of a company is to carry out
Do you know the importance of having a hierarchy structure within any given work space? Without structure there would be no clear line of communication between workers. Having a structure in a workplace establishes communication skills, defuses conflicts, and also provides awareness of leaders who are in charge of you.
However, both of these conditions are quite difficult to achieve in the workplace. The implications of this research in the real world are evident and plenty. This research provides a general framework for how businesses and groups should operate. Instituting a hierarchy is an essential step to an organized and efficient firm. Based on the results and conclusion of this article, the researchers took the initiative of supplying more advice on effective business managing that had been extrapolated from their data.
Do you think Alice Thornton’s proposal to decentralize the rules and procedures of Cosmo Plastics will work? Alice proposal of decentralizing the rules and procedures in Cosmo Plastics has a bigger chance of working out in a big company with different departments and great number of employees, because then daily operations and decision-making are divided into different authorities in the organization from the top managements, to the middle and lower level managements. Especially when you have this flexibility in work hours, because some departments in the company need constant attention and discipline from the side of employees, decentralizing is needed to divide the controlling process. On another scale, small groups will be formed, employees
Functional structure: it improves particular section in an organization according of skills and works and associates their workers into particular section of functional areas. To manage and control this structure is simple when compared to other, so assists in developing the effectiveness. Nevertheless, the organization will fall won if effective communication within these section of function is lack. 2. Divisional structure: it the structure that is an organization makes division according of geography, market, product and service.
The different type of structures (1) Functional – each portion of the organisation is grouped according to its purpose. (2) Matrix - ‘’ creates project teams that cut across traditional functional departments, instead of highlighting the role or status of individuals, it gathers together a team of specialists with the objective of completing a task or a project successfully ‘’ . (3) Divisional – It is the grouping of workers on the basis of products being produced, followed by the functional structure. There are two types of divisional structure , (a) Product structure (b) Process structure (4) Geographical – It is the grouping of workers on the basis of regions, followed by the functional structure and , (5) Hierarchical structure which has been adopted by Ritz Carlton. It shows the different levels of hierarchy, span of control and chain of command.
The four building blocks of competitive advantage can be used to help a company become more profitable and stay ahead of their competition. The four factors are superior efficiency, quality, innovation, customer responsiveness. All four building blocks are important to any company. However, I believe that customer responsiveness is the most important because having loyal and happy customers can make or break any company. The four building blocks can help companies grow and become the leader in their industry over their rivals.
4. Influence of traditional hierarchy gets reduced. 5. Tim Cook has the ultimate decision making power on all the department functions. Disadvantages of the current functional organizational structure are as follows: 1.
It acts as an operating manual that defines the way the jobs are distributed and how individuals interact within the company to achieve their goals (Distelzweig, 2004). A detailed study on organizational structure relates organizational structure to the way information flows through the hierarchical arrangement. There are basically two types of organizational structure; centralized and decentralized. In a centralized system the highest layer of hierarchy is responsible for decision making and controlling departments and division.