The second difference is Yang and Salmivalli (2013) focused on the background of how people can be bully, can be victims and bully victims. While Bowers, Smith & Binney (1994) focused on specific situation and the forms of bully that bullies most likely to use in school and what is the reason for bully- victims to be highly maladjasted more than pure bullies and pure victims. The other differences is that the effects of doing the form research were small (Bowers et al., 1994). On the other hand, from doing a family research (Yang & Salmivalli, 2013) it links to other area such as family system, involvement with others and also parenting style. Which can leads to other research that could be useful in the future. Strengths The strengths of Bully- Victims (Yang & Salmivalli, 1994) research is firstly, the sample is large. It means that the sample represent the population, so the sample could be generalized. Even though large sample might be complicated and takes too long, but the result most likely to be realistic. The second strength is that the researcher used self and peer reports to identify the subgroups, which can reduce the biasness. So the test most likely to be reliable and valid (Yang & Salmivalli, 1994). The strength of Family is that the test is specific. The four measurement focus on the different area that the researcher interested in. The results of this study is more accurate (Bowers et al., 1994). Weaknesses The weakness is that the sample is too
In Pappas 's article, she gives suggestions on how to handle bullying as a parent. I believe that this is just a band-aid. The suggestions she gives won 't fix the problem. Pappas states that if a child is more social it will prevent bullying. She supports her solutions by giving supporting sources.
55% of participants both male and female have been brutally beaten as a child multiple times and majority of the act was perpetrated by their mum; 30% felt lack of care and neglect from their parents and care givers. The peer and sibling Victimization survey revealed that 95% of the young adults feel safe at school presently. However, 36% of responders have been deliberately hit on their genitals by someone while growing up either as a form of bully or otherwise; 29% of responders confirmed that they were bully victims as kids and 59% had enjoyed being the bully in the past. 15 in 22 (68.1%) have been involved with physical harm to other people while 13 in 24 (54.2%) witnessed other student who bring guns or other form of weapon to school as a child; 7 participants (29.1%) had taken a gun to school in the past (6 male and 1 female). Offensive words and language are common amongst them while growing up as 67% confirms that they experienced such as a kid and even from their life partners.
The data were processed and analyzed using SPSS version 18. Frequencies, cross tabulation, Pearson’s, chi-square test, ANOVA were used to analyze the data. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically
This is evident when the author writes “...bullying is damaging and can be emotionally and psychologically devastating…” and “Step 1 - Be Aware and pay attention… Step 2 - Recognize it is a problem and don't ignore it…” The first piece of evidence explains that you can be emotionally and psychologically damaged from bullying and your self-confidence affects how you are emotionally so when bullied you won’t be able to do your personal best. The second piece of evidence is one of the many steps that explains how to deal with bullying and prevent it which can teach students at Baker how to prevent and deal with bullying allowing them to be more self-confident and do their personal best. “Bullying Epidemic: Facts, Statistics, Prevention” can really help Baker students be their personal best by informing students on how to prevent bullying and hopefully be less of it, which then boosts their confidence in both themself and
The authors did an outstanding job presenting their findings in a way in which the reader can make their own judgments about the topic. Additionally, the authors did an exceptional job outlining the pros and cons of their own study. Graham and Louis 2010 state “We recognize this study has a number of limitation” (p.173). The authors recognize the findings may be inaccurate because of the size and interest of the sample population. The authors concludes this article with a detailed explanation why an individual could question the foundation on which their hypothesis is built.
Bullies are usually stronger and victims are usually perceived as weaker and unable to protect themselves.” (Masterson,1997) Bullying expands in many aspects of everyday life; from schoolchildren and teenagers, to adults , working environments and even spouses and family members. Considering that the first signs of bullying appear among schoolchildren, we should examine it in its infancy, that is, bullying in early years and school life, which in turn becomes with the passage of years violence and in some cases even crime. As far as bullying at school is concerned, “one definition is that a student is being bullied or victimized, when he or she is exposed, repeatedly and over time , to negative actions on the part of one or more other students.”
Annotated Bibliography Sarahi Ali Gutierrez Nevada State College Annotated Bibliography Annotation 1 Piskin, M. (2002). School bullying: definition, types, related factors, and strategies to prevent bullying problems. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 2(2), 555.
Power of Bullying “Did you know that bully victims are between 2 to 9 times more likely to consider suicide than non-victims, according to studies by Yale University?” (“Bullying Statistics”). Bullying has become an increasingly popular topic in high schools and middle schools across the country. Throughout the nation there are many schools, organizations, and websites that are used to inform students and teachers about the effects of bullying. But, is only talking about the effects of bullying enough to stop it?
Name: Syed Saheemuddin Topic: Bullying Thesis Statement: Bullying has long been a practice witnessed in schoolyards and classrooms across the country. To varying degrees, bullying has been proven to cause anxiety and depression in teens. Today's generation of teenagers, however, experience a heightened sense of fear due to increases in violent bullying behavior Background: Bullying is most common way if showing hatred toward others in today's society. family genetics play a big part because the type of behavior a child is raised upon, most likely he will end up doing the same things.
Bullying is a widespread problem in our schools and communities and has a negative impact on students’ right to learn in a safe and secure environment without fear. It is a process in which one person repeatedly uses his/her superior strength or influence to mistreat, attack or force another person to do something (Van der Werf, 2014). Bullying or peer victimization is now recognized as a complex and pervasive problem (Beran, 2009). It is an ongoing problem that is not restricted by age, race, gender or class. This behavior generally takes one of four forms, physical such as assault, verbal which involves threats or insults, social which entails exclusion or rumor spreading, and cyber which includes aggressive texts or social network posts
For example if bulling continues at school and school doesn’t take action on this attitude, the entire school can be affected. Student may get anxious and tend to not like school. As the adults don’t take action and try to prevent bulling, children may feel that teachers and other school staff have little control over the students and don’t care what happens to them. Moreover Students who witness bullying can also be affected. They may feel guilty for not helping or scared that they will be the next target (gomasa, n.d.).
CRIME OR CHILDISH ACTION? Adolescence years which are the most important times of someone 's life are about self-awareness, searching for a new identity, formation of personality and not only physical but also mental changes and it can be affected by anything. Along with changing hormones and environment where student lives or is exposed to, there may be observed violent behaviors and/or bullying actions. Bullying can have different connotation for different people but as a dictionary definition, it means abuse and mistreatment of someone vulnerable by someone stronger, more powerful ( Marriam-Webstar Dictionary). Among the students, especially in the high schools, bullying is some kind of power-seeking and it is a common behavior.
Historically, the most momentous turning point of bullying happened in the mid 1970’s where a research professor of psychology Dan Olweus, conducted an intensive
Georgiou et al (2013) conducted in Cyprus. He questioned 231 young adolescents about their cultural values and experiences with peers, they found that children from authoritarian homes were more likely to have experienced bullying -- both as victims and perpetrators . Dekovic and Jannsens (1992; 1997); Karreman et al (2006); Piotrowski et al (2013) have suggested in their studies that children with authoritarian parents are actually less advanced when it comes to self-regulation and moral reasoning Trinker et al (2012). Conducted a group of researchers on American middle and high school for over 18 months, they found that kids who identified their parents as more authoritarian were more likely to reject their parents as legitimate authority