Strengths And Weaknesses Of Bullying

1007 Words5 Pages

The second difference is Yang and Salmivalli (2013) focused on the background of how people can be bully, can be victims and bully victims. While Bowers, Smith & Binney (1994) focused on specific situation and the forms of bully that bullies most likely to use in school and what is the reason for bully- victims to be highly maladjasted more than pure bullies and pure victims. The other differences is that the effects of doing the form research were small (Bowers et al., 1994). On the other hand, from doing a family research (Yang & Salmivalli, 2013) it links to other area such as family system, involvement with others and also parenting style. Which can leads to other research that could be useful in the future. Strengths The strengths of Bully- Victims (Yang & Salmivalli, 1994) research is firstly, the sample is large. It means that the sample represent the population, so the sample could be generalized. Even though large sample might be complicated and takes too long, but the result most likely to be realistic. The second strength is that the researcher used self and peer reports to identify the subgroups, which can reduce the biasness. So the test most likely to be reliable and valid (Yang & Salmivalli, 1994). The strength of Family is that the test is specific. The four measurement focus on the different area that the researcher interested in. The results of this study is more accurate (Bowers et al., 1994). Weaknesses The weakness is that the sample is too

More about Strengths And Weaknesses Of Bullying

Open Document