Strengths Of Comparative Politics

Comparative politics is an essential part in learning and understanding the root of politics. Comparative politics purpose is to classify, understand, dissect a foreign societies, ideologies, political systems in other countries. One can say that comparative politics is a studying method that of macro social of the political phenomena. Comparative politics draws attention to similarities and differences of other types pf political system in countries that democracy would not succeed. Comparativtist study the key factors of country and what shapes their political ideologies, First, the state the primary power in which has the authority to control the citizens through either military, or a law of the land. Second, the economy,which is the agreements

Weakness: They draw attention to the importance of institutions but they do not suggest as the only (proof that one thing definitely causes another) force in politics; other factors play a role such as (how money affects people 's lives) development and diffusion of ideas. Some of the weaknesses of this approach is that it does not incorporate some parts of individual decision making to its analysis. Some of the strengths of this approach include its focus on the effect of political struggle on institutional results and how institutional results then affect political struggles. This approach should be more useful to the analysis of institutional development and policy making clear and sensible choice assume that people have a fixed set of preferences and they behave in manner that (makes as big as possible) the accomplishment of these preferences. One of the(like nothing else in the world) ideas (you think are true) of clear and sensible choice see politics as a series of total (of everything or everyone) action problems. People are restriction to take actions without institutional arrangements that (showy way of standing/mental attitude) (promises that something will definitely happen or that something will definitely work as described) (completing/matching) behavior of other people. Some of the weaknesses of the clear and sensible choice include: (a)clear and sensible choice are unable to provide a (good) enough(describe a possible future event) explanation of action since it does not specifies how preferences come about and why they differ from individual to individual; people-based argue that the clear and sensible choice view that people create institutions in order to further their goals is wrong because people cannot choose from institutions and rules; (c) clear and sensible choice ignores social structure. The clear and sensible choice approach should be more useful for the analysis of interactions between organizations and