1) The Fourteenth Amendment was ratified in 1868. The Fourteen Amendment made all persons which are born or naturalized in the U.S. citizens, it includes former slaves. It also states that all citizens of the United States have the right to due process and equal protection of law a, without the discrimination in terms of race or any other reason.
2) The different constitutional standards have been developed by The U.S. Supreme Court to assess the validity of changes based on Due Process & Equal Protection. The Due Process includes the rights of “life, liberty and property”, it is about each citizen. However, the Equal Protection Clause includes protecting a specific group from discrimination. If the problem is about the Fundamental Rights of people, The Strict Scrutiny, the standard is used to weigh the government 's interest against a constitutional right or principle, is used but if it is about the Ordinary Rights of people, the Rational Basis Test, which requires the government to show only the action is rationally related to a legitimate government interest,
…show more content…
If the plaintiff shares characteristics of a group and this group is a discrete and insular minority; with an immutable characteristic; and a history of suffering discrimination, to prevent the discrimination the Strict Scrutiny is used by the Court. The Strict Scrutiny test ask whether the federal or state government has a compelling interest in treating the class differently, and the law has been narrowly tailored to achieve that interest without unfairly intruding on the rights of the members of the suspect class. The reason why the most strength standard of judicial review is used in here is since the beginning of the history of the U.S. race, nationality, ethnicity and religion are the areas which most people are discriminated because of being different from the
As noted in Document 1, the 14th Amendment explicitly affirmed: “…All persons born or naturalized in the United State, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws…” The 14th Amendment ------------ (lead into the 15th amendment) 15th Amendment: The Fifteenth Amendment granted all male citizens, regardless of “race, color, or previous condition of servitude” the right to vote.
They all held a presumptive stance against laws that impose a discriminatory burden on the implied freedom. However, the question must be asked: when is a law said to discriminate in the context of the implied freedom? The caps on political contributions under the EFED challenged in McCloy should seemingly constitute discrimination as the caps had different maximums for different groups of people (s95A(1)), and hence had proportionately different impacts on them, but was ruled otherwise. Another implication within the judgment extended to why laws that discriminate in the sense of providing for differential treatment be presumptively illegitimate?
In Congress, the 13th amendment was passed by the Senate in 1864, and by the House of Representatives on 1865. The 14th amendment states that anyone born in the United States is considered a citizen and
Rosenberg puts forth two views of how the Supreme Court's achieves the effects it does: the "Dynamic Court" and the "Constrained Court". The Dynamic Court view maintains that the United States Supreme Court is indeed capable of effecting widespread change. The Constrained Court view holds that unless certain constraints and conditions imposed upon the Court by the Constitution, the Congress, the public, and other factors are overcome, the Court is unable to accomplish significant change. Rosenberg supports his claims by analyzing specific court decisions, namely Brown v. Board of Education (1954) and Roe v. Wade (1973). Rosenberg condenses three constraints he sees on judicial efficacy that are built into the American legal system: the limited nature of constitutional rights, the lack of judicial independence, and the judiciary’s limited enforcement powers (Rosenberg 2008, pg.
The 14th Amendment and the 15th Amendment were soon to follow, which protected former slaves under the law and granted African Americans the right to vote. With the Freedmen’s Bureau and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, the government was also able to support freed African Americans in finding new jobs, pursuing educations, and more in order to help them succeed.
The 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects any person within their jurisdiction of their due process and equal protection. The Equal Protection Clause under the 14th Amendment requires the states to apply their laws equally to any person within their jurisdiction. The equal protection clause aims to provide equal application of the law. It is also crucial to the protection of civil rights. There should be no discrimination in its application.
The 14th amendment gave African Americans the right to become citizens. Prior to the 14th amendment African Americans could not become citizens therefore their rights were limited. This amendment allows all that are born in the U.S. to become citizens and made the law permanent. Later that same right was rendered to the children of immigrants.
As was previously stated, the Fourteenth Amendment helps protect individual citizens. The amandment clearly reads “...nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”. This means every last citizen, no matter who they are or where they come from, receives equal protection under the law. One example of this is the case of Mapp v. Ohio, which was over the Fourth Amendment, aka. unlawful search and seizure.
The thirteenth amendment banned slavery for black Americans. Although this amendment made slavery illegal, there were still many obstacles that freedmen needed to overcome in order to be free in select states. The fourteenth amendment granted citizenship to all born in the United States and guaranteed equal protection, including formerly enslaved people. This repealed the black codes. The fifteenth amendment gave the right for black men to vote.
The Constitution and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms are composed of broad values like equality and liberty, but judges who attempt to give concrete meaning to such general concepts without specific precedent and law from the text or history overstep their proper role. If Robert H. Bork were to review judicial process today, he will assume all judges decide constitutional cases in accordance with “neutral principles.” In his article “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems” (1971), Bork insists these principles must be strictly neutral in origin of the text and from such cases that derive from precedent. He continues his argument by stating if the Court strikes down legislation on any other basis, it abuses its power and invades
The 13th amendment enforces the ban on slavery. The 14th amendment gave Congress authority to enforce the amendment’s prohibition on a state’s denial of equal protection of the laws. Also established the citizenship birthright meaning anyone born in the United States is automatically a citizen. There is also no denying the person in the United States life, liberty, or property without due process. The 15th amendment gave Congress authority to enforce the amendment’s ban on discrimination by race,
Women’s Rights and The Constitution At the mark of the Seneca Falls Convention’s 75th anniversary, 1923, Alice Paul drafted the Equal Rights Amendment (ERA) that called for a constitutional amendment that specifies equal rights of citizenship for women. The ERA, however, took half of a century to be passed by Congress for ratification, and this passage to the state legislatures is reflective of the period’s strengthened political demands of the women’s movement. Inspired by the concurrent Civil Rights Movement, sparked and moved by Betty Friedan’s The Feminine Mystique and the National Organization for Women (NOW), and rendered by the real economic and political advancement of American women, the ERA was able to launch a serious nationwide discussion for itself in 1972.
The Fourteenth Amendment (Amendment XIV) The amendments were put into place to protect the rights and civil liberties of all American citizens from the federal government. However, prior to the fourteenth amendment, there was no certainty with the constitution. The constitution did not state in a clear enough way who was protected under it and exactly what rights you had as an American Citizen. The 14th amendment was in response to the just passed thirteenth amendment, which ended slavery in all of the southern states.
No Matter the Price; Discrimination Shapes America Discrimination occurs within a variety of ethnic groups, gender, and even religion. One of the most unrecognizing types of discrimination is shared between bankruptcy and prosperous people. Discrimination is part of America as troublesome as it may be. However, it is what sets the standards within cultures, employment facilities, and even families. First hand experiences show how extremely intrusive people will be to each other.
However, each section also has established case precedence that assists in determining constitutionality. Cases that can be associated with the law are: Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942), Brandenburg v. Ohio (1968), Cohen v. California (1971), and Virginia v. Black (2003). Further, specifically regarding section (a), Cohen v. California (1971) is extremely important. Analysis of Enacted