Stricter Gun Control Laws Benefit America

Good Essays
Would Stricter Gun Control Laws Benefit America? The highly debatable question has flooded the minds of Americans. It is continued to be argued throughout America. The Second Amendment of the Constitution of the United States clearly states: “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed.” Obama’s effort to enforce this amendment may leave America in a frantic position. Stricter gun laws would not benefit America because they would restrict the rights of citizens, restrict the reliability and freedom citizens deserve, and would do nothing to prevent killings from occurring. Recently, laws have been established within states that mistreat…show more content…
This has caused gun manufacturers to become more climate friendly in which they are losing income from taxes as well as losing jobs. Kahr, from Rockland County, New York was complying with its S.A.F.E. Act. It had been broadcasted that it was transferring its procedures to a gun safe environment, which is Pennsylvania. Before the S.A.F.E. Act, Kahr had planned to construct a facility to host 80 to 100 jobs. As Kahr was asked how he felt about the move, he responded, “We don’t feel welcome.” In reaction to these anti-gun laws, several gun manufacturer companies, such as Sturm, Ruger & Company, and Beretta have chosen to move to a gun-safe state in order to reestablish. During the process, many different states were trying to recommend themselves by trying to persuade the companies. Mark Malkowski, the CEO of Stag Arms, mentioned that he had gotten “about one hundred offers” about repositioning. It is not shocking to see that gun control laws don’t recognize the impact they have on businesses and people. These laws seem to care more about taking away the rights of Americans than protecting their jobs. Luckily, our federalist system…show more content…
The effort to pass a law to do something about stopping crime has failed. Background checks can be easily passed and not affect this whatsoever. This story can briefly reinstate this. Wade Michael Page murdered at a temple located in Wisconsin. Page happened to be a veteran in the Army, was legally able to purchase weapons and passed a background check without any problems. Page was monitored through this sale and in this case, there are two options. He either followed the law or broke it. The question to ask is, what progress is passing a law if it does nothing to solve the problem one is trying to solve? It cripples the minds of some to hear this but the answer is none at all. It is a shame that legislatures would continue to pass such a law that achieves
Get Access