In this letter, I hoping to deliver additional ideas to the way Pacific University provides aid towards its student athletes. This composition is addressed to the Athletic Department Director and Board, who take care of athletic operations, and do so within the parameters of NCAA rules and regulations. With roughly about 30% of the student population at Pacific University participating in NCAA athletics, it is necessary that they are taken care of both on and off the field/court. Overall, Pacific University does a tremendous job at accommodating its student athletes, but the nudges provided in this composition will dispose of the little inconveniences that they still run into. It is understood that students athletes should take responsibility …show more content…
Legal measures have been taken to evaluate the justice of the benefits, obligations, and regulations that colleges and their athletes are to abide by. The issue has been addressed publically at the Division I athletic level, but the Division II and III issues are not addressed with the same earnestness. Being a Division III school, our athletes are exposed to the same struggles that athletes in the other divisions encounter, but are not compensated as much for their efforts as the upper divisions. Roughly the same period of time and effort is expended, but with little return on their investment because the NCAA prohibits any number of athletic scholarships from being given at the Division III …show more content…
Due to the different sports having to share the use of the athletic facilities, practice times are diverse week to week, which leads to students having to adjust their eating, study, and social times. When athletes are released from practice and the dining hall is closed, the very useful alternative option is to purchase food from “The Pod” or Starbucks. What could help our student athletes stay in top physical shape and mental shape is offering healthier, energizing food choices at “The Pod” and/or Starbucks. They offer food choices that may not satiate an athletes dietary requirements, resulting in decreased academic and athletic performances. Offering better protein, grain, fruit, vegetable, and dairy products can develop good dietary regime for athletes to follow and encourage even more favorable personal health
Athletes Must Have a Special Diet In each sport, there are many requirements to achieve maximum performance. One of the most important aspects in the athlete’s life is diet, which can negatively impact or positively an athlete’s performance. It is very difficult for a college athlete to have a good diet, especially when athletes eat in the cafeteria and travel a lot. Everyday athletes have to make choices about their alimentation.
Frank Deford has numerous opinionated claims in his article; however, he lacks organization, proof to his claims, and a professional tone. Deford first reminds the audience of the speech he gave in the past about collegiate athletes being the only students to receive genuine scholarships. Next, He explains Brand’s stance on the issue. Brand
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
For a century the National Collegiate Athletic Association has been around governing the organization for millions of college athlete. In the recent year, though, many people have been asking whether or not college athletes should be paid to play their sports in college, in particular, Division One male football and basketball players. The Paying of college athletes concept is in its resolution and plan, however the history of this issue dates back two decades and has proven both ineffective and discriminatory. The negative inherency of this new potential solution would far outweigh any minute advantages that the opposition will attempt to present as a positive change.
Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.
There has been a big controversy from years ago about whether or not NCAA students athletes should be paid a salary. This issue is important because so many people believe that these college athletes are already being paid through the scholarships they receive for their studies. However, others argue that they are not been given enough for all their sacrifices and hard work while playing in the field. There are countless reasons why it is fair for students athletes in college to obtain at least a minimum payment, and some of them are because colleges are producing lots of money with students playing sports, body injuries can dramatically risk athletes’ scholarships, and finally because they deserve to receive something back from having their
These students lead to believe that they will be compensated for their abilities with a quality education that will be paid for with scholarship funds. Instead they often find that they participate in a minimal academic program to allow for excessive hours of practice and travel for sports participation. While scholarships may cover the majority of the scholastic financial burden they do not account for the cost of living for an unemployed student athlete. The National Collegiate Athletic Association profits millions of dollars off the skills of it’s players and until recently was not required to share any of this monetary gain with these students. Careful consideration should be given to rulings prohibiting student athletes from receiving financial reimbursement for collegiate play.
Redick, a former star college basketball player for Duke University and current NBA player for the Los Angeles Clippers, have all strongly aligned themselves in favor of paying student-athletes what they need and what is deserved. Critics worry about losing the integrity of the game and some say the scholarship is enough for the athletes. However, there is an opportunity to solve this debate by opening up a free-market for all athletes and schools. I am arguing that there should be an open and free market for student-athletes and if schools need to pay more than a scholarship to get them to attend, then the players should be able to sign the deals and get paid. Overall, student-athletes should have the opportunity to be compensated for their skill, time, and talent, because those reasons can all lead to an excess of profits for
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
In today’s era, college athletes receive no compensation for their extremely high levels of play. These athletes have been playing their respective sports for many,
Horace Michell in his article, “Students Are Not Professional Athletes,” and Dave Zirin in her article, “An Economist Explains Why College Athletes Should Be Paid.",” offers differing views on why student athletes should and or shouldn’t be paid. Horace States that College Athletes are not proficient competitors who are paid pay rates and motivating forces for a profession in games. They are students getting access to a school instruction through their cooperation in games, for which they procure grants to pay educational cost, charges, food and lodging, and other permissible costs. University games are not a vocation or calling. It is the understudies' vehicle to an advanced education degree.
How many of you play a sport? How many of you are interested in playing a sport in college? If so, you can probably relate to this topic. Today I will be talking about a conflict that comes up in college athletic scholarships. Many people wonder if colleges should honor an athletic scholarship for the entire term of the athlete’s enrollment.
More than four hundred and sixty thousand students are working for free. According to the NCAA the number of student-athletes is steadily growing. These students represent their school when they compete in their respective sport. Although all NCAA student-athletes should be paid, the football and basketball programs bring in the most revenue therefore these two sports will be the main focus of this argument. In addition, not only do these particular student athletes bring in revenue for their school, but they also bring in revenue for shoe companies, shoe companies and the conference in which their team is in (Meshefejian).
The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.
The fight for payment of college athletes has not been quick one as more and more issues keep popping up. The NCAA has never allowed payment of its athletes, but small steps towards the overall goal has questioned the NCAA’s past. Its’ decisions has stayed constant since its founding in 1906. The first issue in this decision would not occur until 1952 when the NCAA ruled to give The University of Kentucky the ‘death penalty’ for paying their athletes. This ‘death penalty’ is a one year program ban from participation, the harshest penalty the NCAA can give.