To what extent did the student involvement fuel the anti-war protests?
The 1960's had become one of the most turbulent times in the United States. Students shook the innocence and seriousness of the 1950's to become active members of society. It was a time of change where students took an active role in the peace movements and their involvement fueled the anti-war protests.
The Cold War was at its peak in the 1960’s. People were afraid because the USA and the USSR were engaged in the arms race, both of these superpowers possessed nuclear weapons, the USA had sent troops to Vietnam and the conflict in the Middle East was a constant threat to world peace. Peace movements were established because of the uncertainty and conflict during the 1960’s.
…show more content…
This was a time where young people from middle class backgrounds were able to go to university or college once they had finished school. College enrollment reached nine million students by the end of the 1960’s. Colleges and universities in America had more students than before, and these institutions often tried to restrict student behaviour to maintain order on the campuses. The students chose to embrace the rebellious mood of the ‘Swinging Sixties’ instead of following the adult standards of hard work and nonaggressive behaviour. They challenged their parent’s values by rejecting the accepted norms of society. They were known as ‘hippies’ and rebelled against the standards set by their parents. They wore kaftans, long skirts, bell-bottom jeans, bead and sandals. Boys grew their hair long, which was also a form of protesting. Another form of protesting was where other young people experimented with drugs like LSD. The hippies believed in communal living and sexual freedom. They listened to Rock music performed by artists such as the Beatles, Bob Dylan and the Rolling Stones. The lyrics of the songs performed by these musicians reflected the hippies’ rejection of conventional values. They were committed to peace and love. Hippies believed that flowers symbolized peace and called themselves ‘flower children.’ A feature of the opposition movement was the fact that it was a popular social event. As one student said, antiwar demonstrations were the places to "get laid, get high, and listen to some great
Not to mention, “not only has music been a direct means of anti-war protest, but the culture of peace and love, seen especially in the Woodstock festival, has also pervaded the minds of the public” (Hopkins). The controversial Vietnam War affected many people in the United States, but the war caused a socio cultural revolution through the power of
Without students in organizations like SNCC and CORE, sit-ins and issues such as voting rights would not have been at the forefront of this movement. Although student activism is highly regarded now, Cobb recalls the perspectives of adults in 1960’s when he says, “We were under a lot of pressure as an organization, say, as SNCC, because a lot of people thought we were too radical.” As an organization run by student they were extremely successful which made some individuals feel threatened. In his book, Cobb highlights the fact that in 1960 Amzie Moore was the first adult civil rights leader to embrace SNCC. Overall, the generational rift between the “children” of the sixties and older generations was another important part of Cobb’s story as well as many college aged students in the
Why Can’t We Be Friends?: The Rise of Tension between the US and USSR post-WWII Dating back to at least the start of communism, the world saw the gradual rise of the Cold War between the United States of America (USA) and the United Soviet Socialist Republic (USSR). Although the Cold War was may have been inevitable because of these countries differing visions of economic policy, governmental systems, and the postwar world in general, it was during the years 1941-1949 when it became imminent. In this time, suspicion and tension between the Superpowers increased due to the battle between communism and capitalism, as well as their different governmental systems.
Education was starting to fall apart because of the war and focusing more on Sciences. Before the Cold War men would volunteer to join the war and was able to decide if they wanted to risk their life of not, because the War got so serious they forced boys that turned 18 to join the war. Between 1953 and 1962 the Gallup Poll results proved the ongoing pattern of the United States going to war and also wanting peace. If America wasn't fighting in the war they were trying to keep peace and prevent the
The 1950s gave rise to strict social norms, the civil rights movement, the Beat generation and McCarthyism. The 1950s and the 1960s were more prosperous for some more than others. With the economy booming people were more inclined to buy more goods.(Doc C) The Black community was barred from the same opportunities as white people. While whites moved into the suburbs blacks moved to the inner cities.(Doc B)
According to my research, students back in the 1960s played a critical role in developing the Savannah State College; into what is now known as the illustrious Savannah State University. Students from the 1960s dealt with the hardship of going to school, while the civil rights movement was active. Due to the fact of the civil rights movement being in act, it brought various problems into the school system. On the other hand, it strengthens the students and united them.
However, at the conclusion of both interviews, the students stated that by the end of 1968, the administration had granted the students more freedoms. Even with the newfound freedoms, the School of the Ozarks students still felt uninvolved and not important. So, why did this specific youth population, filled with complaints, not come together and protest like the student bodies has various other institutions at done in 1968? The answer to the students’ obedience and adherence to rules stemmed from the values the school instilled in students.
“J.F.K., Civil Rights, and the Cold War.” This was how one of my friends responded when I asked her what she thought of when I said, ‘the 1960s’. Indeed, all of these coincided in a time of great social and political turmoil in the United States, and also around the world. Although each is significant, the civil rights movement spearheaded much of the change during this decade and during those to come. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. serves as one of the hallmarks of the civil rights movement that followed the corruption and segregation that was still commonplace in white, Southern Baptist America.
The sixties was a decade unlike any other. Baby boomers came of age and entered colleges in huge numbers. The Civil Rights movement was gaining speed and many became involved in political activism. By the mid 1960s, some of American youth took a turn in a “far out” direction. It would be the most influential youth movement of any decade - a decade striking a dramatic gap between the youth and the generation before them.
Youth enjoyed the aspect of ‘independence’. They did this by starting a wave of strikes in 1965 effecting almost every university and college. They were going around demanding more in their education and elimination of rules and restriction imposed on them. 500 million youth turned up to join forces in peace, use marijuana and listen to the artists such as Jimi Hendrix and Janis Joplin who idolised the use of drugs, sex and opposition to the Vietnam War. Youth movement was strong as they were all willing to cross the government, however the youth movement began to fade following a series of violent crackdowns on protesters which involved several deaths and many injuries.
The Cold War was a “hybrid” war between the United States and the Soviet Union that started right after the end of World War II in 1947 (Two Super…). Both countries had strong political tensions toward each other. During the Cold War, although the two countries did not battle each other militarily, as a result of all the escalating tensions, the threat of an outright war made all parties nervous. The two countries, along with each other’s allies, differed in their opinions on postwar arrangements, with the Soviets backing out of their promise in the Yalta agreement, they were more interested in the spread of communism in the post WWII era.
Many conservatives also considered hippies to be a drain on society and only a group of rebels. However, some that were able to witness Woodstock or got to help with the event in some way changed their opinion of hippies. Lawrence Dessner (1971) asserted that Woodstock was a peaceful event (p. 769). People were free to be and do as they please and nothing else mattered. The festival was a celebration of the morals hippies had.
This specific group of people believed in love, peace, and freedom. “Displaying frank new attitudes about drugs and sex, communal lifestyles, and innovations in food, fashion, and music, the counterculture youth of America broke profoundly with almost all values their parents held dear”(FLOWER POWER). For example, hippies experimented in several sexual partners, including those of the same sex. They also did not hold their sexual relations to one specific number, but rather a surplus of a diverse
David Farber is the author or editor of three additional books on the 1960s and both David Farber and Beth Bailey are professors of American history at the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, which suggests that the authors are well-acquainted and knowledgeable on the topic of post-Sputnik American education. It is important to note that because of the date of publication, 2001, Farber and Bailey’s book is a secondary source; which indicates that it offers different perspective, analysis, and conclusion on the 1960s. However, because it is a book published in 2001, is it unknown whether or not the authors had first-hand experience with the topics they were writing about—which could affect their particular school of thought or
Many individuals/Scholars tend to characterize the 1950s as a time of conformity, prosperity, & solidarity. While the 1960s was viewed as the decade of pandemonium, chaos & rebellion. These descriptions of both decades may be accurate. But many argue that there is a correlation between the two periods.