Examination of Foundationalism: As I have mentioned in the introduction that foundationalism is a so influential theory of justification that all other competing theories of justification are described in terms of their relation to or divergence from it. That feature makes it a common target of all other relevant theories. Thus, a number of criticisms are made against it. In this paper I will examine five of them which I take to be the most common criticisms against foundationalism. These are: 1.
However, with symptomatic reading, the critic must take into account the issues in society, whether it be pollution, slavery or even women’s rights. Surface reading can be viewed as a more scholarly method of criticism (Williams Jeffrey,) due to the fact it allows readers to understand more about the cultural aspect of literature. By analysing literary techniques, such as allusions, alliteration, onomatopoeia and so on, the critic can become emerged in history, simply by observing the form of a text. On the other hand, symptomatic reading forces the critic to act as a detective (Williams Jeffrey.) They must broaden their understanding of
The Reluctant Fundamentalist Argumentative Paper The Reluctant Fundamentalist is a novel that looks into the life of Changez, a young Pakistani man, that came to the United States to receive a college education from Princeton University. Changez later lives in New York City and has a very well paid job at a business evaluation firm. With the terrorist attacks of 9/11, Changez goes through many physical and emotional hardships before eventually returning to his home country. Throughout this novel, there was really one argument that continued to catch my attention: can you be two people at one time? During the novel, Changez argues his Pakistani side with his American side.
“The Reluctant Fundamentalist” is written by Mohsin Hamid, and is about a Pakistani man, Changez, who dreams about working in America. Changez, the main character, invites an American man into a restaurant and begins telling him his story from 1997 up until around 2003. He tells him about how he went to Princeton University and got a good job in a valuation firm in New York, and how he met a woman named Erica on a holiday, and fell in love with her. It has been his dream since he was a child to work for the US, and so he feels happy with himself and his life. Although he is not American himself, no one spares him an extra look and he is accepted in the country for being who he is.
In The Reluctant Fundamentalist, Changez is neither here nor there. He is not part of the fundamental Islamic community. His dreams are desired are very different that from others in the society. He dreams of going to America and fulfilling his desires of wealth, power, and knowledge. Being that his dreams are, they are misunderstood and ridiculed by others.
Rhetorical analysis is an investigation into how someone uses his/her critical reading skills to analyze text. The objective of the rhetorical analysis is the study of how the author writes, instead of what the author wrote. At that point, we need to examine the method that the author uses to attain his goal. According to Jonah G. Willihnganz “A rhetorical analysis is an examination of how a text persuades us of its point of view. It focuses on identifying and investigating the way a text communicates, what strategies it employs to connect to an audience, frame an issue, establish its stakes, make a particular claim, support it, and persuade the audience to accept the claim”.
“The Reluctant Fundamentalist” is written by Mohsin Hamid, and is about a Pakistani man, Changez, who dreams about working in America. Changez, the main character, invites an American man into a restaurant and begins telling him his story from 1997 up until around 2003. He tells him about how he went to Princeton University and got a good job in a valuation firm in New York, and how he met a woman named Erica on a holiday and fell in love with her. It has been his dream since he was a child to work for the US, and so he feels content with himself and his life. Although he is not American himself, no one spares him an extra look and he is accepted in the country for being who he is.
This being the case, Five Views on Biblical Inerrancy is a book on the doctrine of inerrancy where five Christian scholars, R. Albert Mohler Jr., Peter Enns, Michael F. Bird, Kevin J. Vanhoozer, and John R. Franke discuss their various perspectives on biblical inerrancy, narrowing the focus on four significant issues – (1) God and his relationship to his creatures, (2) the doctrine of inspiration, (3) the nature of scripture, and (4) the nature of truth (Merrick & Garrett, 2013, p. 22). SUMMARY For the interest of this paper, I chose the first chapter titled “When the Bible speaks, God speaks: The Classic Doctrine of Biblical Inerrancy” (Mohler, 2013, p. 29) by R. Albert Mohler Jr. who asserts that the evangelical faith would become indistinct without the doctrine of inerrancy and thus crucial. Mohler is basically quite straightforward and outspoken about his position that “there is little basis for any hope that evangelicals will remain
I. Introduction Stylistics is one of the eminent branches of linguistics. It is a linguistic approach that closes to literary criticism. In addition, stylistics involves both linguistic and literary studies. In the last few years, there has been growing interest in Stylistics as it has been gaining its importance and becoming most frequently used.
This style is characterized by coherent and logical syntactical structure, with an expanded system of connectives and careful paragraphing. Its emotional appeal is achieved by the use of words with the emotive meaning. Publicistic style is also characterized by the brevity of expression, sometimes it becomes a leading