The problems in a modern college town are plentiful, but perhaps none identify and affect as many residents as the issue of substance abuse. Tempe, Arizona is one of the largest college towns in the country, making the spread of illicit drugs among students and residents a “substantial” issue. The rampant use of mind-altering substances has extremely detrimental effects on both the users’ brains and the community in which they live in. This fact is nothing new, and has been noted by the government on both state and federal levels, and precautions have been taken accordingly. Granting this, these precautions tend to create only further problems for both the users of the drug and the community; landing young adults with criminal records, while …show more content…
The issue at hand is universal, but remains prominent specifically in Tempe, Arizona, with synthetic drugs and opiates trickling into the Arizona State University campus and the surrounding metro alike, causing family issues, drug related crimes, as well as contributing to the increasing the rate at which students drop out of college. This large college-town has its fair share of problems, though few as detrimental as drug abuse, and the current methods of combating it seem to raise more problems than solutions. The issue at hand is how to minimize community risk while still treating those who abuse illicit substances and offer an alternative to the current habits of living. The drug problem in Tempe is increasingly rampant and especially severe due to the large amount of student residents, and legislature must be passed to improve these …show more content…
The problem is real, but so is the ability to change it, and obviously the methods already in place are not alleviating the issue as it is. It is easy to just say pour resources into the police force and perpetuate the war on drugs, but this only causes more tragedy through the incarceration of citizens and the other detrimental effects that drugs have on the community. Those that create laws are those that have the power to enact such a bill, and it is in the best interest of everyone that resides in Tempe. It doesn’t have to be a tragedy, as it should not be, so make it a progressive change for the sake of those living in the
Overview: The purpose of the Executive Summary, The Multi-Site Adult Drug Court Evaluation: Executive Summary (Rossman, Roman, Zweig, Rempel, Lindquist, 2011), was to show how Urban Institute’s Justice Policy Center (UI-JCP), RTI International (RTI) and Center for Court Innovation (CCI) conducted research on how drug courts impact the overall crimes related to drugs. The main issue being explored is how well the drug courts are doing to help lower crime revolving around the drug epidemic. This issue is significant to criminal justice because it shows that the United States has a serious drug dilemma that started in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s that has to be combated by government and law enforcement agencies. This includes the issue you of whether or not drug courts are actually helping reduce crime.
In 1989, officials in Miami-Dade County, Florida established the nation’s first drug court. This special court was designed to bring drug treatment more fully into the criminal justice system, treating offenders with a history of drug abuse for their addiction, while simultaneously ensuring supervision, and sanctions when needed, from the courts. The movement for an alternative court to sentence drug offenders emerged from the rapidly evolving reality that the nation’s decision to address drug abuse through law enforcement mechanisms would continue to pose significant challenges for the criminal court system. In 2004, 53% of persons in state prison were identified with a drug dependence or abuse problem, but only 15% were receiving professional
The prohibition of intoxicating beverages was one of the least successful experiments in American social and criminal history, but in spite of its obvious failure in the 1920s, the American experiment in prohibition is still being continued today. For decades, our leaders have been telling us that America is in the middle of a drug epidemic, and the trade in illicit drugs has certainly created a criminal industry that is incredibly profitable and extremely violent. Until recently, however, few respectable political or law enforcement officials have been willing to consider the possibility of legalization. The moral, medical and social disgrace attached to illegal drug use was simply too great. In recent years, however, as the crisis has escalated
Prevention is key in order to maintain a successful outlook for these former inmates that are slowly but surely readjusting back to society. In the book “Community & Public Health”, the four basic elements of prevention include, “(1) education, (2) treatment, (3) public policy, (4) enforcement. The goals of education and treatment are the same: to reduce the demand for drugs. Likewise, setting effective public policy and law enforcement share the same goal: to reduce the supply and availability of drugs in the community.” (McKenzie 2012).
In the 1970s the United States entered the era known as mass incarceration, the byproduct of the drug war. The War on Drugs changed how society handled drug dependency, diverting the problem from public health to criminal justice. Since the Nixon administration, the political stance on being tough on crime has resulted in various laws and policing practices that heavily criminalized drugs to point in which the prison population in the United States increased from 300,000 people in 1972 to 2.3 million today (Barish, DuVernay, Averick & DuVernay, 2016). The epidemic of mass incarceration corresponds to a variety of public health issues such as mental illness, increased violence within society, increased incidence of addictions, and increased incidence of chronic illnesses (Drucker, 2013).
Some areas in the United States face higher rates of crime and drug abuse. This contributes to the prevalence of health disparities within different communities. In order to eliminate or decrease the distinct difference between areas that are at higher health risks than others one must begin to understand why they exist. Some areas have higher drug abuse rates than others due to factors such as poor education, poverty, unemployment rates, and lack of community involvement. These things play a major role in whether or not a young adult is going to start the use of drugs or drinking alcohol.
The legalization of drugs has been at the center of interminable debate. Drugs have widely been perceived as a dominant threat to the moral fabric of society. Drug use has been attributed as the source responsible for a myriad of key issues. For instance, it is believed that drugs have exacerbated the already weak status of mental health in the United States in which some individuals suffering from mental illness administer illicit substances such as heroin or cocaine in an attempt to self-medicate. Moreover, drugs are blamed for turning auspicious members of the community into worthless degenerates.
When looking at a scholarly journal or other form of report pertaining to controlled substances, the theme is usually pretty clear; “drugs are bad, people that do drugs are bad, and it’s only getting worse.” Moore challenges this theme by breaking the mold in his article, “The Other Opioid Crisis” by implementing several rhetorical devices to add a more human aspect to the not so black-and-white issue. “The Other Opioid Crisis” is an article that goes into the ethics and the arguments regarding those who are in need of opioids and their stories, alongside other ethical issues they may face. By providing stories of patients, Moore states his opinion which is backed strongly by the pains, both mentally and physically, that opioid prescribed patients face. In these stories he not only provides a detailed account of their struggles, he uses strong language to appeal to the pathos of the reader on a subject that may not be easy for many to sympathize with.
Three thousand, three hundred teens start smoking marijuana every single day (The Recovery Village 1), and fifty six percent of them will continue to smoke after highschool (NIDA 1). Teenage marijuana abuse has became a horrendous issue for many schools in the United States and is becoming more acceptable within the teen community. Only twenty one percent of students think marijuana poses a great risk, which is only half of the students that thought marijuana was a risk twenty years ago (NIDA 1). Clearly, there is an issue of teenage drug abuse, which Rich Wallace, the author of One Good Punch, decided to write about. Wallace wrote a book with the underlying issue of the potential risk of drug possession and use within teens and presents it as an issue that can ruin your life.
The school’s policies and procedures in regards to illegal drug use on campus have not been updated since 1970, when there was a more relaxed perspective of drug use. In 1970, cocaine was perceived as being used by the wealthy and the users and dealers were a lot younger (Abadinsky, 2014). This school’s policies and procedures haven’t been revised since “crack” was created in 1980 (Abadinsky, 2014). A lot has changed since 1970 and with new and different drugs in existence the level of violence has increased (Abadinsky, 2014).
In his article, “Toward a Policy on Drugs,” Elliot Currie discusses “the magnitude and severity of our drug crisis” (para. 21), and how “no other country has anything resembling the American drug problem” (para. 21). The best way to describe America’s drug problem is that it is a hole continuously digs itself deeper. America’s drug issues were likely comparable to other country’s at one point in time, but today it can be blamed on the “street cultures” (para. 21) that continue to use and spread the use of illegal drugs. These street cultures transcend the common stereotype of drug users, such as low income communities in cities or welfare recipients, and can be found in every economic class and location. They are groups of people who have
This program could tackle both the education of the community as well as helping those addicted to opioids. The risk of not implementing any of these policy or strategies would far outweigh their cost. My recommendation for any Law Enforcement organization, is to implement all of these polices or strategies. But, implementing just one will directly affect the opioid overdose
Therefore, those continually exposed to drug use will begin to see this as the normative behavior, accepting and adopting it for themselves. There is a direct correlation between the amount of exposure and the prevalence of deviant behavior. The realization of this correlation is part of what is leading the push for changes in drug laws. People are beginning to realize that while confining a drug user to jail does punish the drug user, it also forces them to observe and socialize with other deviants, not just other drug users, thereby exposing them to new and perhaps worse deviant behaviors for them to assimilate.
Drug Addiction : Treatment or Punishment? When a person takes a drug the chemicals affect the brain by interfering with how the neurons send messages. According to the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the structure of Marijuana and Heroin mimic a natural neurotransmitter which tricks the receptors into allowing the drug to activate neurons inside the brain which interferes with messages and leads to abnormalities of behavior. With other drugs such as cocaine there is an abnormally large amount of neurotransmitters released which disrupts communication channels.
Drug testing is also another popular installment in a community. These drug tests are done in the workplace, at school and even random roadside stops (3). Additionally, special work forces like border control, therapist, and prohibition officers are all employed by communities and taxpayer money to deal with drug abuse (2)(6). The resources deployed on these workforces are avoidable and can be reduced simply if drug abuse did not happen in the first place and it is a reason why many government systems and communities are in debt and do not have access to more important things like hospitals and new technology .