Banning books will get students, schools, and libraries off the hook. Students can learn a lot of inappropriate stuff through certain books. Public libraries could get a lot of complains if they do not ban certain books from their library. Schools can get in deep trouble if they do not ban certain books from their school Banning certain books is good for multiple reasons. Certain books should be banned because they could be inappropriate for students.“Whatever goes upon two legs is an enemy” (Orwell 53).
Schools around the nation ban soda and candy from their campus while other schools allow their students to have candy and soda. Some schools say it’s too unhealthy for their students so they provide just the school food because it’s healthy and nutritious. Other schools do allow their students to drink soda and candy because their students often crave different things instead of just school food. Through my perspectives I say we should not ban soda and candy. I say we shouldn’t ban soda and candy because us students do crave it.
As a result of my study on gangs, I have discovered that the reasons people join gangs are because they have an addiction to drugs, have uncontrollable emotions, face experiences with failure and have unhealthy relationships. I agree with these causes of why people join gangs and also believe those causes can be prevented. By making good decisions, I believe people would not join a gang. Other people might say that becoming involved with gangs cannot be controlled due to family and ethnic cultures endorsing it, but this is unreasonable because of all the preventions to the causes. The addiction to drugs is a cause of joining gangs, because once a person gets hooked they will take any necessary means to receive these drugs.
Banned Books: Good or Bad? Should students be exposed to the real world through books or should they be shielded from it? There are many people who agree that banned books should be banned because it is ethical, and valid and it prevents students from emotional stress. On the other side of the argument, people argue that students have the right to read whatever they want. Many books are challenged and banned in schools because they contain inappropriate content or bad language; however, some people have a strong belief that these books are worth reading because they represent ideas of free speech and other important lessons that students will need throughout their lives On the pro side of the argument, there are many reasons why some people support banning books in schools.
Children and young people are becoming addicted to technology. I chose two articles regarding this topic. One is called “Banning Children from Technology is Counter-Productive", and "If We Don’t Want Our Children To Be Addicted To Technology, We Should Start Putting Down Our Phones”. The first article thinks that children shouldn’t be banned from technology, and it will be, well, counter-productive. The second article talks about how adults should limit their technology use if they want kids to not be addicted to technology.
Are school meals really that unhealthy? Why do so many people want healthier school lunches? Although many students don’t believe that the school lunches are unhealthy, schools should try to make every effort to increase the amount of healthy foods and to decrease the amount of junk food being sold because healthy foods are more nutritious and energy-rich so students can stay focused in class. In addition, much of the American population is obese and the rate of obesity is growing. And finally, junk food leads to other physical and emotional problems.
Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, why this book written by Mark Twain should be on the banned books list in schools and why it is too mature for it’s students. This book is full of situations that honesty students are not able to handle, leaving inappropriate impressions about racism and how to treat people and is going to cause teenagers and young adults to repeat the language and personalities seen in this, to other groups of this century that are fitting now The problem with Adventures of Huckleberry Finn isn’t that it is a bad book, not that maybe it is poorly written or isn’t a learning experience. The fact of the matter is that students do not hold the attention span or mental capacity to be forced to deal with this. While some may use to excuse that high school students may have enough knowledge over these situations, or if explained, people would enjoy the moral of the story more, that is not always the case. Students in high school already are expected so much of.
The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn Should be Banned From Schools In school are students supposed to learn about bad language and how to treat people poorly?The fiction novel, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, by Mark Twain should be removed from schools. Twain writes about serious topics as a satire so many people do not realize the intensity. The language, alcoholism, violence, lying, and breaking the law are a few reasons for this novel to be banned from schools. Mark Twain writes about many questionable subjects but does so as a satire which makes it slightly more acceptable. Huck has good morals and is very openminded.
Some parents, students, and school board members think books are constantly being banned in educational facilities and libraries because of their explicit content and profanity; however; many of those same books teach important life lessons and represent freedom of speech. Many people believe that banning a book is violating their 1st Amendment right of free speech because you cannot simply limit someone to what they should read. Marjane Satrapi's autobiographical book Persepolis talks about growing up in Tehran during the Islamic Revolution that has a lot of violence and harsh subjects throughout the book. Kelly Konrad, the Author of “Banning Books is Bad And Let Me Tell You My Top 5 Reasons Why..”, says that she was both impressed with the swift action of teachers and students to get the word out, and perplexed by what initiated the removal of the book Persepolis at Chicago Public Schools (Konrad). Many books just like this one that contains explicit subjects are
Some people believe books should not be banned in schools and libraries because taking away the First Amendment right, by banning books is not right. First, the freedom of speech and press is taken away when books are banned. To begin, “When librarians and teachers reject works that may be ‘emotionally inappropriate’ for children, they’re adhering to the traditional and mostly prevailing view that children’s literature should avoid controversial topics,” (Ringel). Keeping children from using their voice
Should Candy & Soda be Banned From School? J. Justin Wilson effectively uses rhetorical techniques in his short article, arguing about whether or not candy and soda should be banned from schools. Mr. Wilson was dominant in appealing to logic reason to support his argument. His ideology is that the government needn’t intervene in the lives of young adults by eliminating fat foods from school, paying particular attention on candy and soda. He states, “when faced with a problem as complicated as our nation 's childhood obesity epidemic, it 's easier to simply assign blame to sugary drinks and snacks, rather than tackling the various roots of the problem” (Wilson, para 5).
Although colleges should provide these seminars for students on alcohol, they should also crack down on its usage. By doing so, they deter the majority of students from drinking recklessly as well as deterring underage students from drinking. If the punishment for underage drinking on campus was expulsion, many students, if not all, would stop drinking as minors. By them creating these
To Kill a Mockingbird should not be banned in schools because students such as myself need to exposed to the themes that are in the novel because the novel’s themes have relevance in today’s society. There is a lot of coarse language in the book which has been a reason why some people want the book banned. Harper Lee’s treatment of these subjects (themes and language) for the most part was both realistic and respectful. The themes that are in To Kill a