Summary: A Genealogy Of Modern Racism

Imperialism, 1865-1900,” by Eric T. Love, talks about how race has moved, shaped, and inspired the late-nineteenth-century U.S. Imperialism. Love also mentions the racial ideologies rooted in white supremacy that gave expansionists a grand rational for empire . White Supremacy became an imperative piece of the imperial project. They believed the conviction that people of European descent were inherently different from those and more superior to those of Native Americans, Mexicans, African Americans, Asian, and even certain European groups (the new immigrants from southern and eastern regions) .

Much of the sociological literature focuses on white racism. Some of the earliest sociological works on racism were penned by sociologist W. E. B. Du Bois, the first African American to earn a doctoral degree from Harvard University. Du Bois wrote, "The problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the color line." Wellman defines racism as "culturally sanctioned beliefs, which, regardless of intentions involved, defend the advantages whites have because of the subordinated position of racial minorities".

Which within the constitution it stated that “all men are created equal”? Within the article, “Thomas Jefferson Racism”, it talks about the difference between black and white, how physical appearance is different, same goes for education, and life condition. Within the first to the second page, he talks about the physical appearance about black, how their skin is like scarf skin and hair are different from white. Jefferson said slave was basically like a domestic animal that was strong but treated like one. This was a clear insult to the slave because they were working like an animal, however, there were strong like one, but will you really treat a human this way.

Can it be explained, or reasoned in a way that makes sense to even the most ardent critics? For this project, I 'd like to find examples in every day American life that shows white privilege exists beyond a theory. The best way to start this research is with the author Tim Wise. In his books Colorblind, The Rise of Post Racial Politics and the Retreat from Racial Equality, Between Barrack and a Hard Place, and White Like Me: Reflections from a Privileged Son, Wise offers his analysis of white privilege and the politics of racism in America; with chapters entitled "White Denial and the Reality of Racism,” Wise offers an academic perspective that will assist me addressing the issue of white privilege in America. While Wise is an unpopular figure in many circles, he

Instead of using prejudice or stereotypes, where negative thoughts and attitudes are created and shared, she extends it to the level of discrimination and racism. Although instead of calling it racism, she uses “eyeism”, as she is discriminating on the basis of eye color rather than skin color. She calls all white men “boy”, she interrupts them when they are talking and she talks to them like she is superior. She uses the racism, prejudice, stereotypes and discrimination black individuals have experienced for hundreds of years and turns it around on the white

Charles Chesnutt tackles the concept of racial identity in the novel The House Behind the Cedars by using his characters to attack the myth of race as a biological concept. In the novel, characters like John Warwick and Rena perform whiteness by adopting the mentality of whites in their area. Their performance did not include just passing using their skin color, but it also included adopting an attitude of racial superiority towards their black counterparts. This racial superiority includes adopting the mentality that white blood is superior to black blood. After Warwick meets with his mother and sister secretly, the novel expounds on this mentality stating: Warwick .

The first section covers the period between 1870 and 1900 and details the creation of the myth of Appalachian whiteness. In this period regional reconciliation and nativist anxieties gave racial purity of the mountaineer new meaning. This section details how myths about Appalachia’s racial past, particular in regards to the absence of slavery, served to construct the region as racially pure and deserving of the uplift efforts of northern reformers. The second section examines the discourses that fashioned the mountaineer as possessing a tainted whiteness through an exploration of the popular discourses surrounding the “hillbilly” and the “tri-racial isolate.” These discussions were rooted in early twentieth century concerns over national health, race purity, and the nature of social change and isolation, By illustrating how the discourses on white and tri-racially mixed Appalachians aligned between 1900 and 1920, I hope to show how both helped to fashion the racial identity of the other. The final section examines the eugenic family studies taking place during this same period.

Lastly, the firth chapter, Normative `White' Femininity, elaborates on how white femininity is further disciplined by the patriarchal ideas of beauty, which create normative beauty standards which are racialized.Deliovsky book provides an incredible innovative theoretical contribution to the “white studies” literature in North America. The books title “White femininity, race, gender and power” already implies that the content presents an original and provocative context to the complex dimensions of “whiteness”

The Eurocentric views of whiteness being directly correlated to superiority and civilization was used a tool to exploit native peoples while legalizing entitlement to lands that have already been discovered (Miller, 2010, p.87). The process of land dispossession had a profound negative impact on Native peoples. Their identity became outlined by colonial institutions rather than from their own definition. The conflicting methods of defining identity is integral to Kauanui’s Hawaiian Blood: Colonialism and the Politics of Sovereignty and Indigeneity. In her work, she describes how indigenous Hawaiians themselves have historically determined their identity through genealogy and a system of common descent.

Conclusion I have done two case study’s looking into a symbol and identifying what it represented before and what it represents now, why it was targeted for manipulation and how it got manipulated in the public’s eye. For the Swastika, it’s been a symbol of light, knowledge, life, divinity and peace and an old link to the Indo-European elites, for this reason it was targeted by the German nationalists and monarchists to show how they, with the Aryan heritage, are superior. Propaganda was a major role in how they were able to manipulate the identity of the symbol. By adopting it as their signifier they were able to use it in repetition in their military uniforms, their propaganda posters, as a backdrop to their speeches and leaders affiliating