Migration is not a new concept in terms of Canadian history. In fact, Canada is primarily a nation of migrants. Canada as a country has a greater percentage of foreign born citizens in it’s population than both the United States of America and a majority of European countries (Reitz, 2014). The proportion of foreign born citizens in Canada is 0.8 of the total Canadian population (Reitz, Lecture 1). This is almost a full 1% of Canada’s total population. Due to the mass immigration to Canada the government has introduced new terminology in order to label certain individuals who do not fit into the perceived norm of being classified as either European or Caucasian. In order to classify these individuals, the term “Visible Minority” began to be commonly used in political jargon. Earlier uses of the term visible minority was used in office in the parliamentary report titled Equality now! The Report of the Special …show more content…
Without the term it would be more difficult to categorize the differences between Non-European immigrants in relation to European immigrants. Something of interest is the fact that non-European immigrants tend to have higher difficulties in finding work even though on average they tend to be more highly educated than their European immigrant counterparts (Kalbach,2000). It seems that priority in jobs are given to those who fit the stereotypical view of what is considered to be a “Canadian” even if they are. This is shown by the fact that the immigration process itself has been less selective in Greek and Portuguese immigrants than they have been of Chinese immigrants Kalbach,2000). Despite the fact that the points system is now what is used in order to pick immigrants and the non-racial policy has officially been in place since Ellen Fairclough the Progressive Conservative Immigration Minister changed the policy in 1962 (Reitz, Lecture
Reading Response 4: “Introduction: The Fabrication of Race” by Matthew Frye Jacobson Manvir Kaur July 10, 2017 History 17A: U.S History The term “race” is one of the major aspects of one’s identity which tends to completely change over time. The primary source, “Introduction: The Fabrication of Race,” is part of a book called “Whiteness of a Different Color: European Immigrants and the Alchemy of Race” which was written by Matthew Frye Jacobson in the twentieth century. In this source, he expands on the topic of “whiteness” with its relation to European immigrants in the United States and also, on the different perspectives of how other races are seen.
Everyday the future in America looks brighter for the issues dealing with race and identity. Brave souls are not letting racism, class discrimination, or sexism hold them back anymore. Furthermore, the fight for a balanced society that pushes for equality is on the horizon. As we close on an era, based on purely the skin of the person, we need to analyze the impacts of the Ethnicity paradigm and Class paradigm on politics of the 20th century. Race and Ethnicity are used interchangeable in everyday conversation, however; they are not the same.
Unlike in the past where immigrants from certain religions and cultures were associated
Canada is a nation known for the multicultural population. It is seen as an attractive destination for the great social policies adopted by the charismatic leaders the country was able to create. Since the 1800’s, Canada’s immigration laws were severely restricted to non-whites, nevertheless, the country has now evolved to encompass all ethnicities equally. Canada’s identity, especially since the 1950’s and onwards, experienced rapid growth and change. This can be seen through the following examples: Immigration, Pierre Trudeau and the F.L.Q crisis.
The text 1,360 ft3 by Wayde Compton suggests that only certain kinds of immigrants are welcome in Vancouver. The “Mystery Migrant” that arrives in Vancouver in a container from Hong Kong, is shown to be completely unwelcome. The public reacts to her presence negatively, sending in letters “depict[ing] her as some sort of terrorist or spy” (18). One letter suggests “she should be stuffed back in the container they found her in, locked up, and sent to Hong Kong with ‘return to sender’ painted on the side” (18). These examples indicate that the first problem Vancouver has with this migrant is her foreignness, which is depicted in several ways.
This article discusses how we are able to analyze recent policy changes from the development of Canada’s immigration policy. The main goal was to understand the objectives of the current policy, how it relates to the economy, and who the policy affects. According to the article, the country’s immigration policy has a history of wanting to use immigration for long and short term goals like economic growth and adjusting to current labor market conditions. Canada’s immigration has drastically changed from what it used to be after abandoning and adopting different concepts. An example would be the “absorptive capacity” concept that was abandoned after realizing it doesn’t truly help the long-term goals it originally was thought to be.
With globalization, linguistic diversity has been steadily increasing in Canada, and even though it is known that the government provides services to all Canadian residents, there is a possibility that not every community or individual possesses equitable access to the resources necessary to improve their quality of life. Regardless of the reasons for immigrating to Canada, newcomers encounter a
Canada has a little piece of almost every culture in the world, shown through the large amount of people moving to Canada from every continent in the world. The multitude of cultures is displayed through the plethora of festivals held throughout the country every year, such as the Folk Fest, Edmonton Food Festival, Heritage Festival and the International Film Festival, all bringing in various cultures and traditions from around the world. Canada has all of these festivals due to the large amount of immigration that was even shown in Anita Rau Badami’s essay my Canada, when she and her husband had moved from India to Vancouver. Canada is one if not the most desirable countries to immigrate to, not only for the living conditions but because of the ability to keep your culture and not have to assimilate to a “Canadian” culture. Thanks to immigration Canada has become a great model country to look at for cultural diversity and cultural acceptance that any country can look at and try to model in their own
The Indian Act was constructed to reflect the Canadian government’s primary goal of assimilation. The government anticipated that the process of organized assimilation through legislation would reduce the number of status Indians in Canada, remove the government from the responsibility of First Nations affairs, and make available the land that was currently reserved for First Nations. Without the responsibility of the ‘Indian problem’, the Canadian government would no longer be required to spend limited federal funds on its burdensome inhabitants. However, the ‘Indian problem’ did not go away and instead produced gender-based discrimination towards the women of Canada’s First Nations communities, resulting in a loss of status, status rights, and identity for generations to come.
Intentions of Legislation The Canadian Multiculturalism Act (1988) aims to preserve and enhance multiculturalism in Canada. The legislation attempts to unite members of different cultures while allowing them to preserve their unique cultural and ethnic identities but also create an integrated Canadian identity. With this act, the Government of Canada is committed to working to achieve the equality of all Canadians in the economic, social, cultural and political dimensions (Government of Canada, Department of Citizenship and Immigration, 2015a). As mentioned earlier, an individual’s health is shaped by his or her social, economic, and physical environments, which this legislation attempts to influence through many of its intentions.
The improvement of the rights of the Canadian Immigrants Canada, as one of the biggest immigration countries, welcomes people from all over the the world and forms a representative multicultural atmosphere in today’s society. Over these few decays, the country has always been consummating the laws to provide immigrants equal rights and freedoms, and better treatments they could receive. However, Canadian immigration laws were not unprejudiced and it eventually caused a “legal discrimination” before 1976. The legal rights of the immigrant groups have improved significantly because of the demands of developing the country, the influences of the wars, and the globalization of the world. Since 1880s, more immigrants and foreigners came to Canada because of the railway construction project.
Canada often prides itself on its cultural diversity and multiculturalism, accepting individuals and cultures from around the world. The acceptance of these individuals arose from the Canadian Multiculturalism policy of 1971, which was critical in shifting Canada’s approach to diversity and immigration. The Canadian federal government can be viewed as the “instigator of multiculturalism” (Banting, Kymlicka, 2016) because of their understanding of the social importance of immigration. In order to understand the acceptance of cultural diversity and integration of immigrants into Canadian society, it is crucial to ask the question of what impacts the 1971 policy of multiculturalism had on Canadian immigrants?
I. Introduction The history of Chinese Canadians in Canada is complex and has been shaped by various economic, political, social, and cultural factors, as well as by government policies and societal attitudes. The 1970s and 1980s saw a significant increase in Chinese immigration to Canada from Hong Kong, Taiwan, and Mainland China. During this period, Chinese immigrants faced challenges and opportunities as they formed new communities and navigated their place in Canadian society. This report aims to explore the history of Chinese Canadians during the 1970s and 1980s, with a focus on their experiences, challenges, and contributions during this period. It will examine how and why Chinese immigrants came to Canada, where and how they formed
Immigration has been and will continue to happen all around the world. There are so many reasons for people who come from different countries and ethnicities to move from country to country. The reasons why these people immigrate is either they are simply forced to, due to violence and hostility or that they are in search of a better life for them, and or their family etc. Canada being rated number one in quality of life has been a goal for people wanting to immigrate. The Immigration and Refugee Protection Act ( IRPA) was established by the Canadian government in the year 2002.
Multiculturalism is an essential part of Canadian identity. A successful and prosperous multicultural society requires cultural accommodation. According to Citizenship and Immigration Canada 's immigration tracking polls, when Canadians were asked “what is the most important barrier to integration, about two-thirds of Canadians mention language and/or cultural barriers” (Jedwab 2008, 222). The study also revealed that “compared to the rest of the world, Canada ranks amongst the countries most inclined to value the cultural contribution of newcomers” (2008, 221).